Integrated assessment modeling of global climate change: Transparent rational tool for policy making or opaque screen hiding value-laden assumptions?

Environmental Modeling and Assessment

Volumn 2, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 229-249

  Schneider, Stephen H ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY;

GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGES; GLOBAL CLIMATIC CHANGES; INDUCED TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE; INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT; INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT MODELS; SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINE; SUBJECTIVE PROBABILITY; VALUELADEN ASSUMPTIONS;

CLIMATE CHANGE;

CLIMATE CHANGE; DECISION MAKING; GLOBAL CLIMATE; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEM; INTEGRATED APPROACH; INTERDISCIPLINARY APPROACH; POLICY MAKING; SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 21944436365     PISSN: 14202026     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1019090117643     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. J. Alcamo, Image 2.0: Integrated modeling of global climate change, Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 76(1/2) (1994).
2. J. Alcamo, R. Shaw and L. Hordijk, The RAINS Model of Acidification: Science and Strategies in Europe (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1990).
3. J. Alcamo and E. Kreilemen, Emission scenarios and global climate protection. Global environmental change, Human and Policy Divisions 6 (1996) 305-334.
4. 2 emissions, Working paper, INSEAD, France (1996).
5. P.G. Brown, Stewardship of climate. An editorial comment, Climatic Change 37(2) (1997) 329-334.
6. 2 and climate, Climatic Change 3(4) (1981) 429-448.
7. G. Chichilnisky, An axiomatic approach to sustainable development, Social Choice and Welfare 13(2) (1996) 219-248.
8. T. Colborn, D. Dumanoski and J.P. Myers, Our Stolen Future: Are We Threatening Our Fertility, Intelligence, and Survival?: A Scientific Detective Story (Dutton, New York, 1996).
9. Final Report of the Committee on Nuclear and Alternative Energy Systems (CONAES), Energy in Transition: 1985-2010 (National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC, 1979).
10. P. Crosson and N. Rosenberg, An overview of the Mink study, Climatic Change 24(1/2) (1993) 159-173.
11. G.C. Daily, Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems (Island Press, Washington, DC, Covelo, CA, 1997).
12. M. Douglas and A. Wildavsky, Risk and Culture: An Essay on the Selection of Technical and Environmental Danger (University of California Press, Berkeley, 1982).
13. H. Dowlatabadi and M. Kandlikar, Key uncertainties in climate change policy: Results from ICAM-2, in: The 6th Global Warming Conference, San Francisco, CA (1995).