Commentary: Instrumentation rigor and practice

Environment and Planning A

Volumn 39, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 1017-1019

  Poon, Jessie P H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34249788730     PISSN: 0308518X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1068/a39314     Document Type: Note

References (7)

1. Baxter J, Eyles J, 1997, "Evaluating qualitative research in social geography: establishing 'rigour' in interview analysis" Transaction of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series 22 505-525
2. Chen W, Hirschheim R, 2001, "A paradigmatic and methodological examination of information systems research from 1991 to 2001" Information Systems Journal 14 197-235
3. Hammett C, 2003, "Contemporary human geography" fiddling while Rome burns" Geoforum 34 1-3
4. Markusen A, 1999, "Fuzzy concepts, scanty evidence: policy distance: the case for rigor and policy relevance in critical regional studies" Regional Studies 33 869-884
5. Silverman D, 1993 Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analyzing Talk, Text and Interactions (Sage, London)
6. Straub D W, Carison C L, 1989, "Validating instruments in MIS research" MIS Quarterly 13 147-169
7. Valentine G, 2006, "Relevance and rigour: the advantages of reusing and scaling up qualitative data" Environment and Planning A 38 413-415