Relevance and rigour: The advantages of reusing and scaling up qualitative data

Environment and Planning A

Volumn 38, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 413-415

  Valentine, Gill ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33645828000     PISSN: 0308518X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1068/a38276     Document Type: Note

References (9)

1. Baxter J, Eyles J, 1997, "Evaluating qualitative research in social geography: establishing 'rigour' in interview analysis" Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series 22 505-525
2. Castree N, 2002, "Border geography" Area 34 103-112
3. Dorling D, Shaw M, 2002, "Geographies of the agenda: public policy, the discipline and its (re)'turns'" Progress in Human Geography 26 629-646
4. James A, Gray M, Martin R, Plummer P, 2004, "Commentary" Environment and Planning A 36 1901-1905
5. Martin R, 2001, "Geography and public policy: the case of the missing agenda" Progress in Human Geography 25 189-210
6. Noblit G, Hare R, 1988 Metaethnography: Synthesising Qualitative Studies (Sage, Newbury Park, CA)
7. Peck J, 1999, "Grey geography" Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series 24 131-134
8. Spencer L, Ritchie J, Lewis J, Dillon L, 2003 Quality in Qualitative Evaluation: A Framework for Assessing Research Evidence Government Chief Social Researcher's Office (Cabinet Office, London)
9. Valentine G, 2005, "Joining up evidence on social exclusion: re-using and scaling up qualitative data", paper out to review, available from the author