Determination of radical re-encounter probability distributions from magnetic field effects on reaction yields

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Volumn 129, Issue 21, 2007, Pages 6746-6755

  Rodgers, Christopher T ^a   Norman, Stuart A ^a   Henbest, Kevin B ^a   Timmel, Christiane R ^a   Hore, P J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; MAGNETIC FIELD EFFECTS; PHOTOCHEMICAL REACTIONS; PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS;

HYPERFINE COUPLINGS; REACTION PARTNERS; WELLER EQUATIONS;

PYRENE;

N,N DIMETHYLANILINE; PYRENE; RADICAL;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL REACTION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ENTROPY; MAGNETIC FIELD; PHOTOCHEMISTRY; PROBABILITY; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS;

EID: 34249781983     PISSN: 00027863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ja068209l     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Steiner, U. E.; Ulrich, T. Chem. Rev. 1989, 89, 51-147.
2. Woodward, J. R. Prog. React. Kinet. Mech. 2002, 27, 165-207.
3. Brocklehurst, B. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2002, 31, 301-311.
4. Brocklehurst, B.; McLauchlan, K. A. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 1996, 69, 3-24.
5. Swanson, J.; Kheifets, L. Radiat. Res. 2006, 165, 470-478.
6. NRPB report of the Advisory Group on Non-ionising Radiation, Chairman Sir Richard Doll, ELF Electromagnetic Fields and the Risk of Cancer, 2001, Chapter 8, paragraph 2.
7. Schulten, K.; Swenberg, C. E.; Weller, A. Z. Phys. Chem. NF 1978, 111, 1-5.
8. Ritz, T.; Adem, S.; Schulten, K. Biophys. J. 2000, 78, 707-718.
9. Brocklehurst, B. J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 11 1976, 72, 1869-1884.
10. Timmel, C. R.; Till, U.; Brocklehurst, B.; McLauchlan, K. A.; Hore, P. J. Mol. Phys. 1998, 95, 71-89.
11. Eveson, R. W.; Timmel, C. R.; Brocklehurst, B.; Hore, P. J.; McLauchlan, K. A. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 2000, 76, 1509-1522.
12. Batchelor, S. N.; Kay, C. W. M.; McLauchlan, K. A.; Shkrob, I. A. J. Phys. Chem. 1993, 97, 13250-13258.
13. Stass, D. V.; Lukzen, N. N.; Tadjikov, B. M.; Molin, Y. N. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1995, 233, 444-450.
14. Stass, D. V.; Tadjikov, B. M.; Molin, Y. N. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1995, 235, 511-516.
15. Sacher, M.; Grampp, G. Ber. Bunsen. Phys. Chem. 1997, 101, 971-974.
16. Saik, V. O.; Ostafin, A. E.; Lipsky, S. J. Chem. Phys. 1995, 103, 7347-7358.
17. Till, U.; Timmel, C. R.; Brocklehurst, B.; Hore, P. J. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1998, 298, 7-14.
18. Kaptein, R.; Oosterhoff, L. J. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1969, 4, 195-197.
19. Kaptein, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1972, 94, 6251-6262.
20. Adrian, F. J. J. Chem. Phys. 1971, 54, 3912-3917.
21. Closs, G. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1969, 91, 4552-4554.
22. Closs, G. L.; Trifunac, A. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1970, 92, 2183-2184.
23. Pedersen, J. B.; Freed, J. H. J. Chem. Phys. 1973, 58, 2746-2762.
24. Noyes, R. M. J. Chem. Phys. 1954, 22, 1349-1359.
25. Justinek, M.; Grampp, G.; Landgraf, S.; Hore, P. J.; Lukzen, N. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 5635-5646.
26. Weller, A.; Nolting, F.; Staerk, H. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1983, 96, 24-27.
27. Henbest, K. B.; Athanassiades, E.; Maeda, K.; Kuprov, I.; Hore, P. J.; Timmel, C. R. Mol. Phys. 2006, 104, 1789-1794.
28. Weller, A.; Staerk, H.; Treichel, R. Faraday Discuss. 1984, 271-278.
29. Woodward, J. R.; Timmel, C. R.; McLauchlan, K. A.; Hore, P. J. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2001, 87, 077602.
30. Schulten, K.; Bittl, R. J. Chem. Phys. 1986, 84, 5155-5161.
31. The literature contains conflicting definitions of the effective (or average) hyperfine coupling constant. We have chosen to use a definition incorporating a factor of 4/3 in order that the hyperfine energies of a one-proton radical pair are conserved when it is considered in terms of effective hyperfine coupling constants.
32. The version of eq 2 given by Weller et al. has a leading factor of 2 instead of √3 because their version of eq 1 does not contain the 4/3 factor.
33. Claridge, R. F.; Kirk, C. M.; Peake, B. M. Aust. J. Chem. 1973, 26, 2055-2058.
34. Pobedimskii, B. G.; Buchachenko, A. L.; Neiman, M. B. Russ. J. Phys. Chem. 1968, 42, 748-751.
35. Fornberg, B. Math. Comput. 1988, 51, 699-706.
36. Matlab, R2006a; The Mathworks, Inc.
37. Hansen, P. C. Rank-deficient and discrete ill-posed problems: numerical aspects of linear inversion. SIAM: 1998.
38. Tihonov, A. N. Soviet Math. Dokl. 1963, 4, 1035-1038.
39. Tikhonov, A. N.; Arsenin, V. Y. Solutions of ill-posed problems. V. H. Winston & Sons: Washington, D.C., 1977.
40. Hansen, P. C. SIAM Review 1992, 34, 561-580.
41. Hansen, P. C.; O'Leary, D. P. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 1993, 14, 1487-1503.
42. Hansen, P. C. Regularization tools: a Matlab package for analysis and solution of discrete ill-posed problems.
43. Bro, R.; de Jong, S. J. Chemomet. 1997, 11, 393-401.
44. Lawson, C. L.; Hanson, R. J. Solving least squares problems; Prentice Hall Inc.: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1974.
45. Gull, S. F.; Daniell, G. J. Nature 1978, 272, 686-690.
46. Jaynes, E. T. Phys. Rev. 1957, 106, 620-630.
47. Jaynes, E. T. Phys. Rev. 1957, 108, 171-190.
48. Jaynes, E. T. In Maximum Entropy Formalism Conference; Levine, R. D., Tribus, M., Eds.; MIT Press: 1978; pp 15-118.
49. Buck, B.; Macaulay, V. A. Maximum Entropy in Action; Oxford University Press: Oxford, 1991.
50. Skilling, J.; Bryan, R. K. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 1984, 211, 111-124.