Questionnaire study of neuromonitoring availability and usage for spine surgery

Journal of Spinal Disorders and Techniques

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 282-289

  Magit, David P ^a   Hilibrand, Alan S ^b   Kirk, Jessica ^a   Rechtine, Glenn ^c   Albert, Todd J ^b   Vaccaro, Alexander R ^b   Simpson, Andrew K ^a   Grauer, Jonathan N ^a  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Electromyography; Evoked potentials; Intraoperative neuromonitoring; Motor; Public opinion; Questionnaires; Somatosensory evoked motor potentials

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CERVICAL SPINE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEMOGRAPHY; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; EVOKED MUSCLE RESPONSE; EVOKED SOMATOSENSORY RESPONSE; HUMAN; NORMAL HUMAN; PATIENT MONITORING; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; SATISFACTION; SPINAL CORD DISEASE; SPINE DISEASE; SPINE SURGERY; SURGEON; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; ELECTRODIAGNOSIS; HUMANS; MONITORING, INTRAOPERATIVE; NEUROSURGERY; ORTHOPEDICS; PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; QUESTIONNAIRES; SPINE;

EID: 34249781965     PISSN: 15360652     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.bsd.0000211286.98895.ea     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Hoppenfeld S, Gross A, Andrews C, et al. The ankle clonus test for assessment of the integrity of the spinal cord during operations for scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg. 1997;79A:208.
2. Vauzelle C, Stagnara P, Jouvinro P. Functional monitoring of spinal cord activity during spinal surgery. Clin Orthop. 1973;173-178.
3. Luk KDK, Hu Y, Wong YW, et al. Evaluation of various evoked potential techniques for spinal cord monitoring during scoliosis surgery. Spine. 2001;26:1772-1777.
4. Dawson EG, Sherman JE, Kanim LE, et al. Spinal cord monitoring. Results of the Scoliosis Research Society and the European Spinal Deformity Society survey. Spine. 1991;16(8 suppl):S361-S364.
5. Nash CL, Lorig RA, Schatzinger LA, et al. Spinal cord monitoring during operative treatment of spine. Clin Orthop. 1977;100-105.
6. Nuwer MR, Dawson EG, Carlson LG, et al. Somatosensory evoked potential spinal cord monitoring reduces neurologic deficits after scoliosis surgery: results of a large multicenter survey. Evoked Potentials-Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1995;96:6-11.
7. Schwartz DM, Schwartz JA, Pratt RE, et al. Influence of nitrous oxide on posterior tibial nerve cortical somatosensory evoked potentials. J Spin Disord. 1997;10:80-86.
8. Bradshaw K, Webb JK, Fraser AM. Clinical evaluation of spinal cord monitoring in scoliosis surgery. Spine. 1984;9:636-643.
9. Grundy BL, Nash CL Jr, Brown RH. Arterial pressure manipulation alters spinal cord function during correction of scoliosis. Anesthesiology. 1981;54:249.
10. Grundy BL, Nelson PB, Doyle E, et al. Intraoperative loss of somatosensory-evoked potentials predicts loss of spinal cord function. Anesthesiology. 1982;57:321-322.
11. Jones SJ, Edgar MA, Ransford AO, et al. A system for the electrophysiological monitoring of the spinal cord during operations for scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg. 1983;65B:134.
12. McPherson RW, Szymanski J, Rogers MC. Somatosensory evoked potential changes in position-related brain stem ischemia. Anesthesiology. 1984;61:88.
13. Ben-David B, Haller G, Taylor P. Anterior spinal fusion complicated by paraplegia. A case report of a false-negative somatosensory-evoked potential. Spine. 1987;12:536.
14. Chatrian GE, Berger MS, Wirch AL. Discrepancy between intraoperative SSEP's and postoperative function. Case report. J Neurosurg. 1988;69:450.
15. Dinner DS, Luders H, Lesser RP. Intraoperative spinal somatosensory evoked potential monitoring. J Neurosurg. 1986;65:807.
16. Lubicky JP, Spadaro JA, Yuan HA, et al. Variability of somatosensory cortical evoked potential monitoring during spinal surgery. Spine. 1989;14:790.
17. Owen JH, Jenny AB, Naito M, et al. Effects of spinal cord lesioning on somatosensory and neurogenic-motor evoked potentials. Spine. 1989;14:673.
18. Barker AT, Jalinous R, Freeston IL. Non-invasive magnetic stimulation of human motor cortex. Lancet. 1985;1:1106.
19. Edmonds HL Jr, Paloheimo MPJ, Backman MH, et al. Transcranial magnetic motor evoked potentials (tcMMEP) for functional monitoring of motor pathways during scoliosis surgery. Spine. 1989;14:683.
20. Gugino LD, Aglio LS, Segal ME, et al. Use of transcranial magnetic stimulation for monitoring spinal cord motor paths. Sem Spine Surg. 1997;9:315.
21. Kalkman CJ, Been HD, Ongerboer de Visser BW. Intraoperative monitoring of spinal cord function: a review. Acta Orthop Scand. 1993;64:114.
22. Machida M, Weinstein SL, Yamada T, et al. Spinal cord monitoring. Electrophysiological measures of sensory and motor function during spinal surgery. Spine. 1985;10:407.
23. Owen JH, Bridwell KH, Grubb R, et al. The clinical application of neurogenic motor evoked potentials to monitor spinal cord function during surgery. Spine. 1991;16(8 suppl):S385-S390.
24. Owen JH, Laschinger J, Bridwell K, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of somatosensory and neurogenic-motor evoked potentials in animals and humans. Spine. 1988;13:1111.
25. Padberg AM, Wilson-Holden TJ, Lenke LG, et al. Somatosensoryand motor-evoked potential monitoring without a wake-up test during idiopathic up test during idiopathic scoliosis surgery: an accepted standard of care. Spine. 1998;23:1392.
26. Hilibrand AS, Sethuraman V, Vaccaro AR, et al. Comparison of transcranial electric motor and somatosensory evoked potential monitoring during cervical spine surgery. J Bone Joint Surg. 2004;86A:1248.
27. Machida M, Asai T, Sato K, et al. New approach for diagnosis in herniated lumbosacral disc. Dermatomal somatosensory evoked potentials (DSSEPs). Spine. 1986;11:380.
28. Lenke LG, Padberg AM, Russo MH, et al. Triggered electromyographic threshold for accuracy of pedicle screw placement: an animal model and clinical correlation. Spine. 1995;20:1585.
29. Toleikis JR, Carlvin AO, Shapiro DE, et al. The use of dermatomal evoked responses during surgical procedures that use intrapedicular fixation of the lumbosacral spine. Spine. 1993;18:2401.
30. Tsai RYC, Yang RS, Kanim LEA, et al. Intraoperative dermatomal evoked potential monitoring fails to predict outcome from lumbar decompression surgery. Spine. 1997;22:1970.
31. Calancie B, Lebwohl N, Madsen P, et al. Intraoperative evoked EMG monitoring in an animal model: a new technique for evaluating pedicle screw placement. Spine. 1992;17:1229.
32. Holland NR, Kostuik JP. Continuous electromyographic monitoring to detect nerve root injury during thoracolumbar scoliosis surgery. Spine. 1997;22:2547.
33. Hormes JT, Chappuis JL. Monitoring of lumbosacral nerve roots during spinal instrumentation. Spine. 1993;18:2059.
34. Owen JH, Kostuik JP, Gornet M, et al. The use of mechanically elicited electromyograms to protect nerve roots during surgery for spinal degeneration. Spine. 1994;19:1704.
35. Gundanna M, Eskenazi M, Bendo J, et al. Somatosensory evoked potential monitoring of lumbar pedicle screw placement for in situ posterior spinal fusion. Spine J. 2003;3:370.
36. May DM, Jones SJ, Crockard HA. Somatosensory evoked potential monitoring in cervical surgery: identification of pre- and intraoperative risk factors associated with neurological deterioration. J Neurosurg. 1996;85:566.
37. Welch WC, Rose RD, Balzer JR, et al. Evaluation with evoked and spontaneous electromyography during lumbar instrumentation: a prospective study. J Neurosurg. 1997;87:397.
38. MacDonald DB, Khoudeir I, Stigsby B, et al. Monitoring scoliosis surgery with combined multiple pulse transcranial electric motor and cortical somatosensory-evoked potentials from the lower and upper extremities. Spine. 2003;28:194.
39. Pelosi L, Lamb J, Grevitt M, et al. Combined monitoring of motor and somatosensory evoked potentials in orthopaedic spinal surgery. Clin Neurophys. 2002;113:1082.