Influence of different implant surfaces on peri-implant osteogenesis: Histomorphometric analysis in sheep

Journal of Periodontology

Volumn 78, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 879-888

  Franchi, Marco ^a,c   Bacchelli, Beatrice ^a   Giavaresi, Gianluca ^b   De Pasquale, Viviana ^a   Martini, Désirée ^a   Fini, Milena ^b   Giardino, Roberto ^b   Ruggeri, Alessandro ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

^b RIZZOLI ORTHOPAEDIC INSTITUTE   (Italy)

^c Human Anatomy Institute   (Italy)

Author keywords

Dental implantation; Electron; Endosseous; Histology; Microscopy; Osseointegration; Titanium; Zirconium oxide

Indexed keywords

TITANIUM; ZIRCONIUM;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BONE DEVELOPMENT; BONE REGENERATION; BONE SCREW; INSTRUMENTATION; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PHYSIOLOGY; SHEEP; SURFACE PROPERTY; TIBIA; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; BONE SCREWS; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL IMPLANTS, SINGLE-TOOTH; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; OSSEOINTEGRATION; OSTEOGENESIS; SHEEP; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TIBIA; TITANIUM; ZIRCONIUM;

EID: 34249774606     PISSN: 00223492     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1902/jop.2007.060280     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Breme J, Steinhäuser E, Paulus G. Commercially pure titanium Steinhäuser plate-screw systm for maxillofacial surgery. Biomaterials 1988;9:310-313.
2. Browne M, Gregson PJ. Effect of mechanical surface pretreatment on metal ion release. Bioniaterials 2000; 21:385-392.
3. Rae T. A study on the effects of particulate metals of orthopaedic interest on murine macrophages in vitro. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1975;57:444-450.
4. Rae T. The toxicity of metals used in orthopaedic protheses. An experimental study using cultured human synovial fibroblasts. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1981; 63-B:435-440.
5. Brune D, Evje D, Melson S. Corrosion of gold alloys and titanium in artificial saliva. Scand J Dent Res 1982; 90:168-171.
6. Skalak R. Biomechanical considerations in osseointegrated prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 1983;49:843-848.
7. Albrektsson T, Hansson HA. An ultrastructural characterization of the interface between bone and sputtered titanium or stainless steel surfaces. Biomaterials 1986;7:201-205.
8. Puleo DA, Nanci A. Understanding and controlling the bone-implant interface. Biomaterials 1999;20:2311-2321.
9. Shirakura M, Fujii N, Ohnishi H, et al. Tissue response to titanium implantation in the rat maxilla, with special reference to the effects of surface conditions on bone formation. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003; 14:687-696.
10. Davies JE. Understanding peri-implant endosseous healing. J Dent Educ 2003;67:932-949.
11. Franchi M, Fini M, Martini D, et al. Biological fixation of endosseous implants. Micron 2005;36:665-671.
12. Vercaigne S, Wolke JGC, Naert I, et al. Histomorphometrical and mechanical evaluation of titanium plasma-sprayed-coated implants placed in the cortical bone of goats. J Biomed Mater Res 1998;41:41-48.
13. Hansson S. The implant neck: Smooth or provided with retention elements: A biomechanical approach. Clin Oral Implants Res 1999;10:394-405.
14. Buser D, Schenk RK, Steinemann S, Fiorellini JP, Fox CH, Stich H. Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants. A histometric study in miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res 1991; 25:889-902.
15. Cochran DL, Nummikoshi PV, Higginbottom FL, et al. Evaluation of an endosseous titanium implant with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface in the canine mandible: Radiographic results. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996;7:240-252.
16. Cochran DL, Schenk RK, Lussi A, et al. Bone response to unloaded titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface: A histomorphometric study in the canine mandible. J Biomed Mater Res 1998;40:1-11.
17. Mustafa K, Wroblewski J, Hultenby K, et al. Effects of titanium surfaces blasted with TiO2 particles on the initial attachment of cells derived from human mandibular bone. A scanning electron microscopic and histomorphometric analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000; 11: 116-128.
18. Anselme K, Bigerelle M, Noe IB, et al. Effect of grooved titanium substratum on human osteoblastic cell growth. J Biomed Mater Res 2002;60:529-540.
19. Weng D, Hoffmeyer M, Hurzeler MB, et al. Osseoitite vs. Machined surface in poor bone quality. A study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003; 14:703-708.
20. Borsari V, Giavaresi G, Fini M, et al. Comparative in vitro study on a ultra-high roughness and dense titanium coating. Biomaterials 2005;26:4948-4955.
21. Berglundh T, Abrahamsson I, Lang NP, et al. De novo alveolar bone formation adjacent to endosseous implants. A model in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003; 14:251-262.
22. Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T, Linder E, et al. Early bone formation adjacent to rough and turned endosseous implant surfaces. An experimental study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004; 15:381-392.
23. Brånemark PI, Hansson BO, Adell R, et al. Osseointegrated implants in detriment of the edentulous jaw: Experience from a 10-year period. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1977; 16(Suppi.):1-132.
24. Davies JE, Lowenberg B, Shiga A. The bone-titanium interface in vitro. J Biomed Mater Res 1990;24:1289-1306.
25. Deporter DA, Watson PA, Pilliar RM, et al. A histological comparison in the dog of porous-coated vs. threaded dental implants. J Dent Res 1990;69:1138-1145.
26. Weinlaender M, Kenney EB, Lekovic V, et al. Histomorphometry of bone apposition around three types of endosseous dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992;7:491-496.
27. Hazan R, Brener R, Oron U. Bone growth to metal implants is regulated by their surface chemical properties. Biomaterials 1993;14:570-574.
28. Haas R, Menserdorff-Poiully N, Mailath G, et al. Survival of 1,920 IMZ implants followed for up to 100 months. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996; 11:581-588.
29. Zechner W, Tangl S, Furst G, et al. Osseous healing characteristics of three different implant types. A histologic and histomorphometric study in mini-pigs. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14:150-157.
30. Shirakura M, Fujii N, Ohnishi H, et al. Tissue response to titanium implantation in the rat maxilla, with special reference to the effect of surface conditions on bone formation. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14:687-696.
31. Meyer U, Joos U, Mythili J, et al. Ultrastructural characterization of the implant/bone interface of immediately loaded dental implants. Biomaterials 2004;25: 1959-1967.
32. Lange R, Luthen F, Beck U, et al. Cell-extracellular matrix interaction and physico-chemical characteristics of titanium surfaces depend on the roughness of the material. Biomol Eng 2002; 19:255-261.
33. Melcher AH, Cheong T, Cox J, et al. Synthesis of cementum-like tissue in vitro by cells cultured from bone: A light and electron microscope study. J Periodontal Res 1986;21:592-612.
34. Sautier JM, Nefussi JR, Forest N. Mineralization and bone formation on microcarrier beads with isolated rat calvaria cell population. Calcif Tissue Int 1992;50: 527-532.
35. Davies JE. In vitro modelling of the bone/implant interface. Anat Rec 1996;245:426-445.
36. Simmons CA, Valiquette N, Pilliar RM. Osseointegration of sintered porous-surfaced and plasma spray-coated implants: An animal model study of early postimplantation healing response and mechanical stability. J Biomed Mater Res 1999;47:127-138.
37. Futami T, Fujii N, Ohnishi H, et a). Tissue response to titanium implants in the rat maxilla: Ultrastructural and histochemical observations of the bone-titanium interface. J Periodontol 2000;71:287-298.
38. Chappard D, Grizon E, Brechet I, et al. Evolution of the bone/titanium interface on implants coated/noncoated with xenogeneic bone particles: A quantitative microscopic analysis. J Biomed Mater Res 1996;32: 175-180.
39. Chappard D, Aguado E, Huré G, et al. The early remodeling phases around titanium implants: A histomorphometric assessment of bone quality in a 3- and 6-month study in sheep. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:189-196.
40. Franchi M, Fini M, Giavaresi G, et al. Peri-implant osteogenesis in health and osteoporosis. Micron 2005; 36:630-644.
41. Ferguson SJ, Broggini N, Wieland M, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of the interfacial strength of a chemically modified sandblasted and acid-etched titanium surface. J Biomed Mater Res 2006;78:291-297.
42. Buser D, Nydegger T, OxIand T, et al. Interface shear strength of titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface: A biomechanical study in the maxilla of miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res 1999; 45:75-83.
43. Guizzardi S, Galli C, Martini D, et al. Different titanium surface treatment influences human mandibular osteoblast response. J Periodontol 2004;75:273-282.
44. Hallgren C, Reimers H, Gold J, et al. The importance of surface texture for bone integration of screw shaped implants: An in vivo study of implants patterned by photolithography. J Biomed Mater Res 2001;57:485-496.
45. Parfitt AM. Bone remodeling and bone loss: Understanding the pathophysioiogy of osteoporosis. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1987;30:789-811.
46. Huja SS, Katona TR, Moore BK, et al. Microhardness and anisotropy of the vital osseous interface and endosseous implants supporting bone. J Orthop Res 1998; 16:54-60.
47. Huja SS, Katona TR, Roberts WE. Microhardness testing of bone. In: An YH, Draughin RA, eds. Mechanical Testing of Bone and the Bone-Implant Interface. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2000:247-256.
48. Davies JE. Mechanisms of endosseous integration. Int J Prosthodont 1998; 11: 391-401.
49. Ferretti M, Palombo C, Contri M, et al. Static and dynamic osteogenesis: Two different types of bone formation. Anat Embryol (Berl) 2002;206:21-29.
50. Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Oral implant surfaces: Part 1 - Review focusing on topographic and chemical properties of different surfaces and in vivo responses to them. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:536-543.
51. Abrahamsson I, Zitzmann NU, Berglundh T, et al. Bone and soft tissue integration to titanium implants with different surface topography: An experimental study in the dog. Int J Oral Maxillojac Implants 2001;16: 323-332.
52. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Andersson B, et al. A histomorphometric and removal torque study of screw-shaped titanium implants with three different surface topographies. Clin Oral Implants Res 1995;6:24-30.
53. Probst A, Spiegel HU. Cellular mechanisms of bone repair. J Invest Surg 1997; 10:77-86.