Interventions aimed at increasing research use in nursing: A systematic review

Implementation Science

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 1-16

  Thompson, David S ^a   Estabrooks, Carole A ^a   Scott Findlay, Shannon ^a   Moore, Katherine ^a   Wallin, Lars ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^b KAROLINSKA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34249747920     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17485908     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-2-1     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Aiken LH, Clarke SP, Sloan DM: Hospital staffing, organization, and quality of care: Cross-national findings. Nurs Outlook 2002, 50:187-94.
2. Biegen M, Goode C, Reed L: Nurse staffing and patient outcomes. Nurs Res 1998, 47:43-50.
3. Estabrooks CA, Midodzi W, Cummings G, Ricker K, Giovannetti P: The impact of hospital nursing characteristics on 30-day mortality. Nurs Res 2005, 54:74-84.
4. Estabrooks CA, Chong H, Brigidear K, Profetto-McGrath J: Profiling Canadian nurses' preferred knowledge sources for clinical practice. Can J Nurs Res 2005, 37:118-140.
5. Schuster M, McGlynn E, Brook R: How good is the quality of health care in the United States. Milbank Q 1998, 76:517-563.
6. Bero L, Grilli R, Grimshaw J, Harvey E, Oxman A, Thomson M: Closing the gap between research and practice: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions to promote the implementation of research findings. BMJ 1998, 317:465-68.
7. Grimshaw JM, Shirran L, Thomas R, Mowatt G, Fraser C, Bero L, Grilli R, Harvey E, Oxman A, O'Brien MA: Changing provider behavior: An overview of systematic reviews of interventions. Med Care 2001:2-45.
8. Grimshaw JM, Thomas R, MacLennan G, Fraser C, Ramsay C, Vale L, Whitty P, Eccles MP, Matawe L, Shirran L, Wensing M, Dijkstra R, Donaldson C: Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies. Health Technol Assess 2004, 8:1-72.
9. O'Brien MA, Freemantle N, Oxman AD, Wolf F, Davis DA, Herrin J: Continuing education meetings and workshops: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrone Database Syst Rev 2003.
10. Thomas L, Cullum N, McColl E, Rousseau N, Soutter J, Steen N: Guidelines in professions allied to medicine. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000.
11. Foxcroft D, Cole N: Organisational infrastructures to promote evidence based nursing practice. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003.
12. West E, Barron D, Dowsett J, Newton J: Hierarchies and cliques in the social networks of care professionals: implications for the design of dissemination strategies. Soc Sci Med 1999, 48:633-44.
13. Hakkennes S, Green S: Measures for assessing practice change in medical professionals. Implement Sci 2006, 1:29.
14. Amara N, Ouimet M, Landry R: New evidence on instrumental, conceptual, and symbolic research utilization of University Research in Government Agencies. Sci Commun 2004, 26:75-106.
15. Beyer J: Research utilization: Bridging the gap between communities. J Management Inquiry 1997, 6:17-22.
16. Beyer J, Trice H: The utilization process: A conceptual framework and synthesis of empirical findings. Adm Sci Q 1982, 27:591-622.
17. Estabrooks CA: The conceptual structure of research utilization. Res Nurs Health 1999, 22:203-216.
18. Kenny D: Nurses' use of research in practice at three US Army Hospitals. Can J Nurs Leadersh 2005, 18:45-67.
19. Landry R, Amari N, Lamari M: Utilization of social science research knowledge in Canada. Research Policy 2001, 30:333-349.
20. Profetto-McGrath J, Hesketh K, Lang S, Estabrooks CA: A study of critical thinking and research utilization among nurses. West J Nurs Res 2003, 25:322-337.
21. Majumdar S, Finlay M, Furberg C: From knowledge to practice in chronic cardiovascular disease: A long and winding road. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004, 43:1738-1742.
22. Estabrooks CA, Wallin L, Milner M: Measuring knowledge utilization in health care. International Journal of Policy Evaluation & Management 2003, 1:3-36.
23. Scott-Findlay S, Estabrooks CA: Knowledge translation and pain management. In Bringing Pain Relief to Children Edited by: Finley G, McGrath P. Chambers C. Totowa: Humana Press; 2006:199-228.
24. Dufault M, Bielecki C, Collins E, Willey C: Changing nurses' pain assessment practice: a collaborative research utilization approach. J Adv Nurs 1995, 21:634-645.
25. Hong SW, Ching TY, Fung JP, Seto WL: The employment of ward opinion leaders for continuing education the hospital. Med Teach 1990, 12:209-218.
26. Tranmer JE, Lochaus-Gerlach J, Lam M: The effect of staff nurse participation in a clinical nursing research project on attitude towards, access to, support of and use of research in acute care settings. Can J Nurs Leadersh 2002, 15:18-26.
27. Tsai S: The effects of a research utilization in-service program on nurses. IntJ Nurs Stud 2003, 40:105-1 13.
28. Davies B, Hodnett E, Hannah M, O'Brien-Pallas L, Pringle D, Wells G: Fetal health surveillance: a community wide approach ver-sus a tailored intervention for the implementation of clinical practice guidelines. Can Med Assoc J 2002, 167:469-474.
29. Hodnett ED, Kaufman K, O'Brien-Pallas L, Chipman M, Watson-Mac-Donell J, Hunsburger W: A strategy to promote research-based nursing care: effects on childbirth outcomes. Nurs Res 1996, 19:13-20.
30. McDonald M, Pezzin L, Feldman P, Murtaugh C, Peng T: Can just-in-time, evidence-based "reminders" improve pain management among home health care nurses and their patients. J Pain Symptom Manage 2005, 29:474-488.
31. Murtaugh C, Pezzin L, McDonald M, Feldman P, Peng T: Just-in-time evidence based e-mail "reminders" in home health care: Impact on nurse practices. Health Serv Res 2005, 40:849-864.
32. Feldman PH, Murtaugh CM, Pezzin LE, McDonald MV, Peng TR: Just-in-time evidence-based e-mail "reminders" in home health care: impact on patient outcomes. Health Serv Res 2005, 40:865-85.
33. Feldman PH, Peng T, Murtaugh C, Kelleher C, Donelson S, McCann E: A randomized intervention to improve heart failure outcomes in community-based home health care. Home Health Care Serv Q 2004, 23:1-23.
34. Gould D, Chamberlain A: The use of a ward-based educational teaching package to enhance nurses' compliance with infection control procedures. J Clin Nurs 1997, 6:55-67.
35. Jones K, Fink R, Vojir C, Pepper G, Hutt E, Clark L, Scott J, Martinez R, Vincent D, Mellis K: Translating research in long-term care: Improving pain management in nursing homes. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs 2004:13-20.
36. Moongtui W, Gauthier D, Turner J: Using peer feedback to improve handwashing and glove usage among Thai health care workers. Am J Infect Control 2000, 28:365-369.
37. Krichbaum K, Pearson V, Savik K, Mueller C: Improving resident outcomes with GAPN organization level interventions. West; Nurs Res 2005, 27:322-37.
38. Cochrane Collaboration: Effective Practice and Organization of Care Group [http://www.epoc.uottawa.ca/]
39. Kim HS: A study of three approaches to research utilization. In Unpublished manuscript University of Rhode Island, Kingston, Rhode Island; 1988.
40. Champion V, Leach A: The relationship of support, availability and attitude to research utilization, J Nurs Adm 1988, 16:19-37.
41. Champion V, Leach A: Variables related to research utilization in nursing: An empirical investigation. J Adv Nurs 1989, 14:705-10.
42. Horsley JA, Crane J, Bingle JD: Research utilization as an organizational process. J Nurs Adm 1978, 8:4-10.
43. Sackett DL, Richardson S, Rosenberg W, Haynes RB: Evidence based medicine: How to practice and how to teach EBM Edinburgh: Churchill Livingtsone; 2000.
44. Rycroft-Malone J, Kitson A, Harvey G, McCormack B, Seers K, Titchen A, Estabrooks CA: Ingredients for change: Revisiting a conceptual framework. Qual Saf Health Care 2002, 11:174-180.
45. Dopson S, Fitzgerald L: The active role of context. In Knowledge to Action? Edited by: Dopson S, Fitzgerald L. Oxford: University Press; 2005:79-102.
46. Donaldson E, Rutledge D, Ashley J: Outcomes of adoption: Measuring evidence uptake by individuals and organizations. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs 2004:S41-S51.
47. Kirchoff KT: State of the science of translational research: From demonstration projects to intervention testing. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs 2004:S6-S12.
48. Titler M: Methods in translation science. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs 2004, 1:38-48.
49. Thompson C: Fortuitous phenomena: On complexity, pragmatic randomized controlled trials, and knowledge for evidence-based practice. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs 2004, 1:9-17.
50. Rich R: Knowledge and policy. The International Journal of Knowledge Transfer and Utilization 1997, 10:11-4.
51. Rich R: Knowledge creation, diffusion, and utilization. Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, and Utilization 1991, 12:319-337.
52. Rich RF: Use of social science information by federal bureaucrats: Knowledge for action vs knowledge for understanding. In Using social science in public policy making Edited by: Weiss C. Lexington: Lexington Books; 1977:199-233.
53. Weiss C: the many meanings of research utilization. Public Adm Rev 1979, 39:426-431.
54. Freemantle N: Interpreting the results of secondary end points and subgroup analyses in clinical trials: should we lock the crazy aunt in the attic? BMJ 2001, 322:989-991,
55. Estabrooks CA, Floyd JA, Scott-Findlay S, O'Leary K, Gushta M: Individual determinants of research utilization: a systematic review, J Adv Nurs 2003, 43:506-520.
56. Begg C, Cho M, Eastwood C, Norton R, Hoher D, Olkin I, Pitkin R, Rennie D, Schulz KF, Simel D, Stroup DF: Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement. J Am Med Assoc 1998, 276:637-639.
57. Elbourne D, Campbell M: Extending the CONSORT statement to cluster randomized trials: for discussion. Stat Med 2001, 20:489-496.
58. Whiting-O'Keefe Q, Henke C, Simborg D: Choosing the correct unit of analysis in medical care experiments. Med Care 1984, 22:101-1 14.
59. Gilbody S, Whitty P: Improving the delivery and organization of mental health services: beyond the conventional randomized controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry 2002, 80:12-8.
60. Egger M, Juni P, Bartlett C, Holesntein F, Sterne J: How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study. Health Technol Assess 2003, 7:1-76.
61. Pham B, Klassen T, Lawson M, Moher D: Language of publication restrictions in systematic reviews gave different results depending on whether the intervention was conventional or complementary, j Clin Epidemiol 2005, 58:e1-769.e10.