Comparison of stream benthic invertebrate assemblages among forest types in the temperate region of Japan

Biodiversity and Conservation

Volumn 16, Issue 7, 2007, Pages 2137-2148

  Yoshimura, Mayumi ^a  

^a FORESTRY AND FOREST PRODUCTS RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Benthic invertebrate assemblage; Forest type; Impact; Old growth forest; Planted coniferous forest

Indexed keywords

ABUNDANCE; BENTHOS; BROAD-LEAVED FOREST; CONIFEROUS FOREST; HEADWATER; MAYFLY; MIXED FOREST; OLD-GROWTH FOREST; SPECIES-AREA RELATIONSHIP; STONEFLY; STREAM;

ASIA; EURASIA; FAR EAST; JAPAN;

ATHERICIDAE; CHIRONOMIDAE; HEPTAGENIIDAE; INVERTEBRATA; POTAMIDAE; STENOPSYCHIDAE; TAENIOPTERYGIDAE; UENOIDAE;

EID: 34249740635     PISSN: 09603115     EISSN: 15729710     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10531-006-9136-4     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Cole MB, Russell KR, Mabee TJ (2003) Relation of headwater macroinvertebrate communities to in-stream and adjacent stand characteristics in managed second-growth forests of the Oregon Coast Range mountains. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 33:1433-1443
2. Cummins KW, Wilzbach MA, Gates DM, Perry JB, Taliaferro WB (1989) Shredders and riparian vegetation. BioScience 39:24-30
3. Eggert SL, Burton TM (1994) A comparison of Acroneuria lycorias (Plecoptera) production and growth in northern Michigan hard-soft-water streams. Freshwater Biology 32:21-31
4. Friberg N (1997) Benthic invertebrate communities in six Danish forest streams: Impact of forest type on structure and function. Ecography 20:19-28
5. Friberg N, Winterbourn MJ, Shearer KA, Larsen SE (1997) Benthic communities of forest streams in the South Island, New Zealand: Effects of forest type and location. Arch Hydrobiol 138:289-306
6. Fuchs SA, Hinch SG, Mellina E (2003) Effects of streamside logging on stream macroinvertebrate communities and habitat in the sub-boreal forests of British Columbia, Canada. Can J For Res 33:1408-1415
7. Hernandez O, Merritt RW, Wipfli MS (2005) Benthic invertebrate community structure is influenced by forest succession after clearcut logging in southeastern Alaska. Hydrobiologia 533:45-59
8. Hewlett R (2000) Implications of taxonomic resolution and sample habitat for stream classification at a broad geographic scale. J North Am Ben Soc 19:352-361
9. Johnson LB, Richards C, Host GE, Arthur JW (1997) Landscape influences on water chemistry in Midwestern stream ecosystems. Freshw Biol 37:193-208
10. Krueger CC, Waters TF (1983) Annual production of macroinvertebrates in three streams of different water quality. Ecology 64:840-850
11. Macdonald JS, Beaudry PG, MacIsaac EA, Herunter HE (2003) The effects of forest harvesting and best management practices on streamflow and suspended sediment concentrations during snowmelt in headwater streams in sub-boreal forests of British Columbia, Canada. Can J For Res 33:1397-1407
12. Piccolo JJ, Wipfli MS (2002) Does red alder (Alnus rubra) in upland riparian forests elevate macroinvertebrates and detritus export from headwater streams to downstream habitats in southeastern Alaska? Can J Fish Aquat Sci 59:503-513
13. Price K, Suski A, McGarvie J, Beasley B, Richardson JS (2003) Communities of aquatic insects of old-growth and clearcut coastal headwater streams of varying flow persistence. Can J For Res 33:1416-1432
14. Snyder CD, Young JA, Lemarié DP, Smith DR (2002) Influence of eastern hemlock (Tsuga canadensis) forests on aquatic invertebrate assemblages in headwater streams. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 59:262-275
15. Volk CJ, Kiffney PM, Edmonds RL (2003) Role of riparian red alder (Alnus rubra) in the nutrient dynamics of coastal streams of the Olympic Peninsula, WA. U.S.A. In: Stockner JG (ed) Nutrient in salmon ecosystems: sustaining production and biodiversity, American Fisheries Society, Bethesda Md, pp 213-225
16. Yoshimura M, Maeto K (2006) Comparison of aquatic invertebrate assemblage between old-growth natural forest and planted coniferous forest basins in Japanese temperate region - in the case of Kuroson stream in the Shimanto River basin. L Ecol Eng 2:81-89