Targeted prostate biopsy using statistical image analysis

IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging

Volumn 26, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 779-788

  Zhan, Yiqiang ^b,c   Shen, Dinggang ^a,b,d   Zeng, Jianchao ^e   Sun, Leon ^f   Fichtinger, Gabor ^a,c   Moul, Judd ^f   Davatzikos, Christos ^a,c,d  

^a IEEE

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^c Johns Hopkins University   (United States)

^d JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e School of Engineering   (United States)

^f DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Biopsy optimization; Prostate cancer; Spatial normalization; Statistical image analysis

Indexed keywords

CONFORMAL MAPPING; IMAGE REGISTRATION; OPTIMIZATION; PROBABILITY; STATISTICAL METHODS; TUMORS;

BIOPSY OPTIMIZATION; PROSTATE CANCER; SPATIAL NORMALIZATION; STATISTICAL IMAGE ANALYSIS;

MEDICAL IMAGING;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; AUTOMATED PATTERN RECOGNITION; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; EVALUATION; HUMAN; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MALE; METHODOLOGY; NEEDLE BIOPSY; PATHOLOGY; PROSTATE; PROSTATE TUMOR; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

ALGORITHMS; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; PROSTATE; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 34249737596     PISSN: 02780062     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2006.891497     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. [Online]. Available: http://www.cancer.orgOverview: Prostate Cancer 2006
2. K. Hodge et al., "Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate," J. Urol., vol. 142, no. 1, pp. 71-74, 1989, discussion 74-5.
3. A. Manseck et al., "Is systematic sextant biopsy suitable for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer?," Urologia Internationalis, vol. 65, pp. 80-83, 2000.
4. K. Fink et al., "Prostate cancer detection with two sets of ten-core sextant biopsies," Urology, vol. 58, pp. 735-739, 2001.
5. F. Rabbani et al., "Incidence and clinical significance of false-negative sextant prostate biopsies," J. Urol., vol. 159, no. 4, pp. 1247-1250, 1997.
6. J. I. Epstein et al., "Use of repeat sextant and transition zone biopsies for assessing extent of prostate cancer," J. Urol., vol. 158, no. 5, pp. 1886-1890, 1997.
7. C. G. Roehrborn, G. J. Pickens, and J. S. Sanders, "Diagnostic yield of repeated transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsies stratified by specific histopathologic diagnoses and prostate-specific antigen levels," Urology, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 347-352, 1996.
8. K. A. Iczkowski et al., "Needle core length in sextant biopsy influences prostate cancer detection rate," Urology, vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 698-703, 2002.
9. L. Egevad and M. Norberg, "The value of multiple core biopsies for predicting the Gleason score of prostate cancer," BJU Int., vol. 88, pp. 716-721, 2001.
10. G. Durkan et al., "Improving prostate cancer detection with an extended-core transrectal ultrasonography-guided biopsy protocol," BJU Int., vol. 89, no. 1, pp. 33-39, 2002.
11. K. Roehl, J. Antenor, and W. Catalona, "Serial biopsy results in prostate cancer screening study," J. Urol., vol. 167, no. 6, pp. 2435-2439, 2002.
12. C. Stewart et al., "Prostate cancer diagnosis using a saturation needle biopsy technique after previous negative sextant biopsies," Urology, vol. 166, no. 1, pp. 86-91, 2001.
13. C. Chon, J. McNeal, and J. Presti, Jr., "Use of extended systematic sampling in patients with a prior negative prostate needle biopsy," Urology, vol. 167, no. 6, pp. 2457-2460, 2002.
14. J. Presti et al., "Extended peripheral zone biopsy schemes increase cancer detection rates and minimizes variance in prostate specific antigen and age related cancer rates: results of a community multi-practice study," J. Urol., vol. 169, no. 1, pp. 125-129, 2003.
15. L. Eskew, R. Bare, and D. McCullough, "Systematic 5 region prostate biopsy is superior to sextant method for diagnosing carcinoma of the prostate," J. Urol., vol. 157, no. 1, pp. 199-202, 1997.
16. M. E. Chen et al., "Comparison of prostate biopsy schemes by computer simulation," Urology, vol. 53, no. 5, pp. 951-960, 1999.
17. M. Chen et al., "Optimization of prostate biopsy strategy using computer based analysis," J Urol., vol. 158, no. 6, pp. 2180-2181, 1997.
18. J. Zeng, J. J. Bauer, and S. K. Mun, "Modeling and mapping of prostate cancer," Comput. Graphics, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 683-694, 2000.
19. Y. Zhu, S. Williams, and R. Zwiggelaar, "Computer technology in detection and staging of prostate carcinoma: a review," Med. Image Anal., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 178-199, 2006.
20. D. Shen et al., "Optimization of biopsy strategy by a statistical atlas of prostate cancer distribution," Med. Image Anal., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 139-150, 2004.
21. G. E. Christensen, S. C. Joshi, and M. I. Miller, "Volumetric transformation of brain anatomy," IEEE Trans. Med. Imag., vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 864-877, Dec. 1997.
22. D. Shen and C. Davatzikos, "HAMMER: Hierarchical attribute matching mechanism for elastic registration," IEEE Trans. Med. Imag., vol. 21, no. 11, pp. 1421-1439, Nov. 2002.
23. L. Taylor et al., "Three-dimensional registration of prostate images from histology and ultrasound," Ultrasound Med. Biol., vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 161-168, 2004.
24. J. Zeng et al., "Distribution of prostate cancer for optimized biopsy protocols," presented at the MICCAI 2000, Pittsburgh, PA, 2000.
25. D. G. Shen, E. Herskovits, and C. Davatzikos, "An adaptive focus statistical shape model for segmentation and shape modeling of 3D brain structures," IEEE Trans. Med. Imag., vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 257-271, Apr. 2001.
26. C. Davatzikos, "Spatial transformation and registration of brain images using elastically deformable models," Comput. Vis. Image Understanding, vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 207-222, 1997.
27. M. D. Rifkin, Ultrasound of the Prostate, Imaging in the Diagnosis and Therapy ofProstatic Disease. Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 1997.
28. C. Schneider, A. M. Okamura, and G. Fichtinger, "A robotic system for transrectal needle insertion into the prostate with integrated ultrasound," presented at the IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics and Automation, New Orleans, LA, 2004.
29. Y. Zhan and D. Shen, "Deformable segmentation of 3D ultrasound prostate images using statistical texture matching method," IEEE Trans. Med. Imag., vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 256-273, Mar. 2006.
30. D. Terzopoulos and K. Fleischer, "Deformable models," Visual Comput, vol. 4, pp. 306-331, 1988.
31. J. Bauer et al., "In 3-D computer simulated prostate models lateral prostate biopsies increase the detection rate of prostate cancer," Urology, vol. 53, no. 5, pp. 961-967, 1999.
32. [Online], Available: http://www.upmccancercenters.comProstate Needle Biopsy 2006
33. J. F. Bolz, E. Grinspun, and P. Schroder, "Sparse matrix solvers on the GPU: conjugate gradients and multigrid," ACM Trans. Graphics, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 917-924, 2003.
34. G. Fichtinger et al., "Robotically assisted prostate brachytherapy with transrectal ultrasound guidance-Phantom experiments," Brachytherapy, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 14-26, 2006.
35. A. Krieger et al., "Design of a novel MRI compatible manipulator for image guided prostate intervention," IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 306-313, Feb. 2005.