GOCE quick-look gravity field analysis in the framework of HPF

European Space Agency, (Special Publication) ESA SP

Volumn , Issue SP-627, 2007, Pages 325-332

  Pail, Roland ^a   Metzler, Bernhard ^a   Preimesberger, Thomas ^a   Lackner, Barbara ^a   Wermuth, Martin ^b  

^a GRAZ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Austria)

^b TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GRADIOMETERS; GRAVITY GRADIENT; MISSION CONTROL; SCIENTIFIC PROCESSING;

COMPUTER HARDWARE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; DATA PROCESSING; FEEDBACK CONTROL; GRAVITATION; ORBITS;

EARTH (PLANET);

EID: 34249729465     PISSN: 03796566     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Badura, T., et al. Derivation of the CHAMP-only global gravity field model TUG-CHAMP04 applying the energy integral approach. Stud. geophys. geod., 50, 59-74, 2006.
2. Földvary, L., et al. Gravity Model TUM-2Sp Based on the Energy Balance Approach and Kinematic CHAMP Orbits. In: Reigber et al. (eds.), Earth Observation with CHAMP - Results from Three Years in Orbit, 13-18, Springer Verlag, 2004.
3. Kern, M., et al. Outlier detection algorithms and their performance in GOCE gravity field processing. J. Geod, 78, 509-519, 2005.
4. Koch, K.-R., and Kusche, J. Regularization of geopotential determination from satellite data by variance components. J. Geod., 76, 259-268, 2002
5. Lackner, B. Datainspection and Hypothesis Tests of very long Time Series applied to GOCE Satellite Gravity Gradiometry Data. Dissertation, 187pp, Graz University of Technology, Graz, 2006.
6. Lemoine, F.G, et al. The Development of the Joint NASA GSFC and the National Imagery and Mapping Agency (NIMA) Geopotential Model EGM96. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, 1998.
7. Metzler, B., and Pail R. GOCE data processing: the Spherical Cap Regularization Approach. Stud. Geophys. Geod., 49, 441-462, 2005.
8. Pail, R. A parametric study on the impact of satellite attitude errors on GOCE gravity field recovery. J. Geod., 79, 231-241, 2005.
9. Pail, R., et al. Quick-Look Gravity Field Analysis (QL-GFA). DAPC Graz, Phase Ia, Final Report, WP Ia-4.1, 107-161, Graz, 2003.
10. rd GOCE User Workshop, Frascati, November 2006, European Space Agency, Noordwijk, 2006.
11. Pail, R., and Plank, G. Assessment of three numerical solution strategies for gravity field recovery from GOCE satellite gravity gradiometry implemented on a parallel platform. J. Geod., 76, 462-474, 2002.
12. Pail, R., and Plank, G. GOCE Gravity Field Processing Strategy. Stud. Geophys. Geod., 48, 289-308, 2004.
13. Pail, R., and Wermuth, M. GOCE SGG and SST quick-look gravity field analysis. Advances in Geosciences, 1, 5-9, 2003.
14. Preimesberger, T, and Pail R. GOCE quick-look gravity solution: application of the semianalytic approach in the case of data gaps and non-repeat orbits. Studia geoph. et geod., 47, 435-453, 2003.
15. Rummel, R., et al. Spherical harmonic analysis of satellite gradiometry. Neth. Geod. Comm., Publications on Geodesy, 39, Delft, The Netherlands, 1993.
16. nd Internat. GOCE User Workshop, Frascati, 2004.