K-Train - A computer-based, interactive training program with an incorporated certification system for practicing kinetic perimetry: Evaluation of acceptance and success rate

Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology

Volumn 244, Issue 10, 2006, Pages 1300-1309

  Schiefer, Ulrich ^a,d   Nowomiejska, K ^a,b   Krapp, E ^a   Patzold J ^a,d   Johnson, C A ^c,e,f  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

^b MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF LUBLIN   (Poland)

^c DEVERS EYE INSTITUTE   (United States)

^d HAAG STREIT Inc   (Switzerland)

^e Welch Allyn   (United States)

^f CARL ZEISS SMT AG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Certification; Education; Kinetic perimetry; Quality control; Training

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; CERTIFICATION; COMPUTER ASSISTED PERIMETRY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; EDUCATION; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; HUMAN; KINETICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SCORING SYSTEM; VISUAL FIELD DEFECT;

ADULT; CERTIFICATION; COMPUTER-ASSISTED INSTRUCTION; EDUCATION, MEDICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OPHTHALMOLOGY; PERIMETRY; QUALITY CONTROL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TEACHING; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; VISUAL FIELD TESTS; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 33749054050     PISSN: 0721832X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00417-006-0291-9     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Anderson DR (1982) Testing the field of vision. Mosby, St. Louis
2. Canadian Medical Association (1992) Physicians' guide to driver examination. Canadian Medical Association, Ottawa
3. Egge K (1984) The visual field in normal subjects. Acta Ophthalmol Suppl 169:1-64
4. Ferree CE, Rand G, Monroe MM (1931) Diagnostic scales for the 1 degree and 0.17 degree form field stimuli for the eight principal meridional quadrants taken separately. Arch Ophthalmol 6:518-534
5. Goldmann H (1945) Grundlagen exakter Perimetrie. Ophthal 109:57-70
6. Goldmann H (1946) Demonstration unseres neuen Projektionskugelperimeters samt theoretischen und klinischen Bemerkungen über Perimetrie. Opthalmologica 11:187-192
7. Hulbert MFG (1992) Passing the DVLC field regulations following bilateral pan-retinal photocoagulation in diabetics. Eye 6:456-460
8. Johnson CA, Keltner JL (1987) Optimal rates of movement for kinetic perimetry. Arch Ophthalmol 105:73-75
9. Keltner JL, Johnson CA, Spurr JO, Beck RW (1999) Comparison of central and peripheral visual field properties in the Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial (ONTT). Am J Ophthalmol 128:543-553
10. Nowomiejska KE, Vonthein R, Krapp E, Rauscher S, Hermann A, Paetzold J, Schiefer U (2003) High resolution assessment of kinetic isopters on the stimulus size and luminance response surface. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 44 (Suppl):E 1955
11. Paetzold J, Schiller J, Rauscher S, Schiefer U (2003) A computer application for training kinetic perimetry. In: Wall M, Mills RP (eds) Perimetry update 2002/2003. Kugler, The Hague, pp 69-73
12. Parisi JL, Bell RA, Yassein H (1991) Homonymous hemianoptic field defects and driving in Canada. Can J Optom 26:252-256
13. Parrish RK, Schiffman J, Anderson DR (1984) Static and kinetic visual field testing-reproducibility in normal volunteers. Arch Ophthalmol 102:1497-1502
14. Rauscher S, Vonthein R, Sadowski B, Erdmann B, Krapp E, Schiefer U (2002) Computer-assisted kinetic perimetry (CAKP) Using the Octopus 101 perimeter: Age related normal values of local thresholds using various stimulus conditions and considering individual reaction times. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43 (12) (Suppl):3810
15. Schiefer U, Rauscher S, Hermann A, Nowomiejska KE, Sadowski B, Vonthein R, Paetzold J, Schiller J (2003) Age dependence of normative values in semi-automated kinetic perimetry (SKP) reviewing. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 44 (Suppl):E-1957
16. Schiefer U, Rauscher S, Paetzold J, Schiller J (2003) Realization of semi-automated kinetic perimetry (SKP) with the Interzeag 101 instrument. In: Wall M, Mills RP (eds) Perimetry update 2002/2003. Kugler, The Hague, pp 233-238
17. Schiefer U, Schiller J, Dietrich TJ, Besch D, Paetzold J, Vonthein R (2001) Evaluation of advanced visual field loss with computer-assisted kinetic perimetry. In: Wall M, Mills RP (eds) Perimetry update 2000/ 2001. Kugler, The Hague, pp 131-136
18. Schiefer U, Schiller J, Paetzold J, Dietrich TJ, Vonthein R, Besch D (2001) Evaluation ausgedehnter Gesichtsfelddefekte mittels computerassistierter kinetischer Perimetrie. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 218:13-20
19. Shapiro LR, Johnson CA (1990) Quantitative evaluation of manual kinetic perimetry using computer simulation. Applied Optics 29:1445-1450
20. Shapiro LR, Johnson CA (1991) Evaluation of the diagnosis of visual fields. Perimetry Update 281-285
21. Shapiro LR, Johnson CA, Kennedy RL (1989) KRAKEN. A computer simulation procedure for static, kinetic, suprathreshold static and heuristic perimetry. In: Heijl A (ed) Perimetry update 1988/89. Proceedings of the VIIIth International Perimetric Society Meeting. Kugler & Ghedini, Amsterdam
22. Verkehrskommission der DOG (2003) Empfehlung der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft und des Berufsverbandes der Augenärzte Deutschlands zur Fahreignungsbegutachtung für den Straβenverkehr. BVA
23. Wabbels BK, Kolling G (1999) Automatische kinetische Perimetrie mit dem Twinfield-Perimeter. Z Prakt Augenheilkd 20:401-406
24. Wabbels BK, Kolling G (2001) Automatische kinetische Perimetrie mit unterschiedlichen Prüfgeschwindigkeiten. Ophthalmologe 98:168-173
25. Williams TD (1983) Computer-based analysis of visual fields: Age-related norms for the central visual field. Can J Optom 45:166-170
26. Williams TD (1985) Age-related norms for the periphal visual field. Can J Optom 47:140-141
27. Williams TD (1997) Goldmann visual field norms for age groups 25 to 75 years: I-1, III-3 and III-4 targets. Can J Optom 58:170-175
28. Zehnder-Albrecht S (1950) Zur Standardisierung der Perimetrie. Ophthal 120:255-270