The role of statistical methods in assessing the evidential value of physico-chemical data;Rola metod statystycznych w oszacowaniu wartości dowodowej danych fizykochemicznych

Problems of Forensic Sciences

Volumn 65, Issue , 2006, Pages 91-103

  Zadora, Grzegorz ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF FORENSIC RESEARCH   (Poland)

Author keywords

Classification; Comparison; Forensic statistics; Glass; SEM EDX

Indexed keywords

GLASS;

CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONFERENCE PAPER; FORENSIC SCIENCE; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 34249704503     PISSN: 12307483     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Aitken C. G. G., Lucy D., Zadora G. [et al.], Evaluation of trace evidence for three-level multivariate data with the use of graphical models, Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 2006; 50, 2571-2588.
2. Aitken C. G. G., Taroni F., Statistics and the evaluation of evidence for forensic scientists, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester 2004.
3. Aitken C. G. G., Taroni F., Garbolino P., A graphical modelling for the evaluation of cross-transfer evidence in DNA profiles, Theoretical Population Biology, 2003, 63, 179-190.
4. Aitken C. G. G., Zadora G., Lucy D., A two-level model for evidence evaluation, Journal of Forensic Sciences 2007, 52, 412-419.
5. Chan K. P. S., Aitken C. G. G., Estimation of the Bayes factor in a forensic science problem, Journal of Statistical Computation and Solution 1989, 33, 249-264.
6. Curran J. M., Hicks T. N., Buckleton J. S., Forensic interpretation of glass evidence, CRC Press, Boca Ratton 2000.
7. Dawid P., Mortera J., Pascali V. L. [et al.], Probabilistics expert systems for forensic inference from genetic markers, Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 2002, 29, 577-595.
8. Evett W., A Bayesian approach to the problem of interpreting glass evidence in forensic science casework, Journal of the Forensic Science Society, 1986, 26, 3-18.
9. Evett W., Gill P. D., Jackson G. [et al.], Interpreting small quantities of DNA; the hierarchy of proposition and the use of Bayesian networks, Journal of Forensic Sciences 2002, 47, 520-530.
10. Garbolino P., Evaluation of evidence using Bayesian networks, Forensic Science International 2002, 125, 149-155.
11. Lindley D. V., A problem in forensic sciences, Biometrica 1977, 64, 207-213.
12. Lucy D., The evaluation of trace evidence in the form of multivariate data, Applied Statistics 2004, 53, 109-122.
13. Mortera J., Dawid A. P., Lauritzen S. L., Probabilistic experts system for DNA mixture profiling, Theoretical Population Biology 2003, 63, 191-205.
14. Ryland R., Statistical evidence, Chapman and Hall, London 1997.
15. Taroni F., Biedermann A., Garbolino P. [et al.], A general approach to Bayesian networks for the interpretation of evidence, Forensic Science International 2004, 139, 5-16.
16. Taroni F., Garbolino P., Bayesian Networks and the evaluation of scientific evidence: a theoretical approach, Problems of Forensic Sciences 2001, 46, 173-179.
17. www.enfsi.org.
18. Zadora G., Brożek-Mucha Z., Parczewski A., A classification of glass microtraces, Problems of Forensic Sciences 2001, 47, 137-143.
19. Zadora G., Brożek-Mucha Z., Parczewski A., A differentiation of glass microtraces of the same qualitative composition, Problems of Forensic Sciences 2001, 47, 144-146.
20. Zadora G., Glass analysis for forensic purposes - a comparison of classification methods, Journal of Chemometrics 2007, 20, 1-13.
21. th session, 2003, volume LX, book 2, 364-367.