Femoral shaft bowing influences the correction angle for high tibial osteotomy

Journal of Orthopaedic Science

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 214-218

  Nagamine, Ryuji ^a   Inoue, Sanshiro ^b   Miura, Hiromasa ^b   Matsuda, Shuichi ^b   Iwamoto, Yukihide ^b  

^a Yoshizuka Hayashi Hospital   (Japan)

^b KYUSHU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANATOMICAL VARIATION; ANTHROPOMETRIC PARAMETERS; ARTICLE; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FEMOROTIBIAL ANGLE; FEMUR SHAFT; HUMAN; JAPANESE; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; LEG; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TIBIA; TIBIA OSTEOTOMY; TIBIA SHAFT;

EID: 34249703388     PISSN: 09492658     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00776-007-1112-7     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. K Yasuda T Majima T Tsuchida K Kaneda 1992 A ten- to 15-year follow-up observation of high tibial osteotomy in medial compartment osteoarthrosis Clin Orthop 282 186 95
2. HR Choi Y Hasegawa S Kondo T Shimizu K Ida H Iwata 2001 High tibial osteotomy for varus gonarthrosis: a 10- to 24-year follow-up study J Orthop Sci 6 493 7
3. JF Rudan MA Simurda 1990 High tibial osteotomy. A prospective clinical and roentgenographic review Clin Orthop 255 251 6
4. MB Coventry DM Ilstrup SL Wallrichs 1993 Proximal tibial osteotomy: a critical long-term study of eighty-seven cases J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 75 196 201
5. P Aglietti R Buzzi LM Vena A Baldini A Mondaini 2003 High tibial valgus osteotomy for medial gonarthrosis: a 10- to 21-year study J Knee Surg 16 21 6
6. TR Sprenger JF Doerzbacher 2003 Tibial osteotomy for the treatment of varus gonarhthrosis. Survival and failure analysis to twenty-two years J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 85 469 74
7. TL Huang KF Tseng WM Chen RM Lin JJ Wu TH Chen 2005 Preoperative tibiofemoral angle predicts survival of proximal tibial osteotomy Clin Orthop 432 188 95
8. NA Sundaram JP Hallett MF Sullivan 1986 Dome osteotomy of the tibia for osteoarthritis of the knee J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 68 782 6
9. D Naudie RB Bourne CH Rorabeck TJ Bourne 1999 Survivorship of the high tibial valgus osteotomy. A 10- to 22- year follow up study Clin Orthop 367 18 27
10. JT Dearborn CL Eakin HB Skinner 1996 Medial compartment arthrosis of the knee Am J Orthop 25 18 26
11. TW Dugdale FR Noyes D Styer 1992 Pre-operative planning for high tibial osteotomy Clin Orthop 274 248 64
12. S Madan RK Ranjith NJ Fiddian 2003 Intermediate follow-up of high tibial osteotomy. A comparison of two techniques Bull Hosp Jt Dis 2002 61 11 6
13. A Nagel JN Insall GR Scuderi 1996 Proximal tibial osteotomy: a subjective outcome study J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 78 1353 8
14. K Ogata I Yoshii H Kawamura H Miura T Arizono Y Sugioka 1991 Standing radiographs cannot determine the correction in high tibial osteotomy J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 73 927 31
15. R Nagamine H Miura CV Bravo K Urabe S Matsuda K Miyanishi 2000 Anatomic variations should be considered in total knee arthroplasty J Orthop Sci 5 232 7
16. G Magyar TL Ahl P Vibe S Toksviq-Larsen A Lindstrand 1999 Open-wedge osteotomy by hemicallotasis or the closed-wedge technique for osteoarthritis of the knee. A randomized study of 50 operations J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 81 444 8
17. JR Moreland LW Bassett GJ Hanker 1987 Radiographic analysis of the axial alignment of the lower extremity J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 69 745 9
18. C Stukenborg-Colsman CJ Wirth D Lazovic A Wefer 2001 High tibial osteotomy versus unicompartmental joint replacement in unicompartmental knee joint osteoarthritis: 7-10-year follow-up prospective randomized study Knee 8 187 94