A quantitative and qualitative analysis of bone remodelling around custom uncemented femoral stems: A five-year DEXA follow-up

Clinical Biomechanics

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 277-282

  Muller, Sébastien ^a,b   Irgens, Fridtjov ^a   Aamodt, Arild ^b  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

^b TRONDHEIM UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

Author keywords

DEXA; Femoral; Predictor; Qualitative; Remodelling

Indexed keywords

ABSORPTION; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; IMPLANTS (SURGICAL); PATIENT MONITORING; PHYSIOLOGICAL MODELS; PROSTHETICS; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS; X RAY ANALYSIS;

FEMUR; HIP REPLACEMENT BONE REMODELING; IMPLANT SURVIVAL; STRUCTURAL REMODELING;

BONE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BONE DENSITY; BONE MINERAL; BONE PROSTHESIS; BONE REMODELING; BONE STRUCTURE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DUAL ENERGY X RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY; FEMALE; FEMUR; FOLLOW UP; GEOMETRY; HIP; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; OSTEOLYSIS; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;

ADULT; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; BONE REMODELING; CEMENTATION; DENSITOMETRY; DENSITOMETRY, X-RAY; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FEMUR; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROGNOSIS; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 13844253949     PISSN: 02680033     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2004.10.007     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. H. Brockstedt, M. Kassem, E.F. Eriksen, L. Mosekilde, and F. Melsen Age- and sex-related changes in iliac cortical bone mass and remodeling Bone 30 1991 681 691
2. J.C. Clohisy, and W.H. Harris The Harris-Galante uncemented femoral component in primary total hip replacement at 10 years J. Arthroplasty. 14 1999 915 917
3. B. Cohen, and N. Rushton Accuracy of DEXA measurement of bone mineral density after total hip arthroplasty J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 77 1995 479 483
4. L.D. Dorr, K. Lewonowski, M. Lucero, M. Harris, and Z. Wan Failure mechanisms of anatomic porous replacement I cementless total hip replacement Clin. Orthop. 334 1997 157 167
5. C. Eingartner, R. Volkmannm, E. Winter, F. Maurer, G. Sauer, S. Weller, and K. Weise Results of an uncemented straight femoral shaft prosthesis after 9 years of follow-up J. Arthroplasty. 15 2000 440 447
6. C.A. Engh, T.F. McGovern, J.D. Bobyn, and W.H. Harris A quantitative evaluation of periprosthetic bone-remodeling after cementless total hip arthroplasty J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 74 1992 1009 1020
7. A. Georges, N. Barthe, F. Castaing, B. Basse-Cathalinat, and L. Bordenave Evaluation biologique et densitometrique du remodelage osseux induit par l'arthroplastie totale de hanche Ann. Biol. Clin. (Paris) 24 2002 683 688
8. B. Groessner-Schreiber, M. Krukowski, C. Lyons, and P. Osdoby Osteoclast recruitment in response to human bone matrix is age related Mech. Ageing Dev. 62 1992 143 154
9. M.L. Hall, J. Heavens, and P.J. Ell Variation between femurs as measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) Eur. J. Nucl. Med. 18 1991 38 40
10. K.S. Keisu, E.B. Mathiesen, and J.U. Lindgren The uncemented fully textured Lord hip prosthesis: a 10- to 15-year followup study Clin. Orthop. 382 2001 133 142
11. D.J. Kilgus, E.E. Shimaoka, J.S. Tipton, and R.W. Eberle Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurement of bone mineral density around porous-coated cementless femoral implants. Methods and preliminary results J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 75 1993 279 287
12. H. Kröger, H. Miettinen, I. Arnala, E. Koski, N. Rushton, and O. Suomalainen Evaluation of periprosthetic bone using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry: precision of the method and effect of operation on bone mineral density J. Bone Miner. Res. 11 1996 1526 1530
13. T.A. Larnach, S.J. Boyd, R.C. Smart, S.P. Butler, P.G. Rohl, and T.H. Diamond Reproducibility of lateral spine scans using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry Calcif. Tissue Int. 51 1992 255 258
14. M.G. Li, and K.G. Nilsson Changes in bone mineral density at the proximal tibia after total knee arthroplasty: a 2-year follow-up of 28 knees using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry J. Orthop. Res. 18 2000 40 47
15. L. Massari, B. Bagni, R. Biscione, and G.C. Traina Periprosthetic bone density in uncemented femoral hip implants with proximal hydroxylapatite coating Bull. Hosp. J. Dis. 77 1995 206 210
16. E.S. Mortimer, L. Rosenthall, I. Paterson, and J.D. Bobyn Effect of rotation on periprosthetic bone mineral measurements in a hip phantom Clin. Orthop. 324 1996 269 274
17. A.I. Rahmy, T. Gosens, G.M. Blake, A. Tonino, and I. Fogelman Periprosthetic bone remodelling of two types of uncemented femoral implant with proximal hydroxyapatite coating: a 3-year follow-up study addressing the influence of prosthesis design and preoperative bone density on periprosthetic bone loss Osteoporos Int. 15 2004 281 289
18. C.J. Sychterz, and C.A. Engh The influence of clinical factors on periprosthetic bone remodeling Clin. Orthop. 322 1996 285 292