Phase II trial to evaluate the ActiGait implanted drop-foot stimulator in established hemiplegia

Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine

Volumn 39, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 212-218

  Burridge, Jane ^c   Haugland, Morten ^a   Larsen, Birgit ^a,b   Pickering, Ruth M ^c   Svaneborg, Niels ^d   Iversen, Helle K ^e   Christensen, P Brøgger ^f   Haase, Jens ^b   Brennum, Jannick ^e   Sinkjaer, Thomas ^b  

^a Neurodan A/S   (Denmark)

^b AALBORG UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^d Sygehus Vendsyssel   (Denmark)

^e UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^f Hammel Neuro Center   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Electrical stimulation; Implanted electrodes; Rehabilitation; Stroke and gait

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENMARK; ELECTRODE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FUNCTIONAL ELECTRICAL STIMULATION; GAIT DISORDER; HEMIPLEGIA; HUMAN; MALE; NERVE CONDUCTION; PERONEUS NERVE; PHASE 2 CLINICAL TRIAL; RANGE OF MOTION; REHABILITATION CENTER; SAFETY; TIBIALIS ANTERIOR MUSCLE; WALKING; WALKING SPEED; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; ELECTROSTIMULATION THERAPY; FOOT; GAIT; INNERVATION; INSTRUMENTATION; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STANDARD;

AGED; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; ELECTRIC STIMULATION THERAPY; ELECTRODES, IMPLANTED; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; FOOT; GAIT; HEMIPLEGIA; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SAFETY; WALKING;

EID: 34249687116     PISSN: 16501977     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2340/16501977-0039     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Burridge JH, McLellan DL. Relation between abnormal patterns of muscle activation and response to common peroneal nerve stimulation in hemiplegia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2000; 69: 353-361.
2. Karsnia A, Dillner S, Ebefors I, Lundmark P. Why patients use or reject a peroneal muscle stimulator. Advances in External Control of Human Extremities 1990; 251-260.
3. Burridge JH, Taylor PN, Hagan SA, Wood DE, Swain ID. The effects of common peroneal stimulation on the effort and speed of walking: a randomized controlled trial with chronic hemiplegic patients. Clin Rehabil 1997; 11: 201-210,
4. Taylor PN, Burridge JH, Dunkerley AL, Wood DE, Norton JA, Singleton C, et al. Clinical use of the Odstock Dropped Foot Stimulator. Its effect on speed and effort of walking. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999; 80: 1577-1583.
5. Glanz M, Klawansky S, Stason W, Berkey C, Chalmers TC. Functional electrical stimulation in post-stroke rehabilitation: a meta-analysis of the randomised controlled trials. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996; 77: 549-553.
6. Wieler M, Stein RB, Ladouceur M, Whittaker M, Smith AW, Naaman S, et al. Multicenter evaluation of electrical stimulation systems for walking. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999; 80: 495-500.
7. Taylor PN, Burridge JH, Dunkerley AL, Lamb A, Wood DE, Norton JA, et al. Patients' perceptions of the Odstock Dropped Foot Stimulator (ODFS). Clin Rehabil 1999; 13: 439-446.
8. Waters RL, McNeal DR, Faloon W, Clifford B. Functional electrical stimulation of the peroneal nerve for hemiplegia. Long-term clinical follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1985; 67: 792-793.
9. Rozman J, Acimovic-Janezic R, Tekavcic I, Kljajic M, Trlep M. Implantable stimulator for selective stimulation of the common peroneal nerve: a preliminary report. J Med Eng Tech 1994; 18: 47-53.
10. Lyons GM, Sinkjaer T, Burridge JH, Wilcox DJ. A review of portable FES-based neural orthoses for the correction of drop foot. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2002; 10: 260-279.
11. Kenney L, Bultstra G, Buschman R, Taylor P, Mann G, Hermens H, et al. An implantable two channel drop foot stimulator: initial clinical results. Artif Organs 2002; 26: 267-270.
12. Kottink AIR, Buschman R, Kenney L, Veltink PH, Slycke P. The sensitivity and selectivity of an implantable two-channel peroneal nerve stimulator system for restoration of dropped foot. Neuromodulation 2004; 7: 277-283.
13. Pohl PS, Duncan PW, Perera S, Liu W, Lai SM, Studenski S, et al. Influence of stroke-related impairments on performance in 6-minute walk test. J Rehabil Res Develop 2002; 39: 439-444.
14. Butland RJ, Pang J, Gross ER, Woodcock AA, Geddes DM. Two-, six-, and 12-minute walking tests in respiratory disease. BMJ (Clin Res Ed) 1982; 29: 284 (6329): 1607-1608.
15. Wade DT, Wood VA, Heller A, Maggs J, Hewer RL. Walking after stroke. Measurement and recovery over the first 3 months. Scand J Rehabil Med 1987; 19: 25-30.
16. Jay A, Liveson DMM, editors. Laboratory reference for clinical neurophysiology. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis company, 1992.
17. Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, Wagenaar RC, Long term effects of intensity of upper and lower limb training after stroke: a randomised trial. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2002; 72: 473-479.
18. Law M, Polatajko H, Pollock N, McColl MA, Carswell A, Baptiste S. Pilot testing of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure: clinical and measurement issues. Can J Occup Ther 1994; 61: 191-197.
19. Law M, Baptiste S, McColl MA, Opzoomer A, Polatajko H, Pollock N. The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure: an outcome measure for occupational therapy. Can J Occup Ther 1990; 57: 82-87.
20. McColl MA, Doubt L, Paterson M, Law M. Validity and community utility of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Can J Occup Ther 2000; 67: 22-30.
21. Esnouf JE, Taylor PN, editors. Does the Canadian occupational performance measure determine if the Odstock Drop Foot Stimulator improves activities of daily living for people with multiple sclerosis. Proceedings of the 9th Annual IFESS Conference 6-7 September 2004, Bournemouth UK, pp. 267-269. ISBN 1-85899-191-9.