Dynamics of a quantum reference frame

New Journal of Physics

Volumn 9, Issue , 2007, Pages

  Poulin, David ^a   Yard, Jon ^b  

^a CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONSERVATION LAWS; POLARIZED PARTICLES; QUANTUM CHANNELS;

ANGULAR MOMENTUM; PARTICLES (PARTICULATE MATTER); POLARIZATION; QUANTUM THEORY; SPIN DYNAMICS;

GYROSCOPES;

EID: 34249660072     PISSN: 13672630     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/9/5/156     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Aharonov Y and Bohm D1961 Time in the quantum theory and the uncertainty relation for time and energy Phys. Rev. 122 1649-58
2. Aharonov Y and Kaufherr T 1984 Quantum frames of reference Phys. Rev. D 30 368
3. Andersen P W 1972 More is different Science 177 393
4. Aharonov Y and Susskind L 1967 Charge superselection rule Phys. Rev. 155 1428
5. Araki H and Yanase M 1960 Measurement of quantum mechanical operators Phys. Rev. 120 622
6. Bergmann P G 1961 Observables in general relativity Rev. Mod. Phys. 33 510-14
7. Bartlett S D, Rudolph T and Spekkens R W 2004 Optimal measurements for relative quantum information Phys. Rev. A 70 32321
8. Bartlett S D, Rudolph T and Spekkens R W 2006 Dialogue concerning two views on quantum coherences: factist and fictionist Int. J. Quantum Inform. 4 17
9. Bartlett S, Rudolph T and Spekkens R 2007 Reference frames, superselection rules, and quantum information Rev. Mod. Phys. 79 555 (Preprint quant-ph/0610030)
10. Bartlett S D, Rudolph T, Sanders B C and Turner P S 2006 Degradation of a quantum directional reference frame as a random walk Preprint quant-ph/0607107
11. Bartlett S D, Rudolph T, Spekkens R W and Turner P S 2006 Degradation of a quantum reference frame New J. Phys. 8 58 (Preprint quant-ph/0602069)
12. Gambini R, Porto R and Pullin J 2004 A relational solution to the problem of time in quantum mechanics and quantum gravity induces a fundamental mechanism for decoherence New J. Phys. 6 45 (Preprint gr-qc/0402118)
13. Kitaev A, Mayers D and Preskill J 2004 Superselection rules and quantum protocols Phys. Rev. A 69 52326
14. Leggett A J 2001 Bose-Einstein condensation in the alkali gases: Some fundamental concepts Rev. Mod. Phys. 73 307
15. Milburn G J 1991 Intrinsic decoherence in quantum mechanics Phys. Rev. A 44 5401-6
16. Mølmer K 1997 Optical coherence: a convenient fiction Phys. Rev. A 55 3195
17. Milburn G J and Poulin D 2006 Relational time for systems of oscillators Int. J. Quantum Inform. 4 151 (Preprint quant-ph/050517)
18. Poulin D 2006 Toy model for a relational formulation of quantum theory Int. J. Theor. Phys. 45 1229 (Preprint quant-ph/0505081)
19. Peres A and Scudo P F 2001 Entangled quantum states as direction indicators Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 4160
20. Page D N and Wootters W K 1983 Evolution without evolution: dynamics described by stationary observables Phys. Rev. D 27 2885
21. Rugar D, Budakian R, Mamin H and Chui B 2004 Single spin detection by magnetic resonance force microscopy Nature 430 329
22. Ritter W 2005 Quantum channels and representation theory J. Math. Phys. 46 082103
23. Rovelli C 1991 What is observable in classical and quantum gravity Class. Quantum Grav. 8 297
24. Sakurai J 1994 Modern quantum mechanics (Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley) see section 3.8
25. Shor P W 1996 Fault-tolerant quantum computation Proc. 37th Symp. on the Foundations of Computer Science (Los Alamitos, California) (Piscataway, NJ: IEEE press) pp 56-65 (Preprint quant-ph/9605011)
26. Wrobel J, Dietl T, Lusakowski A, Grabecki G, Fronc K, Hey R, Ploog K H and Shtrikman H 2004 Spin filtering in a hybrid ferromagnetic-semiconductor microstructure Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 246601
27. Wigner E 1952 Die messung quantenmechanischer operatoren Z. Phys. 131 101