Rule identification using ontology while acquiring rules from Web pages

International Journal of Human Computer Studies

Volumn 65, Issue 7, 2007, Pages 659-673

  Park, Sangun ^a   Lee, Jae Kyu ^b,c  

^a Kyonggi University   (South Korea)

^b Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST)   (South Korea)

^c SINGAPORE MANAGEMENT UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Knowledge acquisition; Ontology; Ontology engineering; Rule acquisition; Rule identification; RuleML; XML; XRML

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES; INTELLIGENT AGENTS; KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION; SEMANTIC WEB; WEBSITES;

RULE ACQUISITION; RULE IDENTIFICATION; RULEML; XRML;

ONTOLOGY;

EID: 34249323408     PISSN: 10715819     EISSN: 10959300     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2007.02.004     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Alani H., Kim S., Millard D.E., Weal M.J., Hall W., Lewis P.H., and Shadbolt N.R. Automatic ontology-based knowledge extraction from Web documents. IEEE Intelligent Systems 18 1 (2003) 14-21
2. Baader F., and Nutt W. Basic description logics. In: Baader F., Calvanese D., McGuinness D., Nardi D., and Patel-Schneider P.F. (Eds). The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation, and Applications (2003), Cambridge University Press 43-95
3. Babowal, D., Joerg, W., 1999. From information to knowledge: introducing Webstract's knowledge engineering Approach. In: Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering, Edmonton, Alberta, pp. 1525-1530.
4. Bontcheva K., Tablan V., Maynard D., and Cunningham H. Evolving GATE to meet new challenges in language engineering. Natural Language Engineering 10 3 (2004) 349-473
5. Brickley, D., Guha, R.V., 2004. RDF Vocabulary Description Language 1.0: RDF Schema. W3C Recommendation, 〈http://www.w3c.org/TR/rdf-schema/〉.
6. Brockmans, S., Volz, R., Eberhart, A., Loffler, P., 2004. Visual modeling of OWL DL ontologies using UML. In: Proceedings of 3rd International Semantic Web Conference, Hiroshima, Japan, pp. 198-213.
7. Chan K., and Lam W. Extracting causation knowledge from natural language texts. International Journal of Intelligent Systems 20 3 (2005) 327-358
8. Connolly, D., van Harmelen, F., Horrocks, I., McGuiness, D.L., Patel-Schneider, P.F., Stein, L.A., 2001. DAML+OIL Reference Description, W3C Note, 〈http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/NOTE-daml+oil-reference-20011218〉.
9. Craven M., DiPasquo D., Freitag D., McCallum A., Mitchell T., Nigam K., and Slattery S. Learning to construct knowledge bases from the World Wide Web. Artificial Intelligence 118 1-2 (2000) 69-113
10. Crow L., and Shadbolt N. Extracting focused knowledge from the Semantic Web. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 54 (2001) 155-184
11. Delgado M., Martin-Bautista M.J., Sanchez D., Serrano J.M., and Vila M.A. Association rule extraction for text mining. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2522 (2002) 154-162
12. Donini F.M., Lenzerini M., Nardi D., and Schaerf A. Reasoning in description logics. In: Brweka G. (Ed). Principles of Knowledge Representation (1996), CSLI Publications 191-238
13. Dzbor M., Domingue J., and Motta E. Magpie-towards a Semantic Web browser. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2870 (2003) 690-705
14. Feldman, R., Dagan, I., 1995. KDT-knowledge discovery in texts. In: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Knowledge Discovery (KDD), pp. 112-117.
15. van Heijst G., Schreiber A.Th., and Wielinga B.J. Using explicit ontologies in KBS development. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 45 (1997) 183-292
16. Harmelen, F., van Fensel, D., 1999. Practical knowledge representation for the Web. In: Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Stockholm, Sweden.
17. Hemnani A., and Bressan S. Extracting information from semi-structured Web documents. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2426 (2002) 166-175
18. Horrocks I. DAML+OIL: a description logic for the Semantic Web. IEEE Data Engineering 25 1 (2002) 4-9
19. Horrocks, I., Patel-Schneider, P.F., Boley, H., Tabet, S., Grosof, B., Dean, M., 2004. SWRL: a Semantic Web rule language combining OWL and RuleML, W3C Member Submission, 〈http://www.w3.org/Submission/2004/SUBM-SWRL-20040521/〉.
20. Hulth, A., Karlgren, J., Jonsson, A., Bostrom, H., Asker, L., 2001. Automatic keyword extraction using domain knowledge. In: Proceedings of the Second Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing, Mexico, pp. 472-482.
21. Kang J., and Lee J.K. Rule identification from Web pages by the xrml approach. Decision Support Systems 41 1 (2005) 205-227
22. Kiryakov A., Popov B., Terziev I., Manov D., and Ognyanoff D. Semantic annotation, indexing, and retrieval. Web Semantics 2 1 (2004) 49-79
23. Knublauch H., Fergerson R.W., Noy N.F., and Musen M.A. The Protégé OWL plugin: an open development environment for Semantic Web applications. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3298 (2004) 229-243
24. Kopena J., and Regli W.C. DAMLJessKB: a tool for reasoning with the Semantic Web. IEEE Intelligent Systems 18 3 (2003) 74-77
25. Lebbink, H.J., Witteman, C.L.M., Meyer, J.-J.Ch., 2002. Ontology based knowledge acquisition for knowledge system. In: Proceedings of the 14th Dutch-Belgian Artificial Intelligence Conference, Leuven, Belgium, pp. 195-202.
26. Lee J.K., and Sohn M. Extensible Rule Markup Language-toward intelligent Web platform. Communications of the ACM 46 (2003) 59-64
27. Liebig T., and Noppens O. ONTOTRACK: combining browsing and editing with reasoning and explaining for OWL lite ontologies. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2870 (2004) 244-258
28. Maedche A., and Staab S. Mining ontologies from Text. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 1937 (2000) 189-202
29. Manola, F., Miller, E., 2004. Resource Description Framework (RDF) Primer. W3C Recommendation, 〈http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-rdf-syntax/〉.
30. Miller G.A. WordNet a lexical database for English. Communications of the ACM 38 11 (1995) 39-41
31. Mukherjee S., Yang G., and Ramakrishnan I.V. Automatic annotation of content-rich HTML documents: structural and Semantic analysis. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2870 (2003) 533-549
32. Perrin P., and Petry F.E. Document title extraction and representation of contextual information for knowledge discovery in texts. Information Sciences 151 (2003) 125-152
33. Popov B., Kiryakov A., Ognyanoff D., Manov D., and Kirilov A. KIM-a Semantic platform for information extraction and retrieval. Natural language Engineering 10 3/4 (2004) 375-392
34. Ruiz-Sánchez J.M., Valencia-García R., Fernández-Breis J.T., Martínez-Béjar R., and Compton P. An approach for incremental knowledge acquisition from text. Expert System with Applications 25 1 (2003) 77-86
35. Rule, M.L., 2003. The Rule Markup Initiative, 〈http://www.dfki.uni-kl.de/ruleml/〉.
36. Smith, M.K., Welty, C., McGuinness, D., 2004. OWL Web Ontology Language Guide. W3C Recommendation, 〈http://www.w3c.org/TR/owl-guide/〉.
37. Suraweera, P., Mitrovic, A., Martin, B., 2004. The role of domain ontology in knowledge acquisition for ITSs. In: Proceedings of Intelligent Tutoring Systems, pp. 207-216.
38. Tang Y.Y., Yan C.D., and Suen C.Y. Document processing for automatic knowledge acquisition. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering Archive 6 1 (1994) 3-21
39. Vargas-Vera, M., Motta, E., Domingue, J., Shum, S.B., Lanzoni, M., 2001. knowledge extraction by using an ontology-based annotation tool, In: Proceedings of the Knowledge Markup and Semantic Annotation Workshop, Canada.