Intervention effects on NPIs and feature movement: Towards a unified account of intervention

Natural Language Semantics

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 359-398

  Guerzoni, Elena ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Disjunction; Feature movement; Indefinites; Interrogatives; Intervention effects; Negative polarity items

Indexed keywords

EID: 34249320845     PISSN: 0925854X     EISSN: 1572865X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11050-007-9008-9     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Aoun, J., & Hornstein, N. (1985). Quantifiers types. Linguistic Inquiry, 76(4), 623-637.
2. Beck, S. (1996a). Quantified structures as barriers for LF-movement. Natural Language Semantics, 4, 1-56.
3. Beck, S. (1996b). Wh-constructions and transparent logical form. PhD dissertation, Universität Tübingen.
4. Bruening, B. (2001). QR obeys superiority: ACD and frozen scope. Linguistic Inquiry, 32(2), 233-273.
5. Chierchia, G. (2004). Scalar implicatures, polarity phenomena and the syntax/pragmatics interface. In A. Belletti (Ed.), Structures and beyond: The cartography of syntactic structures, (Vol. 3, pp. 39-103). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6. Chierchia, G. (2005). Broaden your views. Implicatures of domain widening and the 'logicality' of language. Unpublished manuscript. Milan: University of Bicocca.
7. Chomsky, N. (1995). The minimalist program. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
8. Dayal, V. (1998). Any as inherently modal. Linguistics and Philosophy, 21, 433-476.
9. von Fintel, K. (1999). NPI-licensing, Strawson-entailment and context dependency. Journal of Semantics, 16(2), 97-148.
10. Fox, D. (1999). Focus, parallelism and accommodation. Paper presented at the 9th conference on semantics and linguistic theory, UC Santa Cruz, February 1999.
11. Giannakidou, A. (1997). The landscape of polarity items. PhD dissertation, University of Groningen (Published by GRODIL, Groningen).
12. Guerzoni, E. (2003). Why even ask? On the pragmatics of questions and the semantics of answers. PhD Dissertation, MIT.
13. Heim, I. (1982). The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst (Published by GLSA, Amherst, Mass.).
14. Heim, I. (1984). A note on negative polarity and downward entailingness. In C. Jones & P. Sells (Eds.), Proceedings of the 14th North Eastern Linguistic Society meeting (pp. 98-107). Amherst: GLSA.
15. Honcoop, M. (1998). Dynamic excursions on weak islands. PhD Dissertation, Universiteit Leiden. Available at: http://www.ulcl.leidenuniv.nl/content_docs/ faculty/honcoop.
16. Kadmon, N., & Landman, F. (1993). Any. Linguistics and Philosophy, 15, 353-422.
17. Karttunen, L. (1977). Syntax and semantics of questions. Linguistics and Philosophy, 1(3), 3-44.
18. Karttunen, L., & Peters, S. (1979).Cnventional implicature. In Syntax and semantics 11: Presuppositions (pp. 1-56).
19. Kelepir, M. (2000). Scope of negation: Evidence from Turkish NPIs and quantifiers. Paper presented at the 2nd Generative Linguistics of the Old World meeting (GLOW) in Asia, Nagoya, Japan, September 2000.
20. Kennedy, C. (1997). Antecedent contained deletion and the syntax of quantification. Linguistic Inquiry, 28, 662-688.
21. Kim, S-S. (2002). Focus matters: Two types of intervention effects. Paper presented at the 21st West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, UC, Santa Cruz, April 2002.
22. Kratzer, A., & Shimoyama, J. (2002). Indeterminate noun phrases: The view form Japanese. Paper presented at The 3rd Tokyo conference on psycholinguistics, Tokyo, 2000.
23. Krifka, M. (1995). The semantics and pragmatics of polarity items. Linguistic Analysis, 25(3-4), 209-257.
24. Kroch, A. S. (1974). The semantics of scope in English. PhD Dissertation, MIT (Published by MITWPL, Cambridge, Mass.).
25. Ladusaw, W. (1979). Polarity sensitivity as inherent scope relation. PhD Dissertation, University of Texas.
26. Lahiri, U. (1998). Focus and negative polarity in Hindi. Natural Language Semantics, 6, 57-123.
27. Larson, R. (1985). On the syntax of disjunction scope. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 3, 217-264.
28. Larson, R., & May, R. (1990). Antecedent containment or vacuous movement: Reply to Baltin. Linguistic Inquiry, 21, 103-122.
29. Linebarger, M. C. (1981). The grammar of negative polarity. PhD dissertation, MIT (Published by MITWPL. Cambridge, Mass).
30. Linebarger, M. C. (1987). Negative polarity and grammatical representation. Linguistics and Philosophy, 10, 325-387.
31. Pesetsky, D. (2000). Phrasal movement and its kin. Cambridge Mass: MIT Press.
32. Progovaè, L. (1994). Negative and positive polarity: A binding approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33. Rooth, M. (1985). Association with focus. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst (Published by GLSA, Amherst, Mass).
34. Rooth, M., & Partee, B. (1982). Conjunction, type ambiguity and wide scope or. In D. Flickinger, M. Macken, & N. Wiegand (Eds.), Proceedings of the 1st West Coast conference on formal linguistics (pp. 353-362). Somerville: Cascadilla Press.
35. Ruys, E. (1993). The scope of indefinites. PhD dissertation, Universiteit Utrecht.
36. Sag, I. (1976). Deletion and logical form. PhD dissertation, MIT (Published by MITWPL, Cambridge, Mass).
37. Sauerland, U. (2004). Scalar implicatures in complex sentences. Linguistics and Philosophy, 27, 367-391.
38. Sohn, K.-W. (1995). Negative polarity items. Scope and economy. PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut.
39. Valencia, V. S. (1996). Polarity, predicates and monotonicity. Unpublished manuscript, Universiteit Groningen.
40. Winter, Y. (2000). On some scopal asymmetries of coordination. In H. Bennis & M. Everaert (Eds.), Interface strategies. Amsterdam: KNAW.
41. Zwarts, F. (1996). Facets of negation. In J. Van der Does & J. Van Eijk (Eds.), Quantifiers, logic and language (pp. 385-421). Stanford: CSLI.