Urban layout, landscape features and pedestrian usage

Landscape and Urban Planning

Volumn 81, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 225-234

  Foltête, Jean Christophe ^a   Piombini, Arnaud ^a  

^a Diplômée   (France)

Author keywords

Accessibility; Landscape preference; Movement; Space syntax

Indexed keywords

BUILDINGS; CORRELATION METHODS; FOOTBRIDGES; INTEGRATION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; ROADS AND STREETS;

COMMERCIAL FUNCTION; LANDSCAPE FEATURES; PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC; SPACE SYNTAX;

URBAN PLANNING;

ACCESSIBILITY; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; CONDITION FACTOR; LANDSCAPE; PEDESTRIAN; PREFERENCE BEHAVIOR; URBAN DESIGN; WALKING;

EURASIA; EUROPE; FRANCE; LILLE; NORD [NORD-PAS-DE-CALAIS]; NORD-PAS-DE-CALAIS; WESTERN EUROPE;

EID: 34249300870     PISSN: 01692046     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.12.001     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Alfonzo M.A. To walk or not to walk? The hierarchy of walking needs. Environ. Behav. 37 6 (2005) 808-836
2. Antupit S., Gray B., and Woods S. Steps ahead: making streets that work in Seattle, Washington. Landscape Urban Plann. 35 (1996) 107-122
3. Arthur S.M., Manly B.F.J., McDonald L.L., and Garner C.W. Assessing habitat when availability changes. Ecology 77 (1996) 215-227
4. Batty, M., 2004. A New Theory of Space Syntax, CASA Working Papers Series, vol. 75. University College London. http://www.casa.ucl.ac.uk/publications/workingPaperDetail.asp?ID=75
5. Borgers A., and Timmermans H. A model of pedestrian route choice and demand for retail facilities within inner-city shopping areas. Geogr. Anal. 18 (1986) 115-128
6. Brossard T., and Wieber J.C. Le paysage: trois définitions, un mode d'analyse et de cartographie. Espace Geogr. 13 1 (1984) 5-12
7. Cervero R., and Kockelman K. Travel demand and the 3Ds: density, diversity, and design. Transp. Res. Part D 3 (1997) 199-219
8. Chang D. Spatial choice and preference in multilevel movement networks. Environ. Behav. 34 5 (2002) 582-615
9. Desyllas J., and Duxbury E. Axial maps and visibility analysis. Proceedings of the Third International Space Syntax Symposium, vol. 27. Atlanta (2001). http://undertow.arch.gatech.edu/homepages/3sss/papers_pdf/27_desyllas.pd f http://undertow.arch.gatech.edu/homepages/3sss/papers_pdf/27_desyllas.pd f
10. Genre-Grandpierre, C., Foltête, J.C., 2003. Morphologie urbaine et mobilité en marche à pied. Cybergéo 248, http://193.55.107.45/articles/248res.htm.
11. Guérin-Pace F. Vers une typologie des territoires urbains de proximité. Espace Géogr. 4 (2003) 333-344
12. Handy S. Methodologies for exploring the link between urban form and travel behaviour. Transp. Res. Part D 1 2 (1996) 151-165
13. Helbing D., Keltsch J., and Molnar P. Modelling the evolution of human trail systems. Nature 388 (1997) 47-50
14. Helbing D., Molnar P., Farkas I., and Bolay K. Self-organizing pedestrian movement. Environ. Plann. B: Plann. Des. 28 (2001) 361-383
15. Hillier B., and Hanson J. The Social Logic of Space (1984), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
16. Hillier B., Penn A., Hanson J., Grajewski T., and Xu J. Natural movement: or, configuration and attraction in urban pedestrian movement. Environ. Plann. B: Plann. Des. 20 (1993) 29-66
17. Hjermann D.Ø. Analyzing habitat selection in animals without well-defined homes ranges. Ecology 81 (2000) 1462-1468
18. Jiang B., and Claramunt C. Integration of Space Syntax into GIS: new perspectives for urban morphology. Trans. GIS 6 3 (2002) 295-309
19. Jiang B., Claramunt C., and Batty M. Geometric accessibility and geographic information: extending desktop GIS to space syntax. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 23 (1999) 127-146
20. Julien A., and Carré J. La marche dans les déplacements quotidiens des citadins. In: Pumain D., and Mattei M.F. (Eds). Données urbaines vol. 4 (2003), Anthropos, Paris 87-95
21. Kaufmann V. Mobilités quotidiennes et dynamiques urbaines (2000), Presses polytechniques et universitaires romandes, Lausanne
22. Kasemsook A. Spatial and functional differentiation: a symbiotic and systematic relationship. Proceedings of the Fourth International Space Syntax Symposium, vol. 11. London (2003). http://www.spacesyntax.net/symposia/SSS4/fullpapers/11Kasemsookpaper.pdf http://www.spacesyntax.net/symposia/SSS4/fullpapers/11Kasemsookpaper.pdf
23. Lille Métropole, 1999. Les déplacements urbains dans la métropole lilloise. Mission PDU de Lille Métropole.
24. Loiteron D., and Bishop I. Simulating visitor movement: autonomous agents in urban public garden. CUPUM'05: Computers in Urban Planning and Urban Management (2005), University College of London. http://128.40.111.250/cupum/searchpapers/index.asp 29 June-1 July. http://128.40.111.250/cupum/searchpapers/index.asp
25. Lynch K. The Image of the City (1960), M.I.T. Press, Cambridge
26. Major M.D. The use of "Space Syntax" as an interactive design tool in urban development. Plann. Forum 6 (2000) 40-56
27. Mangin, D., Panerai, P., 1999. Projet urbain, Parenthèses, Marseille.
28. Marchand B. Pedestrian traffic planning and perception of the urban environment: a French example. Environ. Plann. A 6 (1974) 491-507
29. Matthiopoulos J. The use of space by animals as a function of accessibility and preference. Ecol. Model. 159 (2003) 239-268
30. McFadden, D., 2000, Disaggregate behavioural travel demand's RUM side: a 30-year retrospective. In: Hensher D.A. (Dir.), Travel Behaviour Research, The Leading Edge. Amsterdam, Pergamon, pp. 17-63.
31. Naderi J.R., and Raman B. Capturing impressions of pedestrian landscapes used for healing purposes with decision tree learning. Landscape Urban Plann. 73 (2005) 155-166
32. Norberg-Schulz, C., 1997. L'art du lieu: architecture et paysage, permanence et mutations. Le Moniteur, Paris.
33. Parsons Brinkerhoff Quade and Douglas, Inc., 1993. Volume 4A: The Pedestrian Environment. LUTRAQ Project, 1000 Friends of Oregon, Portland.
34. Peponis J., Ross C., and Rashid M. The structure of urban space, movement and co-presence: the case of Atlanta. Geoforum 28 3-4 (1997) 341-358
35. Pettit C., Cartwright W., and Berry M. Imagining the future using 3D geographical visualisation. CUPUM'05: Computers in Urban Planning and Urban Management (2005), University College of London. http://128.40.111.250/cupum/searchpapers/index.asp 29 June-1 July. http://128.40.111.250/cupum/searchpapers/index.asp
36. Purcell A.T., and Lamb R.J. Preference and naturalness: an ecological approach. Landscape Urban Plann. 42 (1998) 57-66
37. Ratti C. Space syntax: some inconsistencies. Environ. Plann. B: Plann. Des. 31 (2004) 487-499
38. Ribeiro L., and Barão T. Greenways for recreation and maintenance of landscape quality: five case studies in Portugal. Landscape Urban Plann. 76 (2006) 79-97
39. Rodriguez D.A., and Joo J. The relationship between non-motorized mode choice and the local physical environment. Transp. Res. Part D 9 2 (2004) 151-173
40. Røe P.G. Qualitative research on intra-urban travel: an alternative approach. J. Transp. Geogr. 8 2 (2000) 99-106
41. Seneviratne P.N., and Morrall J.F. Analysis of factors affecting the choice of route of pedestrians. Transp. Plann. Technol. 10 (1985) 147-159
42. Shriver K. Influence of environmental design on pedestrian travel behaviour in four Austin neighborhoods. Transp. Res. Rec. 1578 (1997) 64-75
43. Yamano T., and Yoshikawa S. Cityscape analysis and simulation with three-dimensional urban model. CUPUM'05: Computers in Urban Planning and Urban Management (2005), University College of London. http://128.40.111.250/cupum/searchpapers/index.asp 29 June-1 July. http://128.40.111.250/cupum/searchpapers/index.asp
44. Zacharias J. Exploratory spatial behaviour in real and virtual environments. Landscape Urban Plann. 78 (2006) 1-13
45. Zacharias J. Preferences for view corridors through the urban environment. Landscape Urban Plann. 43 (1999) 217-225
46. Zacharias J. The impact of layout and visual stimuli on the itineraries and perception of pedestrians in a public market. Environ. Plann. B: Plann. Des. 24 (1997) 23-35
47. Zachariadis V. An agent-based approach to the simulation of pedestrian movement and factors that control it. CUPUM'05: Computers in Urban Planning and Urban Management (2005), University College of London. http://128.40.111.250/cupum/searchpapers/index.asp 29 June-1 July. http://128.40.111.250/cupum/searchpapers/index.asp