Analyzing and visualizing criminal network dynamics: A case study

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 3073, Issue , 2004, Pages 359-377

  Xu, Jennifer ^a   Marshall, Byron ^a   Kaza, Siddharth ^a   Chen, Hsinchun ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMATION; DYNAMICS; NATIONAL SECURITY; SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE);

CRIME INVESTIGATION; CRIMINAL NETWORKS; CRIMINAL PROSECUTIONS; DOMAIN EXPERTS; EVOLUTION PROCESS; FIELD STUDIES; PROTOTYPE SYSTEM;

CRIME;

EID: 34249292421     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-25952-7_27     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Baker, W.E. & R.R. Faulkner (1993). The social organization of conspiracy: Illegal networks in the heavy electrical equipment industry. American Sociological Review, 58(12), 837-860.
2. Braam, R.R., H.F. Moed, & A.F.J. van Raan (1991). Mapping of science by combined co-citation and word analysis ii: Dynamical aspects. Journal of American Society of Information Science, 42(4), 252-266.
3. Burkhardt, M.E. & D.J. Brass (1990). Changing patterns or patterns of change: The effects of a change in technology on social network structure and power. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 104-127.
4. Carley, K.M., et al. (2003). Destabilizing dynamic covert networks. In Proceedings of the 8th International Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium. Washington DC., VA.
5. Carley, K.M., J. Lee, & D. Krackhardt (2002). Destabilizing networks. Connections, 24(3), 79-92.
6. Chen, C. & L. Carr (1999). Trailblazing the literature of hypertext: Author co-citation analysis (1989-1998). In Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia.
7. Chen, C. & L. Carr (1999). Visualizing the evolution of a subject domain: A case study. In Proceedings of IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization (INFOVIS '99).
8. Chen, C., et al. (2002). Visualizing and tracking the growth of competing paradigms: Two case studies. Journal of American Society of Information Science and Technology, 55(8), 678-689.
9. Chen, C., J. Kuljis, & R.J. Raul (2001). Visualizing latent domain knowledge. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part C: Applications and Reviews, 31(4), 518-529.
10. Chen, C. & R.J. Paul (2001). Visualizing a knowledge domain's intellectual structure. IEEE Computer, 34(3), 65-71.
11. Chen, C., R.J. Paul, & B. O'Keefe (2001). Fitting the jigsaw of citation: Information visualization in domain analysis. Journal of American Society of Information Science and Technology, 52(4), 315-330.
12. Culnan, M.J. (1986). The intellectual development of management information systems, 1972-1982: A co-citation analysis. Management Science, 32(2), 156-172.
13. Dombroski, M.J. & K.M. Carley (2002). Netest: Estimating a terrorist network's structure. Computational &. Mathematical Organization Theory, 8, 235-241.
14. Doreian, P., et al. (1997). A brief history of balance through time, in Evolution of social networks, P. Doreian & F.N. Stokman (eds.). Gordon and Breach: Australia. 129-147.
15. Doreian, P. & F.N. Stokman (1997). The dynamics and evolution of social networks, in Evolution of social networks, P. Doreian & F.N. Stokman (eds.). Gordon and Breach: Australia. 1-17.
16. Fennema, M. & H. Schijf (1978/79). Analyzing interlocking directories: Theory and methods. Social Networks, 1, 297-332.
17. Freeman, L.C. (1979). Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1, 215-240.
18. Fruchterman, T.M.J. & E.M. Reingold (1991). Graph drawing by force-directed placement Software - Practice & Experience, 21(11), 1129-1164.
19. Hallinan, M.T. (1978/79). The process of friendship formation. Social Networks, 1, 193-210.
20. Hummon, N.P. (2000). Utility and dynamic social networks. Social Networks, 22, 221-249.
21. Kamada, T. & S. Kawai (1989). An algorithm for drawing general undirected graphs. Information Processing Letters, 31(1), 7-15.
22. Klerks, P. (2001). The network paradigm applied to criminal organizations: Theoretical nitpicking or a relevant doctrine for investigators? Recent developments in the netherlands. Connections, 24(3), 53-65.
23. Krebs, V.E. (2001). Mapping networks of terrorist cells. Connections, 24(3), 43-52.
24. Lee, R.C.T., J.R. Slagle, & H. Blum (1977). A triangulation method for the sequential mapping of points from n-space to two-space. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 26, 288-292.
25. Leenders, R. (1997). Evolution of friendship and best friendship choices, in Evolution of social networks, P. Doreian & F.N. Stokman (eds.). Gordon and Breach: Australia.
26. McAndrew, D. (1999). The structural analysis of criminal networks, in The social psychology of crime: Groups, teams, and networks, offender profiling series, iii, D. Canter & L. Alison (eds.). Aldershot: Dartmouth.
27. Nakao, K. & A.K. Romney (1993). Longitudinal approach to subgroup formation: Reanalysis of newcomb's fraternity data Social Networks, 15, 109-131.
28. Newcomb, T.M. (1961). The acquaintance process, ed. Series. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
29. Noyons, E.C.M. & A.F.J.v. Raan (1998). Monitoring scientific developments from a dynamic perspective: Self-organized structuring to map neural network research. Journal of American Society of Information Science, 49(1), 68-81.
30. Ornstein, M.D. (1982). Interlocking directorates in canada: Evidence from replacement patterns. Social Networks, 4, 3-25.
31. Small, H. (1999). Visualizing science by citation mapping. Journal of American Society of Information Science, 50(9), 799-813.
32. Small, H.G. (1977). A co-citation model of a scientific specialty: A longitudinal study of collagen research. Social Studies of Science, 7, 139-166.
33. Snijders, T.A.B. (1997). Stochastic actor-oriented models for network change, in Evolution of social networks, P. Doreian & F.N. Stokman (eds.). Gordon and Breach: Australia.
34. Snijders, T.A.B. (2001). The statistical evaluation of social network dynamics. Sociological Methodology, 31, 361-395.
35. Sparrow, M.K. (1991). The application of network analysis to criminal intelligence: An assessment of the prospects. Social Networks, 13, 251-274.
36. Sullivan, D., D.H. White, & E.J. Barboni (1997). Co-citation analyses of science: An evaluation. Social Studies of Science, 7, 223-240.
37. van den Besselaar, P. & L. Leydesdorff (1996). Mapping change in scientific specialties: A scientometric reconstruction of the development of artificial intelligence. Journal of American Society of Information Science, 47(6), 415-436.
38. Wasserman, S. & K. Faust (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications, ed. Series. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39. Wellman, B. (1988). Structural analysis: From method and metaphor to theory and substance, in Social structures: A network approach, B. Wellman & S.D. Berkowitz (eds.). Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
40. White, H.D. & K.W. McCain (1998). Visualizing a discipline: An author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972-1995. Journal of American Society of Information Science and Technology, 49(4), 327-355.
41. Xu, J. & H. Chen (2003). Untangling criminal networks: A case study. In Proceedings of NSF/NIJ Symposium on Intelligence and Security Informatics (ISI'03). Tucson, AZ.
42. Xu, J. & H. Chen (Forthcoming). Fighting organized crime: Using shortest-path algorithms to identify associations in criminal networks. Decision Support Systems.