Importance of good nonlinear analysis

Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings

Volumn 15, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 515-531

  Krawinkler, Helmut ^a  

^a Stanford University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COLLAPSE PREVENTION LEVELS; GROUND MOTION; QUANTITATIVE EVALUATION;

BUILDING CODES; SAFETY FACTOR; STRUCTURES (BUILT OBJECTS); UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

NONLINEAR ANALYSIS;

EID: 34249286213     PISSN: 15417794     EISSN: 15417808     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/tal.379     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Aydinoglu MN. 2003. An incremental response spectrum analysis procedure based on inelastic spectral deformation for multi-mode seismic performance evaluation. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 1: 3-36.
2. Chopra AK, Goel RK. 2002. A modal pushover analysis procedure for estimating seismic demands for buildings. Journal of Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 31: 561-582.
3. Fajfar P. 2002. Structural analysis in earthquake engineering: a breakthrough of simplified non-linear methods. In Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, London, Paper Reference 843.
4. Gupta A, Krawinkler H. 1999. Seismic demands for performance evaluation of steel moment resisting frame structures. John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center Report No. 132, Department of Civil Engineering, Stanford University.
5. Gupta B, Kunnath SK. 2000. Adaptive spectra-based pushover procedure for seismic evaluation of structures. Earthquake Spectra 16(2): 367-391.
6. Ibarra LF, Krawinkler H. 2005. Global collapse of frame structures under seismic excitations. John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center Report No. TR 152, Department of Civil Engineering, Stanford University, and PEER Report 2005/06.
7. Krawinkler H, Seneviratna P. 1998. Pros and cons of a pushover analysis for seismic performance evaluation. Journal of Engineering Structures 20 (4-6): 452-464.
8. Medina R, Krawinkler H. 2003. Seismic demands for nondeteriorating frame structures and their dependence on ground motions. John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center Report No. TR 144, Department of Civil Engineering, Stanford University, 2003, and PEER Report 2003/15.
9. Uang CM, Yu QS, Gilton CS. 2000. Effects of loading history on cyclic performance of steel RBS moment connections. In Proceedings of the 12th WCEE, New Zealand, 2000, paper No. 1294.
10. Zareian F, Krawinkler H, Ibarra L. 2006. Why and how to predict the probability of collapse of buildings. In Proceedings of the 8NCEE, San Francisco, CA.