Evaluation of the relationship between subjects' perception and professional assessment of esthetic treatment needs

Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 154-162

  Tortopidis, Dimitrios ^a   Hatzikyriakos, Andreas ^a,c   Kokoti, Maria ^a   Menexes, George ^b   Tsiggos, Nikolaos ^a  

^a ARISTOTLE UNIVERSITY OF THESSALONIKI   (Greece)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MACEDONIA   (Greece)

^c NONE   (Greece)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BODY IMAGE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTIST; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; ESTHETICS; FEMALE; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; ODONTOMETRY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; SELF EVALUATION; SELF EXAMINATION; TOOTH; VALIDATION STUDY;

ADULT; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; BEAUTY; BODY IMAGE; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIST-PATIENT RELATIONS; DENTISTS; ESTHETICS, DENTAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; ODONTOMETRY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUESTIONNAIRES; SELF ASSESSMENT (PSYCHOLOGY); SELF-EXAMINATION; TOOTH;

EID: 34249109058     PISSN: 14964155     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2007.00089.x     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Goldstein RE. Study of need for esthetics in dentistry. J Prosthet Dent 1969 21 : 589 98.
2. Goldstein RE, Lancaster JS. Survey of patient attitudes toward current esthetic procedures. J Prosthet Dent 1984 52 : 775 80.
3. Graber LW, Lucker GW. Dental esthetic self-evaluation and satisfaction. Am J Orthod 1980 77 : 163 73.
4. Jenny J, Cons N. Comparing and contrasting two orthodontic indices, the index of orthodontic treatment need and the dental aesthetic index. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1996 110 : 410 6.
5. Brisman AS. Esthetics: a comparison of dentist's and patients' concepts. JADA 1980 100 : 345 52.
6. Carlsson GE, Wagner I-V, Odman P, et al. An international comparative multicenter study of assessment of dental appearance using computer-aided image manipulation. Int J Prosthodont 1998 18 : 246 54.
7. Wagner I-V, Carlsson GE, Ekstrand K, et al. A comparative study of assessment of dental appearance by dentists, dental technicians, and laymen using computer-aided image manipulation. J Esthet Dent 1996 8 : 199 205.
8. Hunt O, Hepper P, Johnston C, et al. The aesthetic component of the index of orthodontic treatment need validated against lay opinion. Eur J Orthod 2002 24 : 53 9.
9. Cons N, Jenny J, Kohout F, et al. Utility of the dental aesthetic index in industrialized and developing countries. J Public Health Dent 1989 49 : 163 6.
10. Davis L, Ashworth P, Spriggs L. Psychological effects of aesthetic dental treatment. J Dent 1998 26 : 547 54.
11. Yeh M, Koochek A, Vlaskalic V, et al. The relationship of 2 professional occlusal indexes with patients' perceptions of aesthetics, function, speech and orthodontic treatment need. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000 118 : 421 8.
12. Crzywacz I. The value of the aesthetic component of the index of orthodontic treatment need in the assessment of subjective orthodontic treatment need. Eur J Orthod 2003 25 : 57 63.
13. Brook P, Shaw W. The development of an index of orthodontic treatment priority. Eur J Orthod 1989 11 : 309 20.
14. Abe Y, Haebara T, Hanada K. An index for objective evaluation of the soft tissue profile. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 1990 5 : 249 54.
15. Richmond S, Shaw W, Roberts C, Andrews M. The PAR index (Peer Assessment Rating): methods to determine outcome of orthodontic treatment in terms of improvement and standards. Eur J Orthod 1992 14 : 180 7.
16. Kokich V, Kiyak A, Shapiro P. Comparing the perception of dentists and lay people to altered dental esthetics. J Esthet Dent 1999 11 : 311 24.
17. Sarver D. The importance of incisor positioning in the esthetic smile: the smile arc. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001 120 : 98 111.
18. Dunn W, Murchison D, Broome J. Esthetics : patients' perceptions of dental attractiveness. J Prosthodont 1996 5 : 166 71.
19. Miller E, Bodden R, Jamison H. A study of the relationship of the dental midline to the facial median line. J Prosthet Dent 1979 41 : 657 60.
20. Preston J. The golden proportion revisited. J Esthet Dent 1993 5 : 247 51.
21. Reddy M. Achieving gingival esthetics. JADA 2003 134 : 295 304.
22. Carmines EG, Zeller RA. Reliability and validity assessment. Newbury Park (CA) : Sage Publications Inc 1979.
23. Bryant F. Assessing the validity of measurement. In : Grimm L, Yarnold P, editors. Reading and understanding more multivariate statistics. Washington : American Psychological Association 2000. p. 99 146.
24. Clausen SE. Applied correspondence analysis: an introduction. Sage University Papers on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences (Series Number 07-121). Thousand Oakes (CA): Sage 1998.
25. Strub M. Reliability and generalizability theory. In : Grimm L, Yarnold P, editors. Reading and understanding more multivariate statistics. Washington : American Psychological Association 2000. p. 23 66.
26. Gifi A. Non-linear multivariate analysis. New York : John Wiley, Inc 1990.
27. Malhorta NK. Marketing research. An applied orientation. Englewood Cliffs (NJ) : Prentice Hall 1996.
28. Klages U, Claus N, Wehrbein H, Zentner A. Development of a questionnaire for assessment of the psychosocial impact of dental aesthetics in young adults. Eur J Orthod 2005 28 : 1 9.
29. Linder-Aronson S. Orthodontics in the Swedish public dental health system. Trans Eur Orthod Soc 1974 : 233 40.
30. Flores-Mir C, Silva E, Barriga MI, et al. Lay persons' perception of smile aesthetics in dental and facial views. J Orthod 2004 31 : 204 9.
31. Miller TT. Orthodontic therapy for the restorative patient. Part II: the esthetic aspect. J Prosthet Dent 1989 61 : 402 11.
32. Flores Mir C, Silva E, Barriga MI, et al. Perceptions of the esthetics of visible anterior occlusion. J Can Dent Assoc 2005 71 : 849 849d.