Effect of extended storage on microbiological quality, somatic cell count, and composition of raw goat milk on a farm

Journal of Food Protection

Volumn 70, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 1281-1285

  Zeng, S S ^a   Chen, S S ^a,b   Bah, B ^a   Tesfai, K ^a  

^a LANGSTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CHINA AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); CAPRA HIRCUS;

EID: 34249103870     PISSN: 0362028X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4315/0362-028X-70.5.1281     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Agnihotri, M. K., and V. S. S. Prasad. 1993. Biochemistry and processing of goat milk and milk products. Small Rumin. Res. 12:151-170.
2. Barbano, D. M., Y. Ma, and M. V. Santost. 2006. Influence of raw milk quality on fluid milk shelf life. J. Dairy Sci. 89:E15-E19.
3. Boor, K. J. 2001. Fluid dairy product quality and safety: looking to the future. J. Dairy Sci. 84:1-11.
4. Boor, K. J., D. P. Brown, S. C. Murphy, S. M. Kozlowski, and D. K. Bandler. 1998. Microbiological and chemical quality of raw milk in New York State. J. Dairy Sci. 81:1743-1748.
5. Deeth, H. C., C. H. Fitz-Gerald, and A. F. Snow. 1983. A gas chromatographic method for the quantitative determination of free fatty acids in milk and milk products. N.Z. J. Dairy Sci. Technol. 18:13-20.
6. Dubeuf, J. P., P. Morand-Fehr, and R. Rubino. 2004. Situation, changes and future of goat industry around the world. Small Rumin. Res. 51:165-173.
7. Haenlein, G.. F. W. 2001. Past, present, and future perspectives of small ruminant dairy research. J. Dairy Sci. 84:2097-2115.
8. Hayes, M. C., R. D. Ralyea, R. C. Murphy, N. R. Carey, J. M. Scarlett, and K. J. Boor. 2001. Identification and characterization of elevated microbial counts in bulk tank raw milk. J. Dairy Sci. 84: 292-298.
9. Houghtby, G. A., L. J. Maturin, and E. K. Koenig. 1992. Microbiological count methods, p. 213-246. In R. T. Marshall (ed.), Standard methods for the examination of dairy products. American Public Health Association, Washington, D.C.
10. Ma, Y., C. Ryan, D. M. Barbano, D. M. Galton, M. Rudan, and K. Boor. 2000. Effects of somatic cell count on quality and shelf-life of pasteurized fluid milk. J. Dairy Sci. 83:264-274.
11. Rogers, S. A., and G.. E. Mitchell. 1989. The relationship between somatic cell count, composition and manufacturing properties of bulk milk. 5. Pasteurized milk and skim milk powdered. Aust. J. Dairy Technol. 44:57-60.
12. SAS. 1990. SAS user's guide: statistics. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, N.C.
13. Singh, S. N., and O. P. S. Sengar. 1990. Studies on the combining ability of desirable characters of important goat breeds, p. 217-267. Final technical report PL-480. RBS College, Bichpuri, Agra, India.
14. Taylor, V. (Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food, Canada). Personal communication.
15. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Public Health Service, Department of Health and Human Services. 2005. Grade "A" pasteurized milk ordinance. Washington, D.C. Available at: http:// www.foodscience.cornell.edu/cals/ foodsci/extension/upload/ PMO_2005.pdf. Accessed 15 February 2007.
16. Zeng, S. S., E. N. Escobar, and T. Popham. 1997. Daily variations in somatic cell count, composition, and production of Alpine goat milk. Small Rumin. Res. 26:253-260.
17. Zeng, S. S., T. Popham, and E. N. Escobar. 1999. Seasonal variation of somatic cell count and chemical composition in bulk tank goat milk. Dairy Food Environ. Sanit. 19:685-690.