Green neoliberal space: The Mesoamerican Biological Corridor

Journal of Latin American Geography

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 101-124

  Finley Brook, Mary ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND   (United States)

Author keywords

Central America; Environment; Green neoliberalism; Nicaragua; Uneven development

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; NEOLIBERALISM; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; UNEVEN DEVELOPMENT;

CENTRAL AMERICA; NICARAGUA;

EID: 34249058071     PISSN: 15452476     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1353/lag.2007.0000     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Allen, J. 2003. Lost Geographies of Power. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
2. Allen, J. 2004. The Whereabouts of Power: Politics, Government and Space. Geografiska Annaler 86 B: 19-32.
3. Altamirano-Jiménez, I. 2004. North American First Peoples: Slipping up into Market Citizenship. Citizensbip Studes 8(4): 349-365.
4. Ankersen, T. T., K. E. Regan, S. A. Mack. 2006. Towards a bioregional approach to tropical forest conservation: Costa Rica's Greater Osa Bioregion. Futures 38: 406-431.
5. Autoridad Nacional del Ambiente-Corredor Biológico Mesoamericano del Atlántico Panameño (ANAM-CBMAP). 2001. Subproyectos Aprobados y en Ejecución al 30 de Noviembre de 2001. http://www.cbmap.org/cbmap_subproyectos.php. Accessed on 5 May 2005.
6. Bennett, A. F. 2003. Linkages in the Landscape: The Role of Corridors and Connectivity in Wildlife Conservation. Cambridge: The World Conservation Union (IUCN).
7. Brook, M. M. 2005. Re-scaling the Commons: Miskitu Indians, Forest Commodities, and Transnational Development Networks. Unpublished Ph. D. dissertation, Department of Geography and the Environment, University of Texas at Austin.
8. Brosius, J. P. and D. Russell. 2003. Conservation from Above: An Anthropological Perspective on Transboundary Protected Areas and Ecoregional Planning. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 17(1/2): 39-65.
9. Call, W. 2003. Mexicans and Central Americans "can't take any more." NACLA 36(5): 9-13.
10. Carr III, A. 2004. What are Central America's parks for?, Wild Earth Spring/Summer: 34-39.
11. CBA. 2003. Planes de Desarrollo Comunitario, Componente de Planificación y Monitoreo, Proyecto Corredor Biológico del Atlántico (CBA).
12. CBA. 2003. n. d. Lista de Subproyectos Financiado por el Corredor Biológico del Atlántico (CBA) http://www.cbanic.org. Accessed 1 May, 2005.
13. CCAD-RUTA. 2000. Inventario de Proyectos Ambientales de Centroamérica: Informe Nacional Nicaragua, Versión Ejecutiva, Unidad Regional de Asistencia Técnica (RUTA), Comisión Centroamericana de Ambiente y Desarrollo, (CCAD).
14. CCAD-WB. 2002. Nature, people, and well-being: Coordinating sustainable development in Mesoamerica, Business plan (2003-2007). Conferencia de Socios y Donantes CBM, Paris. Comisión Centroamericana de Ambiente y Desarrollo (CCAD)-World Bank.
15. Chapin, M. 2004. A Challenge to Conservationists. World Watch, November/December: 17-31.
16. Craddock, B. J. 2006. Keynote Speaker at FIU/AWS/Southcorn Conference entitled "The Americas in the 21st Century: The Challenge of Governance and Security." Transcript of the speech available at http:// www.southcom.mil/PA/CMDR/Speeches/, accessed 5 May 2006.
17. Elizondo, C. 2002. El Corredor Biológico Mesoamericano, un proyecto internacional de desarrollo sostenible. Tesis de maestría. El Colegio de la Frontera Sur, México.
18. Escobar, A. 1995. Encountering Development: The Making and Unmaking of the Third World. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
19. Foucault, M. 1977. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. London: Penguin Books. Franco, P. 2003. Central America's Nature Reserves Imperiled. Tierramerica. https://global.factiva.com. Accessed 29 May 2005.
20. GEF 1997. Nicaragua: Atlantic Biological Corridor Project. Washington, D.C.: Global Environmental Facility/World Bank.
21. Goldman, M. 2004. Imperial Science, Imperial Nature: Environmental Knowledge for the World (Bank). In Earthly Politics: Local and Global in Environmental Governance. S. Jasanoff and M. L. Martello (eds.) pp. 55-80. Cambridge: MIT Press.
22. Goldman, M. 2005. Imperial Nature: The World Bank and Struggles for Social Justice in the Age of Globalization. New Haven: Yale.
23. Gordon, E. T., G. C. Gurdián, C. R. Hale. 2003. Rights, Resources, and the Social Memory of Struggle: Reflections on a Study of Indigenous and Black Community Land Rights on Nicaragua's Atlantic Coast. Human Organization 62(4): 369-381.
24. Hartmann, B. 2004. Conserving Racism: The Greening of Hate at Home and Abroad. Different Takes 27: 1-4.
25. Harvey, N. 2001. Globalisation and resistance in post-cold war Mexico: difference, citizenship and biodiversity conflicts in Chiapas. Third World Quarterly 22(6): 1045-1061.
26. Kaiser, J. 2001. Bold Corridor Project Confronts Political Reality. Science 293(5538): 2196-2199.
27. Katz, C. 2001. Vagabond Capitalism and the Necessity of Social Reproduction. Antipode 33(4): 709-728.
28. Lopez, B. V. 2005. Piracy in disguise. Business World. https:// global.factiva.com. Accessed 29 May 2005.
29. MacLeod, H. 2004. Taking control in Chiapas. New Internationalist 374: 16-17.
30. MBC. 2002. The Mesoamerican Biological Corridor: A Platform for Sustainable Development. Managua, Comisión Centroamericana de Ambiente y Desarrollo (CCAD)- United Nations Development Program/Global Environmental Facility.
31. McCarthy, J. and S. Prudham. 2004. Neoliberal nature and the nature of neoliberalism. Geoforum 35: 275-283.
32. Mendoza, V., R. 2002. The New Ecology: Exploiting Forests to Preserve Them. Envio 21(253): 38-46.
33. Miller, K., E. Chang, and N. Johnson. 2001. Defining Common Ground for the Mesoamerican Biological Corridor. Washington, D.C.: World Resources Institute.
34. Miller, K. R. 1996. Balancing the Scales: Guidelines for Increasing Biodiversity's Chances through Bioregional Management. New York: World Resources Institute.
35. Mine, G., D. Rodriguez, S. Sakai, R. Quiroga, L. Taber and A. Rodríguez. 2001. The Mesoamerican Biological Corridor as a Vector for Sustainable Development in the Region: The Role of International Financing, Preliminary Considerations. Washington: Inter-American Development Bank and World Bank.
36. Mitchell, M. 1996. From Talking Chiefs to a Native Corporate Elite: The Birth of Class and Nationalism among Canadian Inuit. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.
37. Navarro, R. and E. Rasmussen. 2005. Cynical Trade. http:// centralamerica.ms.dk/articles/English/cynicaltrade.htm. Accessed 13 July 2005.
38. Newcomer, Q. 2002. Path of the Tapir: Integrating Biological Corridors, Ecosystem Management, and Socioeconomic Development in Costa Rica. Endangered Species Update 19(4):186-193.
39. Nietschmann, B. Q. 1997. Protecting Indigenous Coral Reefs and Sea Territories, Miskito Coast, RAAN, Nicaragua. In Conservation Through Cultural Survival: Indigenous Peoples and Protected Areas. S. Stevens (ed.) pp. 193-224. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.
40. NotiCen: Central American and Caribbean Affairs. 2003. "Plan Puebla-Panama fading, even as some projects advance." Latin America Data Base, University of New Mexico, http://ladb.urm.edu. Accessed 5 May 2005.
41. NotiCen: Central American and Caribbean Affairs. 2005. Honduras High Tech Land Solution Shows Low Regard for Garifunas. Latin America Data Base, University of New Mexico, http://ladb.unm.edu. Accessed 5 May 2005.
42. Perreault, T. and P. Martin. 2005. Geographies of neoliberalism in Latin America. Environment and Planning A, 37: 191-201.
43. Ribot, J. C. 2004. Waiting for Democracy: The Politics of Choice in Natural Resource Decentralization. Washington, D. C.: World Resources Institute.
44. Rossiter, D. and P. K. Wood. 2005. Fantastic topographies: neo-liberal responses to Aboriginal land claims in British Columbia. The Canadian Geographer 49(4): 352-366.
45. Sánchez, E. 2003. Escaparate verde para vender aire y oxígeno. El Nuevo Diario, http://archivo.elnuevodiario. com.ni, accessed 6 May 2006.
46. Stocks, A. 2003. Mapping Dreams in Nicaragua's Bosawas Reserve. Human Organization 62(4): 344-356.
47. Style, S. 2001. Down Mexico Way. The Ecologist 31(5): 50-52.
48. Sundberg, J. 2003. Strategies for Authenticity and Space in the Maya Biosphere Reserve,
49. Petén, Guatemala. In Political Ecology: An Integrative Approach to Geography and Environment-Development Studies. K. S. Zimmerer and T. J. Bassett (eds.) pp. 50-69. New York: Guilford.
50. Taylor, P. J. and F. H. Buttel. 1992. How do we know we have Global Environmental Problems? Science and the Globalization of Environmental Discourse. Geoforum 23(3): 405-416.
51. Toly, N. J. 2004. Globalization and the Capitalization of Nature: A Political Ecology of Biodiversity in Mesoamerica. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 24(1): 47-54.
52. World Rainforest Movement (WRM). 2003. Corredor Biológico Mesoamericano: ¿conservación o apropiación? ProDiversitas, Panama, http://www.prodiversitas.bioetica.org/ panama.htm, accessed 29 May 2005.
53. World Resources Institute (WRI), United Nations Environment Program (UNEP), United Nations Development Program (UNDP), and World Bank. 2003. Proposed Elements of the Mesoamerican Biological Corridor, accessed 1 May 2006 at http://earthtrends.wri.org/text/environmental-governance/ map-478.html
54. Zimmerer, K. S., R. E. Galt, and M. V. Buck. 2004. Globalization and Multi-spatial Trends in the Coverage of Protected-Area Conservation (1980-2000). Ambio 33(8): 520-529.