Comparison of different ridge formation models of Arctic sea ice with observations from laser profiling

Annals of Glaciology

Volumn 44, Issue , 2006, Pages 403-410

  Martin, Torge ^a  

^a ALFRED WEGENER INSTITUTE FOR POLAR AND MARINE RESEARCH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLIMATE MODELING; DENSITY; HEIGHT; ICE MECHANICS; ICE MOVEMENT; ICE THICKNESS; SEA ICE; SURFACE ROUGHNESS; THERMODYNAMICS;

ARCTIC OCEAN;

EID: 34249053811     PISSN: 02603055     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3189/172756406781811132     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Dierking, W. 1995. Laser profiling of the ice surface topography during the Winter Weddell Gyre Study 1992. J. Geophys. Res., 100(C3), 4807-4820.
2. Flato, G.M. and W.D. Hibler, III. 1991. An initial numerical investigation of the extent of sea-ice ridging. Ann. Glaciol., 15, 31-36.
3. Flato, G.M. and W.D. Hibler, III. 1995. Ridging and strength in modeling the thickness distribution of Arctic sea ice. J. Geophys. Res., 100(C9), 18,611-18,626.
4. Gray, J.M.N.T. and L.W. Morland. 1994. A two-dimensional model for the dynamics of sea ice. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. A, 347(1682), 219-290.
5. Haapala, J., N. Lönnroth and A. Stössel. 2005. A numerical study of open water formation in sea ice. J. Geophys. Res., 110(C9), C09011. (10.1029/2003JC002200.)
6. Harder, M. 1996. Dynamik, Rauhigkeit und Alter des Meereis in der Arktis - numerische Untersuchungen mit einem grossskaligen Modell. Ber. Polarforsch. 203.
7. Harder, M. and P. Lemke. 1994. Modelling the extent of sea ice ridging in the Weddell Sea. In Johannessen, O.M., R.D. Muench and J.E. Overland, eds. The polar oceans and their role in shaping the global environment: the Nansen Centennial volume. Washington, DC, American Geophysical Union, 187-197. (Geophysical Monograph 85.)
8. Hibler, W.D., III. 1979. A dynamic thermodynamic sea ice model. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 9(7), 815-846.
9. Hilmer, M. and P. Lemke. 2000. On the decrease of Arctic sea ice volume. Geophys. Res. Lett., 27(22), 3751-3754.
10. Kreyscher, M., M. Harder, P. Lemke and G.M. Flato. 2000. Results of the Sea Ice Model Intercomparison Project: evaluation of sea ice rheology schemes for use in climate simulations. J. Geophys. Res., 105(C5), 11,299-11,320.
11. Lensu, M. 2003. The evolution of ridged ice fields. (PhD thesis, Helsinki University of Technology.)
12. Lieser, J.L. and P. Lemke. 2002. A sea ice forecasting model for the Arctic Ocean. In Squire, V.A. and P.J. Langhorne, eds. Ice in the Environment: Proceedings of the 16th IAHR Conference on Sea Ice Processes, 2-6 December 2002, Dunedin, New Zealand, Vol. 2. Dunedin, International Association of Hydraulic Engineering and Research, 439-444.
13. Maykut, G.A. and N. Untersteiner. 1971. Some results from a time-dependent thermodynamic model of sea ice. J. Geophys. Res., 76(6), 1550-1575.
14. Mock, S.J., A.D. Hartwell and W.D. Hibler, III. 1972. Spatial aspects of pressure ridge statistics. J. Geophys. Res., 77(30), 5945-5953.
15. Parkinson, C.L. and W.M. Washington. 1979. A large-scale numerical model of sea ice. J. Geophys. Res., 84(C1), 311-337.
16. Schulkes, R.M.S.M. 1995. A note on the evolution equations for the area fraction and the thickness of a floating ice cover. J. Geophys. Res., 100(C3), 5021-5024.
17. Shinohara, Y. 1990. A redistribution function applicable to a dynamic sea ice model. J. Geophys. Res., 95(C8), 13,423-13,431.
18. Steiner, N., M. Harder and P. Lemke. 1999. Sea ice roughness and drag coefficients in a dynamic-thermodynamic sea ice model for the Arctic. Tellus, 51A(5), 964-978.
19. Thorndike, A.S., D.A. Rothrock, G.A. Maykut and R. Colony. 1975. The thickness distribution of sea ice. J. Geophys. Res., 80(33), 4501-4513.
20. Timco, G.W. and R.P. Burden. 1997. An analysis of the shapes of sea ice ridges. Cold Reg. Sci. Technol., 25(1), 65-77.