Gross motor development of Asian and European children on four motor assessments: A literature review

Pediatric Physical Therapy

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 148-153

  Mayson, Tanja Anick ^a   Harris, Susan R ^b   Bachman, Catherine L ^b  

^a BC CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Asia ethnology; Child; Child development; Europe ethnology; Infant; Literature review; Motor skills

Indexed keywords

ASIAN; CHILD; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; CINAHL; EMBASE; ETHNICITY; ETHNOLOGY; EUROPEAN AMERICAN; HUMAN; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MEDLINE; MOTOR DEVELOPMENT; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; PSYCINFO; REVIEW; SCREENING TEST;

ASIAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; CHILD; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; EUROPEAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; HUMANS; INFANT; MOTOR SKILLS; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; PHYSICAL THERAPY MODALITIES;

EID: 34249037150     PISSN: 08985669     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/PEP.0b013e31804a57c1     Document Type: Review

References (47)

1. Sharkey MA, Palitz ME, Reece LF, et al. The effect of early referral and intervention on the developmentally disabled infant: Evaluation at 18 months of age. J Am Board Fam Pract. 1990;3:163-170.
2. Thomaidis L, Kaderoglou E, Stefou M, Damianou S, Bakoula C. Does early intervention work? A controlled trial. Infants Young Children. 2000;12:17-22.
3. Palmer FB, Shapiro BK, Wachtel RC, et al. The effects of physical therapy on cerebral palsy: A controlled trial in infants with spastic diplegia. N Engl J Med. 1988;318:803-808.
4. Piper MC, Kunos VI, Willis DM, et al. Early physical therapy effects on the high-risk infant: A randomized controlled trial. Pediatrics. 1986;78:216-224.
5. Ramey CT, Ramey SL. Which children benefit the most from early intervention? Pediatrics. 1994;94:1064-1066.
6. Edwards SL, Sarwark JF. Infant and child motor development. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;434:33-39.
7. Chandler LS, Andrews MS, Swanson MW. Movement Assessment of Infants: A Manual. Rolling Bay, WA: Chandler, Andrews, and Swanson; 1980.
8. Piper MC, Darrah J. Motor Assessment of the Developing Infant. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1994.
9. Frankenburg WK, Dodds J, Archer P, et al. The Denver II: A major revision and restandardization of the Denver Developmental Screening Test. Pediatrics. 1992;89:91-97.
10. Bayley N. Bayley Scales of Infant Development. 2nd ed. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation; 1993.
11. Henderson SE, Sugden DA. Movement Assessment Battery for Children. Kent, UK: Psychological Corporation; 1992.
12. Harris SR, Megens AM, Backman CL, et al. Development and standardization of the Harris Infant Neuromotor Test. Infants and Young Children. 2003;16:143-151.
13. Cintas HL. Cross-cultural similarities and differences in development and the impact of parental expectations on motor behavior. Pediatr Phys Ther. 1995;7:103-111.
14. Ivanans T. Effect of maternal education and ethnic background on infant development. Arch Dis Child. 1975;50:454-457.
15. Crowe TK, McClain C, Provost B. Motor development of Native American children on the Peabody Developmental Motor Scales. Am J Occup Ther. 1999;53:514-518.
16. McClain C, Provost B, Crowe TK. Motor development of two-year-old typically developing Native American Children on the Bayley Scales of Infant Development-II Motor Scale. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2000;12:108-113.
17. Kerfeld CI, Guthrie MR, Stewart KB. Evaluation of the Denver II as applied to Alaskan Native children. Pediatr Phys Ther. 1997;9:23-31.
18. Cohen E, Boettcher K, Maher T, et al. Evaluation of the Peabody Gross Motor Scales for young children of African American and Hispanic ethnic backgrounds. Pediatr Phys Ther. 1999;11:191-197.
19. Stanitski DF, Nietert PJ, Stanitski CL, et al. Relationship of factors affecting age of onset of independent ambulation. J Pediatr Orthop. 2000;20:686-688.
20. Toy CC, Deitz J, Engel JM, et al. Performance of 6-month-old Asian American infants on the Movement Assessment of Infants: a descriptive study. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2000;19:5-23.
21. Statistics Canada. Population by Selected Ethnic Origins, by Provinces and Territories (2001 Census) (British Columbia). 2005. Available at: http://www40.statcan.ca/l01/cst01/demo26k.htm. Accessed February 28, 2007.
22. Frankenburg WK, Fandal JB, Dodds AW. Denver Developmental Screening Test Manual. Denver: University of Colorado Medical Centre; 1970.
23. Frankenburg WK, Dodds J, Archer P, et al. Denver II Screening Manual. Denver, CO: Developmental Materials Inc; 1990.
24. Ueda R. Standardization of the Denver Developmental Screening Test on Japanese children. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1978;20:647-656.
25. Ueda R. Characteristics of child development in Okinawa: Comparisons with Tokyo and Denver and implications for developmental screening. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1978;20:657-663.
26. Williams PD. The Metro-Manila Developmental Screening Test: A normative study. Nurs Res. 1984;33:208-212.
27. Williams PD, Williams AR. Denver Developmental Screening Test norms: A cross-cultural comparison. J Pediatr Psychol. 1987;12:39-59.
28. Miller V, Onotera RT, Deiner AS. Denver Developmental Screening Test: Cultural variations in South-East Asian Children. J Pediatr. 1984;104:481-482.
29. Chen ST. Comparison between the development of Malaysian and Denver children. J Singapore Paediatr Soc. 1989;31:178-185.
30. Jie S, Yue-Mei Z, Xing-Yuan G. Restandardization of the Denver Developmental Screening Test for Shanghai children. Chinese Med J. 1982;95:375-380.
31. The Collaborative Study Group of Child Developmental Tests. Restandardization of DDST from six cities in north China. Chinese Med J. 1986;99:166-172.
32. Sriyaporn PP, Pissasoontorn W, Sakdisawadi O. Denver Developmental Screening Test survey of Bangkok children. Asia Pac J Public Health. 1994;7:173-177.
33. Lim HC, Chan T, Yoong T. Standardization and adaptation of the Denver Developmental Screening Test (DDST) and Denver II for use in Singapore children. Singapore Medical J. 1994;35:156-160.
34. Washington K, Deitz JC. Performance of full-term 6-month-old-infants on the Movement Assessment of Infants. Pediatr Phys Ther. 1995;7:65-75.
35. Bayley N. Bayley Scales of Infant Development. New York, NY: Psychological Corporation; 1969.
36. Campbell SK, Siegel E, Parr CA, et al. Evidence for the need to renorm the Bayley Scales of Infant Development based on the performance of a population-based sample of 12-month-old infants. Top Early Childhood Special Ed. 1986;6:83-96.
37. Pomerleau A, Malcuit G, Chicoine JF, et al. Health status, cognitive and motor development of young children adopted from China, East Asia, and Russia across the first 6 months after adoption. Int J Behav Dev. 2005;29:445-457.
38. Miyahara M, Tsujuii M, Hanai T, et al. The Movement Assessment Battery for Children: a preliminary investigation of its usefulness in Japan. Hum Mov Sci. 1998;17:679-697.
39. Chow SMK, Henderson SE, Barnett AL. The Movement Assessment Battery for Children: A comparison of 4-year-old to 6-year-old children from Hong Kong and the United States. Am J Occup Ther. 2001;55:55-61.
40. Chow SMK, Hsu Y, Henderson SE, et al. The Movement ABC: a cross-cultural comparison of preschool children from Hong Kong, Taiwan, and the USA. Adapt Phys Activity Q. 2006;23:31-48.
41. Wright HC, Sugden DA, Ng R, et al. Identification of children with movement problems in Singapore: Usefulness of the Movement ABC checklist. Adapt Phys Activity Q. 1994;11:150-157. 41.
42. Nelson EAS, Yu LM, Wong HYE, et al. Rolling over in infants: Age, ethnicity, and cultural differences. DevMedChild Neurol. 2004;46:706-709.
43. Capute AJ, Shapiro BK, Palmer FB, et al. Normal gross motor development: The influences of race, gender, socio-economic status. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1985;27:635-643.
44. Canadian Institute of Child Health. The Health of Canada's Children: A CICH Profile. Children and Youth with Disabilities. (2000). Available at: http://www.cich.ca/PDFFiles/ProfileFactSheets/English/DisabilitiesEng.pdf. Accessed February 28, 2007.
45. Harris SR, Daniels LE. Content validity of the Harris Infant Neuromotor Test. Phys Ther. 2003;76:727-737.
46. Bennett FC. The effectiveness of early intervention for infants at increased biological risk. In: Guralnick MJ, Bennett FC, eds. The Effectiveness of Early Intervention for At-Risk and Handicapped Children. Orlando, FL: Academic Press Inc;1987: 79-112.
47. Preamble to the Constitution of the World Health Organization as adopted by the International Health Conference, New York, 19 -22 June, 1946; signed on 22 July 1946 by the representatives of 61 States (Official Records of the World Health Organization, no. 2, p. 100) and entered into force on 7 April 1948.