Motor development of native American children on the peabody developmental motor scales

American Journal of Occupational Therapy

Volumn 53, Issue 5, 1999, Pages 514-518

  Crowe, Terry K ^a   McClain, Catherine ^a   Provost, Beth ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b ExplorAbilities Pediat Ther Center   (United States)

Author keywords

Cultural characteristics (sociology); Motor skills evaluation

Indexed keywords

AMERICAN INDIAN; ARTICLE; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; CLASSIFICATION; CULTURAL FACTOR; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; PRESCHOOL CHILD; REFERENCE VALUE;

CHILD DEVELOPMENT; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; CULTURAL CHARACTERISTICS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INDIANS, NORTH AMERICAN; MALE; MOTOR SKILLS; REFERENCE VALUES;

EID: 0033192698     PISSN: 02729490     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5014/ajot.53.5.514     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Cintas, H. L. (1995). Cross-cultural similarities and differences in development and the impact of parental expectations on motor behavior. Pediatric Physical Therapy, 7, 103-111.
2. Connelly, J. (1983). Comparative analysis of two tests of visual-fine-motor integration among young Indian and non-Indian children. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 57, 1079-1082.
3. Folio, M. R., & Fewell, R. R. (1983). Peabody Developmental Motor Scales. Allen, TX: DLM Teaching Resources.
4. Frankenburg, W. K., Dodds, J. B., Archer, P., Bresnick, B., Maschka, P., Edelman, N., & Shapiro, H. (1990). Denver II screening manual. Denver, CO: Denver Developmental Materials.
5. Fuller, G., & Vance, H. B. (1995). A comparison of three Native American groups and a Caucasian group on the Minnesota PerceptoDiagnostic Test-Revised. Psychology in the Schools, 32(1), 12-17.
6. Green, K., Deitz, J., & Brady, K. D. (1995). Comparison of two scoring methods of the Peabody Gross Motor Scale. Physical and Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 14, 121-132.
7. Hinderer, K. A., Richardson, P. K., & Atwater, S. W. (1989). Clinical implications of the Peabody Developmental Motor Scales: A constructive review. Physical and Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 9, 81-106.
8. Kerfeld, C. I., Guthrie, M. R., & Stewart, K. B. (1997). Evaluation of the Denver II as applied to Alaska Native children. Pediatric Physical Therapy, 9, 23-31.
9. Krefting, L. (1991). The culture concept in the everyday practice of occupational and physical therapy. Physical and Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 11(4), 1-16.
10. Lynch, E., & Hanson, M. (1992). Steps in the right direction: Implications for interventionists. In E. Lynch & M. Hanson (Eds.), Developing cross cultural competence (pp. 491-512). Baltimore: Brookes.
11. Palisano, R. J. (1990). Commentary. Physical and Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 10(1), 1-3.
12. Palisano, R. (1993). Neuromotor and developmental assessment. In I. Wilhelm (Ed.), Physical therapy assessment in early infancy (pp. 173-224). New York: Churchill Livingstone.
13. Price, T. (1976). Sioux children's Koppitz scores on the Bender-Gestalt given by white or Native American examiners. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 43, 1223-1226.
14. Stratman, S. K. (1992). Gross motor skills in Navajo American Indian children one year or under. Studies in Human Ecology, 10, 115-120.
15. Taylor, H., & Thweatt, R. (1972). Cross-cultural developmental performance of Navajo children on die Bender-Gestalt test. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 35, 307-309.