Optimal three-level designs for response surfaces in spherical experimental regions

Journal of Quality Technology

Volumn 39, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 340-354

  Mee, Robert W ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

^b University of Tennessee's   (United States)

^c ASQ   (United States)

Author keywords

Box Behnken design; Computer experiment; D efficiency; I efficiency; Mixture design; Second order model; Split plot; V efficiency

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; OPTIMAL SYSTEMS; OPTIMIZATION; RANDOM PROCESSES;

BOX-BEHNKEN DESIGN; COMPUTER EXPERIMENTS; D-EFFICIENCY; I-EFFICIENCY; MIXTURE DESIGN; SECOND ORDER MODELS; SPLIT PLOT RANDOMIZATION; V-EFFICIENCY;

PROCESS DESIGN;

EID: 34249031055     PISSN: 00224065     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00224065.2007.11917700     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. ALBERT, I. and GAUCHI, J. P. (2002). "Sensitivity Analysis for High Quantiles of Ochratoxin A Exposure Distribution". International Journal of Food Microbiology 75, pp. 143-155.
2. ATKINSON, A. C. (1996). "The Usefulness of Optimum Experimental Designs". Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 58, pp. 59-76.
3. ATKINSON, A. C. and DONEV, A. N. (1992). Optimum Experimental Designs. Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK.
4. BISGAARD, S. (1997). "Why Three-Level Designs Are Not So Useful for Technological Applications". Quality Engineering 9, pp. 545-550.
5. BOX, G. E. P. and BEHNKEN, D. W. (1958). "Some New Three Level Second Order Designs for Surface Fitting". Statistical Techniques Research Group Technical Report No. 26. Princeton University.
6. BOX, G. E. P. and BEHNKEN, D. W. (1960). "Some New Three Level Designs for the Study of Quantitative Variables". Technometrics 2, pp. 455-475.
7. CARLYLE, W. M.; MONTGOMERY, D. C.; and RUNGER, G. C. (2000). "Optimization Problems and Methods in Quality Control and Improvement". Journal of Quality Technology 32, pp. 1-17.
8. CROSSIER, R. B. (1991). "Some New Three-Level Response Surface Designs". Technical Report CRDEC-TR-308, US Army Chemical Research, Development, and Engineering Center.
9. DRAPER, N. R.; DAVIS, T. P.; POZUETA, L.; and GROVE, D. M. (1994). "Isolation of Degrees of Freedom for Box-Behnken Designs". Technometrics 36, pp. 283-291.
10. DRAPER, N. R. and JOHN, J. A. (1988). "Response Surface Designs for Quantitative and Qualitative Variables". Technometrics 30, pp. 423-428.
11. DRAPER, N. R. and JOHN, J, A. (1998). "Response Surface Designs Where Levels of Some Factors Are Difficult to Change". Australian and New Zealand Journal of Statistics 40, pp. 487-495.
12. FARRELL, R. H.; KIEFER, J.; and WALBRAN, A. (1967). "Optimum Multivariate Designs". Proceedings of the 5th Berkeley Symposium 1, pp. 113-138.
13. GOOS, P. (2002). The Optimal Design of Blocked and Split-Plot Experiments. Springer, New York, NY.
14. GOOS, P. and VANDEBROEK, M. (2001). "Optimal Split Plot Designs". Journal of Quality Technology 33, pp. 436-450.
15. GOOS, P. and VANDEBROEK, M. (2003). "D-Optimal Split Plot Designs with Given Numbers of Sizes and Whole Plots". Technometrics 45, pp. 235-245.
16. GOOS, P. and VANDEBROEK, M. (2004). "Outperforming Completely Randomized Designs". Journal of Quality Technology 36, pp. 12-26.
17. HARDIN, R. H. and SLOANE, N. J. A. (1993). "A New Approach to Construction of Optimal Designs". Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 37, pp. 339-369. (Updated version of this paper appears at http://www.research.att.com/~njas/doc/de.html.)
18. HARDIN, R. H. and SLOANE, N. J. A. (2001). "Computer-Generated Minimal (and Larger) Response-Surface Designs: (I) The Sphere", http://www.research.att.com/~njas/doc/doeh.pdf.
19. JOHN, J. A. and MITCHELL, T. J. (1977), "Optimal Incomplete Block Designs". Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 39, pp. 39-43.
20. KIEFER, J. (1960). "Optimum Experimental Designs V, with Applications to Systematic and Rotatable Designs". Proceedings of the 4th Berkeley Symposium 1, pp. 381-405.
21. KOWALSKI, S.; CORNELL, J. A.; and VINING, G. G. (2000). "A New Model and Class of Designs for Mixture Experiments with Process Variables". Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods 29, pp. 2255-2280.
22. LETSINGER, J. D.; MYERS, R. H.; and LENTNER, M. (1996). "Response Surface Methods for Bi-Randomization Structures". Journal of Quality Technology 28, pp. 381-397.
23. LUCAS, J. M. (1976). "Which Response Surface Design Is Best". Technometrics 18, pp. 411-417.
24. MEE, R. W. (2002). "Three-Level Simplex Designs and Their Use in Sequential Experimentation". Journal of Quality Technology 34, pp. 152-164.
25. MITCHELL, T. J. and BAYNE, C. K. (1978). "D-Optimal Fractions of Three-Level Factorial Designs". Technometrics 20, pp. 369-380.
26. MORRIS, M. D. (2000). "A Class of Three-Level Experimental Designs for Response Surface Modeling". Technometrics 42, pp. 111-121.
27. MYERS, R. H. and MONTGOMERY, D. C. (1995). Response Surface Methodology. Wiley, New York, NY.
28. MYERS, R. H.; VINING, G. G.; GIOVANNITTI-JENSEN, A.; and MYERS, S. L. (1992). "Variance Dispersion Properties of Second-Order Response Surface Designs". Journal of Quality Technology 24, pp. 1-11.
29. SAS (2004). SAS Version 9.1. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
30. SNEE, R. D. (1985). "Computer-Aided Design of Experiments -Some Practical Experiences". Journal of Quality Technology 17, pp. 222-236.
31. SRINIVAS, D.; RAO, J. K.; THÉODORE, K.; and PANDA, T. (1995). "Direct Conversion of Cellulosic Material to Ethanol by the Intergeneric Fusant Trichoderma Reesei QM 9414/Saccharomyces Cerevisiae NCIM 3288". Enzyme and Microbial Technology 17, pp. 418-423.
32. THOMAS, R. S.; SODERBORG, N. S.; and BORDERS, S. G. (2005). "Using Computer-Aided Engineering to Find and Avoid Steering Wheel 'Nibble' Failure Mode". SAE 2005 World Congress Presentation, Detroit, MI.
33. TRINCA, L. A. and GILMOUR, S. G. (2001). "Multistratum Response Surface Designs". Technometrics 43, pp. 25-33.
34. VINING, G. G.; KOWALSKI, S. M.; and MONTGOMERY, D. G. (2005). "Response Surface Designs Within a Split-Plot Structure". Journal of Quality Technology 37, pp. 115-129.
35. VUCHKOV, I. N.; DAMGALIEV, D. L.; and VONTCHEV, C. A. (1981). "Sequentially Generated Second Order Quasi D-Optimal Designs for Experiments with Mixture and Process Variables". Technometrics 23, pp. 233-238.
36. WU, C. F. J. and DING, Y. (1998). "Construction of Response Surface Designs for Qualitative and Quantitative Factors". Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 71, pp. 331-348.