Cortical categorization failure in 2-month-old infants at risk for dyslexia

NeuroReport

Volumn 18, Issue 9, 2007, Pages 857-861

  Van Leeuwen, Theo ^a,b   Been, Pieter ^c   Van Herten, Marieke ^d   Zwarts, Frans ^c   Maassen, Ben ^d   Van Der Leij, Aryan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b SLOTERVAART HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^d RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Auditory processing; Categorization; Dyslexia; Event related potentials; Genetic risk; Infants; Lateralization

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DYSLEXIA; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; EVOKED RESPONSE; FEMALE; GENETIC RISK; HIGH RISK INFANT; HUMAN; INFANT; LEFT HEMISPHERE; MALE; PHONEME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RIGHT HEMISPHERE; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SPEECH;

AUDITORY PERCEPTION; BRAIN MAPPING; CEREBRAL CORTEX; DYSLEXIA; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; INFANT; MALE; RISK; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 34249027258     PISSN: 09594965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e3280c1e2bf     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Pennington BF, Lefly DL. Early reading development in children at family risk for dyslexia. Child Dev 2001; 72:816-833.
2. Bradley L, Bryant P. Categorizing sounds and learning to read: a causal connexion. Nature 1983; 301:419-421.
3. Eden GF, VanMeter JW, Rumsey JW, Maisog J, Zeffiro TA. Functional MRI reveals differences in visual motion processing in individuals with dyslexia. Nature 1996; 382:66-69.
4. Paulesu E, Demonet JF, Fazio F, McCrory E, Chanoine V, Brunswick N, et al. Dyslexia: cultural diversity and biological unity. Science 2001; 291:2165-2167.
5. Ramus F, Rosen S, Dakin SC, Day BL, Castellote JM, White S, Frith U. Theories of developmental dyslexia: insights from a multiple case study of dyslexic adults. Brain 2003; 126:841-865.
6. Habib M. The neurological basis of developmental dyslexia: an overview and working hypothesis. Brain 2000; 123:2373-2399.
7. Griffiths YM, Snowling MJ. Predictors of exception word and nonword reading in dyslexic children: the severity hypothesis. J Educ Psychol 2002; 94:34-43.
8. Tallal P. Auditory temporal perception, phonics, and reading disabilities in children. Brain Lang 1980; 36:182-198.
9. Poldrack RA, Temple E, Protopapas A, Nagarajan S, Tallal P, Merzenich M, et al. Relations between the neural bases of dynamic auditory processing and phonological processing: evidence from fMRI. J Cogn Neurosci 2001; 13:687-697.
10. Werker J, Tees R. Speech perception in severely disabled and average reading children. Can J Psychol 1987; 41:48-61.
11. Tallal P, Piercy M. Developmental aphasia: rate of auditory processing and selective impairment of consonant perception. Neuropsychologia 1974; 12:83-93.
12. Aslin RN, Pisoni DB, Jusczyk PW. Auditory development and speech perception in infancy. In: Mussen PH, Haith MM, Campos JJ, editors. Handbook of child psychology. Infancy and developmental psychology. New York: Wiley; 1983. pp. 573-687.
13. Friedrich M, Weber C, Friederici AD. Electrophysiological evidence for delayed mismatch response in infants at-risk for specific language impairment. Psychophysiology 2004; 41:772-782.
14. Benasich AA, Choudhury N, Friedman JT, Realpe-Bonilla T, Chojnowska C, Gou Z. The infant as a prelinguistic model for language learning impairments: predicting from event-related potentials to behavior. Neuropsychologia 2006; 44:396-411.
15. van Leeuwen T, Been P, Kuijpers C, Zwarts F, Maassen B, Van der Leij A. Mismatch response is absent in 2-month-old infants at risk for dyslexia. NeuroReport 2006; 17:351-355.
16. Dehaene-Lambertz G, Gliga T. Common neural basis for phoneme processing in infants and adults. J Cogn Neurosci 2004; 16:1375-1387.
17. Dehaene-Lambertz G, Baillet S. A phonological representation in the infant brain. NeuroReport 1998; 9:1885-1888.
18. Lehmann D, Skrandies W. Reference-free identification of components of checkerboard-evoked multichannel potential fields. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1980; 48:609-621.
19. Pascual-Marqui RD, Michel CM, Lehmann D. Low resolution electromagnetic tomography: a new method for localizing electrical activity in the brain. Int J Psychophysiol 1994; 18:49-65.
20. Kuijpers C, Van der Leij A, Been P, Van Leeuwen T, Ter Keurs M, Schreuder R, et al. Leesproblemen in het voortgezet onderwijs en de volwassenheid. Pedagogische Studiën 2003; 80:272-287.
21. van Beinum FJ, Schwippert CE, Been PH, van Leeuwen TH, Kuijpers CTL. Development and application of a /bAk/-/dAk/continuum for testing auditory perception within the Dutch longitudinal dyslexia study. Speech Commun 2005; 47:124-142.
22. Serniclaes W, Van Heghe S, Mousty Ph, Carré R, Sprenger-Charolles L. Allophonic mode of speech perception in dyslexia. J Exp Child Psychol 2004; 87:336-361.
23. Kuhl PK. Early language acquisition: cracking the speech code. Nature Rev Neurosci 2004; 5:831-843.
24. Belin P, Zilbovicius M, Crozier S, Thivard L, Fontaine A, Masure M-C, Samson Y. Lateralization of speech and auditory temporal processing. J Cogn Neurosci 1998; 10:536-540.
25. Galaburda AM, Sherman GF, Rosen GD, Aboitiz F, Geschwind N. Developmental dyslexia: four consecutive patients with cortical anomalies. Ann Neurol 1985; 18:222-233.