Mismatch response is absent in 2-month-old infants at risk for dyslexia

NeuroReport

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 351-355

  Van Leeuwen, Theo ^a,b   Been, Pieter ^c   Kuijpers, Cecile ^d   Zwarts, Frans ^c   Maassen, Ben ^e   Van Der Leij, Aryan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b SLOTERVAART HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^d RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^e RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Auditory processing; Dyslexia; Event related potentials; Genetic risk; Infants; Mismatch negativity

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BRAIN CORTEX; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DYSLEXIA; FEMALE; GENETIC RISK; HEARING; HUMAN; HYPOACUSIS; INFANCY; INFANT; KINDERGARTEN; MALE; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECORDING; RISK ASSESSMENT; SPEECH; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TOPOGRAPHY; AGE; AUDITORY CORTEX; AUDITORY NERVOUS SYSTEM; AUDITORY STIMULATION; EVOKED RESPONSE; GENETIC PREDISPOSITION; GENETICS; LANGUAGE TEST; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PERCEPTION DEAFNESS; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TIME;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; AGE FACTORS; AUDITORY CORTEX; AUDITORY PATHWAYS; AUDITORY PERCEPTUAL DISORDERS; DYSLEXIA; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; GENETIC PREDISPOSITION TO DISEASE; HUMANS; INFANT; LANGUAGE TESTS; MALE; REACTION TIME; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 33646678196     PISSN: 09594965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.wnr.0000203624.02082.2d     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Pennington BF, Lefly DL. Early reading development in children at family risk for dyslexia. Child Dev 2001; 72:816-833.
2. Bradley L, Bryant P. Categorizing sounds and learning to read: a causal connexion. Nature 1983; 301:419-421.
3. Eden GF, VanMeter JW, Rumsey JW, Maisog J, Zeffiro TA. Functional MRI reveals differences in visual motion processing in individuals with dyslexia. Nature 1996; 382:66-69.
4. Paulesu E, Demonet JF, Fazio F, McCrory E, Chanoine V, Brunswick N, et al. Dyslexia: cultural diversity and biological unity. Science 2001; 291:2165-2167.
5. Tallal P. Auditory temporal perception, phonics, and reading disabilities in children. Brain Lang 1980; 36:182-198.
6. Poldrack RA, Temple E, Protopapas A, Nagarajan S, Tallal P, Merzenich M, et al. Relations between the neural bases of dynamic auditory processing and phonological processing: evidence from fMRI. J Cogn Neurosci 2001; 13:687-697.
7. Werker J, Tees R. Speech perception in severely disabled and average reading children. Can J Psychol 1987; 41:48-61.
8. Tallal P, Piercy M. Developmental aphasia: rate of auditory processing and selective impairment of consonant perception. Neuropsychologia 1974; 12:83-93.
9. Aslin RN, Pisoni DB, Jusczyk PW. Auditory development and speech perception in infancy. In: Mussen PH, Haith MM, Campos JJ, editors. Handbook of child psychology. Infancy and developmental psychology. New York: Wiley; 1983. pp. 573-687.
10. Dehaene-Lambertz G, Gliga T. Common neural basis for phoneme processing in infants and adults. J Cogn Neurosci 2004; 16:1375-1387.
11. Lyytinen H, Guttorm TK, Huttunen T, Hämäläinen J, Leppänen PHT, Vesterinen M. Psychophysiology of developmental dyslexia: a review of findings including studies of children at risk for dyslexia. J Neurolinguist 2005; 18:167-195.
12. Leppänen PH, Richardson U, Pihko E, Eklund KM, Guttorm TK, Aro M, et al. Brain responses to changes in speech sound durations differ between infants with and without familial risk for dyslexia. Dev Neuropsychol 2002; 22:407-422.
13. Molfese DL. Predicting dyslexia at 8 years of age using neonatal brain responses. Brain Lang 2000; 72:238-245.
14. Näätänen R. The perception of speech sounds by the human brain as reflected by the mismatch negativity (MMN) and its magnetic equivalent (MMNm). Psychophysiology 2001; 38:1-21.
15. Cheour M, Kushnerenko E, Čeponienė R, Fellman V, Näätänen R. Electric brain responses obtained from newborn infants to changes in duration in complex harmonic tones. Dev Neuropsychol 2002; 22:471-479.
16. Dehaene-Lambertz G, Dehaene S. Speed and cerebral correlates of syllable discrimination in infants. Nature 1994; 370:292-295.
17. Kushnerenko E, Čeponienė R, Balan P, Fellman V, Näätänen R. Maturation of the auditory change detection response in infants: a longitudinal ERP study. Neuroreport 2002; 13:1843-1848.
18. Friederici AD, Friedrich M, Weber C. Neural manifestation of cognitive and precognitive mismatch detection in early infancy. Neuroreport 2002; 13:1252-1254.
19. Dehaene-Lambertz G, Pena M. Electrophysiological evidence for automatic phonetic processing in neonates. Neuroreport 2001; 12:3155-3158.
20. van Beinum FJ, Schwippert CE, Been PH, van Leeuwen TH, Kuijpers CTL. Development and application of a /bAk/-/dAk/ continuum for testing auditory perception within the Dutch longitudinal dyslexia study. Speech Comm 2005; 47:124-142.
21. Kuijpers C, Van der Leij A, Been P, Van Leeuwen T, Ter Keurs M, Schreuder R, et al. Leesproblemen in het voortgezet onderwijs en de volwassenheid. Pedagog Stud 2003; 80:272-287.
22. Strik WK, Fallgatter AJ, Brandeis D, Pascual-Marqui RD. Three-dimensional tomography of event-related potentials during response inhibition: evidence for phasic frontal lobe activation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1998; 108:406-413.
23. Pascual-Marqui RD, Michel CM, Lehmann D. Low resolution electromagnetic tomography: a new method for localizing electrical activity in the brain. Int J Psychophysiol 1994; 18:49-65.
24. Friedrich M, Weber C, Friederici AD. Electrophysiological evidence for delayed mismatch response in infants at-risk for specific language impairment. Psychophysiology 2004; 41:772-782.
25. Maurer U, Bucher K, Brem S, Brandeis D. Altered responses to tone and phoneme mismatch in kindergartners at familial dyslexia risk. Neuroreport 2003; 14:2245-2250.