Electrocerebral silence after intracarotid propofol injection is a function of transit time

Anesthesia and Analgesia

Volumn 104, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 1498-1503

  Wang, Mei ^a   Joshi, Shailendra ^a  

^a Columbia University ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE; ESMOLOL; KETAMINE; PROPOFOL;

ARTICLE; BOLUS INJECTION; BRAIN CIRCULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG ABSORPTION; DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM; DRUG DOSE COMPARISON; DRUG EFFECT; DRUG ELIMINATION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EMULSION; MICROSCOPY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RABBIT; RESPONSE TIME; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;

ANIMALS; CAROTID ARTERIES; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; INJECTIONS, INTRA-ARTICULAR; PROPOFOL; RABBITS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 34249021040     PISSN: 00032999     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1213/01.ane.0000264089.72804.54     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Siepmann J. Local controlled drug delivery to the brain. Int J Pharm 2006;314:99-100.
2. Joshi S, Wang M, Etu JJ, et al. Cerebral blood flow affects dose requirements of intracarotid propofol for electrocerebral silence. Anesthesiology 2006;104:290-8.
3. Gelb AW, Zhang C, Hamilton JT. Propofol induces dilation and inhibits constriction in guinea pig basilar arteries. Anesth Analg 1996;83:472-6.
4. Joshi S, Wang M, Hartl R. Retinal discoloration test. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2004;24:305-8.
5. Joshi S, Wang M, Etu JJ, Pile-Spellman J. Bolus configuration affects dose requirements of intracarotid propofol for electroencephalographic silence. Anesth Analg 2006;102:1816-22.
6. Joshi S, Wang M, Etu JJ, Pile-Spellman J. Reducing cerebral blood flow increases the duration of electroencephalographic silence by intracarotid thiopental. Anesth Analg 2005;101:851-8.
7. Hartl R, Joshi S, Levine S, et al. Pial arterial response to topical verapamil in acute closed cranial windows in rabbits. Anesth Analg 2005;100:1140-6.
8. Cenic A, Craen RA, Howard-Lech VL, et al. Cerebral blood volume and blood flow at varying arterial carbon dioxide tension levels in rabbits during propofol anesthesia. Anesth Analg 2000;90:1376-83.
9. Dutta S, Ebling WF. Formulation-dependent brain and lung distribution kinetics of propofol in rats. Anesthesiology 1998;89:678-85.
10. Fechner J, Ihmsen H, Hatterscheid D, et al. Comparative pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the new propofol prodrug GPI 15715 and propofol emulsion. Anesthesiology 2004;101:626-39.
11. Boyd BJ. Characterisation of drug release from cubosomes using the pressure ultrafiltration method. Int J Pharm 2003;260:239-47.
12. Cenic A, Nabavi DG, Craen RA, et al. Dynamic CT measurement of cerebral blood flow: a validation study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999;20:63-73.
13. Mourant JR, Johnson TM, Los G, Bigio IJ. Non-invasive measurement of chemotherapy drug concentrations in tissue: preliminary demonstrations of in vivo measurements. Phys Med Biol 1999;44:1397-417.
14. Bigio IJ, Mourant JR, Los G. Noninvasive, in-situ measurement of drug concentrations in tissue using optical spectroscopy. J Gravit Physiol 1999;6:173-5.
15. Billard V, Gambus PL, Chamoun N, et al. A comparison of spectral edge, delta power, and bispectral index as EEG measures of alfentanil, propofol, and midazolam drug effect. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1997;61:45-58.