Double objects, causatives, and derivational economy

Linguistic Inquiry

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 146-173

  Fujita, Koji ^a  

^a OSAKA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Criterion; Agent; Case checking; Causer; Economy of derivation; LF reconstruction; Minimal Link Condition; VP intemal backward binding

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038888507     PISSN: 00243892     EISSN: 00243892     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Aoun, Joseph, and Yen-hui Audrey Li. 1989. Scope and constituency. Linguistic Inquiry 20:141-172.
2. Barss, Andrew, and Howard Lasnik. 1986. A note on anaphora and double objects. Linguistic Inquiry 17: 347-354.
3. Belletti, Adriana, and Luigi Rizzi. 1988. Psych-verbs and θ-theory. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 6:291-352.
4. Bowers, John. 1993. The syntax of predication. Linguistic Inquiry 24:591-656.
5. Burzio, Luigi. 1986. Italian syntax: A Government-Binding approach. Dordrecht: Reidel.
6. Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
7. Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin, and use. New York: Praeger.
8. Chomsky, Noam. 1993. A minimalist program for linguistic theory. In The view from Building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, ed. Kenneth Hale and Samuel Jay Keyser, 1-52. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
9. Chomsky, Noam. 1994. Bare phrase structure. MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 5. MITWPL, Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
10. Chomsky, Noam, and Howard Lasnik. 1993. The theory of principles and parameters. In Syntax: An international handbook of contemporary research, vol. 1, ed. Joachim Jacobs, Arnim von Stechow, Wolfgang Sternefeld, and Theo Vennemann, 506-569. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
11. Collins, Chris, and Höskuldur Thráinsson. 1993. Object shift in double object constructions and the theory of Case. In MIT working papers in linguistics 19: Papers on Case & agreement II, 131-174. MITWPL, Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
12. Erteschik-Shir, Nomi. 1979. Discourse constraints on dative movement. In Syntax and semantics 12: Discourse and syntax, ed. Talmy Givón, 441-467. New York: Academic Press.
13. Fagan, Sarah M. B. 1992. The syntax and semantics of middle constructions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. Fujita, Koji. 1993. Object movement and binding at LF. Linguistic Inquiry 24:381-388.
15. Fujita, Koji. 1994a. Middle, ergative and passive in English: A minimalist perspective. In MIT working papers in linguistics 22: The morphology-syntax connection, 71-90. MITWPL, Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
16. Fujita, Koji. 1994b. The syntax of middle and ergative formations in English. Ms., Osaka University, Osaka, and MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
17. Hale, Kenneth, and Samuel Jay Keyser. 1987. A view from the middle. Lexicon Project Working Papers 10. Center for Cognitive Science, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
18. Hale, Kenneth, and Samuel Jay Keyser. 1993. On argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations. In The view from Building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, ed. Kenneth Hale and Samuel Jay Keyser, 53-109. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
19. Hoekstra, Eric. 1991. On double objects in English and Dutch. In Views on phrase structure, ed. Katherine Leffel and Denis Bouchard, 83-95. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
20. Hornstein, Norbert. 1994. An argument for minimalism: The case of antecedent-contained deletion. Linguistic Inquiry 25:455-480.
21. Jackendoff, Ray. 1994. Lexical insertion in a post-minimalist theory of grammar. Ms., Brandeis University, Waltham, Mass.
22. Katada, Fusa. 1991. The LF representation of anaphors. Linguistic Inquiry 22:287-313.
23. Keyser, Samuel Jay, and Thomas Roeper. 1984. On the middle and ergative constructions in English. Linguistic Inquiry 15:381-416.
24. Kitagawa, Yoshihisa. 1994. Shells, yolks, and scrambled e.g.s. In Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society 24, 221-239. GLSA, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
25. Kitahara, Hisatsugu. 1994. Raising quantifiers without quantifier raising. Ms., Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass.
26. Koizumi, Masatoshi. 1993. Object agreement phrases and the split VP hypothesis. In MIT working papers in linguistics 18: Papers on Case & agreement I, 99-148. MITWPL, Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
27. Larson, Richard. 1988. On the double object construction. Linguistic Inquiry 19:335-391.
28. Larson, Richard. 1990. Double objects revisited: Reply to Jackendoff. Linguistic Inquiry 21:589-632.
29. Lasnik, Howard. 1993. Lectures on minimalist syntax. University of Connecticut Working Papers in Linguistics: Occasional Papers 1. Department of Linguistics, University of Connecticut, Storrs. Distributed by MITWPL, Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
30. Lasnik, Howard. 1995. Case and expletives revisited: On Greed and other human failings. Linguistic Inquiry 26:615-633.
31. Lee, R. 1992. Reconstruction and the checking theory. Paper presented at the 67th Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America.
32. Oehrle, Richard. 1976. The grammatical status of the English dative alternation. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
33. Pesetsky, David. 1995. Zero syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
34. Rapoport, T. R. 1993. Verbs in depictives and resultatives. In Semantics and the lexicon, ed. James Pustejovsky, 163-184. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
35. Saito, Mamoru. 1992. Long distance scrambling in Japanese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 1:69-118.
36. Ura, Hiroyuki. 1994. Varieties of raising and the feature-based bare phrase structure theory. MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 7. MITWPL, Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
37. Zubizarreta, Maria Luisa. 1992. The lexical encoding of scope relations among arguments. In Syntax and semantics 26: Syntax and the lexicon, ed. Tim Stowell and Eric Wehrli, 211-258. San Diego, Calif.: Academic Press.