Convention from below: Negotiating interaction and culture in argumentative writing

Written Communication

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 382-413

  Evensen, Lars Sigfred ^a  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248718204     PISSN: 07410883     EISSN: 15528472     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/074108802237750     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Albrechtsen, D., Evensen, L. S., Lindeberg, A.-C., & Linnarud, M. (1991). Analyzing developing discourse structure: The NORDWRITE Project. In R. Phillipson, E. Kellerman, L. Selinker, M. Sharwood-Smith, & M. Swain (Eds.), Foreign/second language pedagogy research (pp. 79-91). Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters.
2. Bäcklund, I. (1988). Grounds for prominence. On hierarchies and grounding in English expository text. Studia Neophilologica, 60, 37-61.
3. Bakhtin, M. (1981). Forms of time and of the chronotope in the novel. In M. Holquist (Ed.), The dialogic imagination (C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans., pp. 84-258). Austin: University of Texas Press.
4. Bakhtin, M. (1984). Problems of Dostoevsky's poetics (C. Emerson, Ed. and Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
5. Bakhtin, M.(1986).Speech genres and other late essays(C. Emerson& M. Holquist, Eds.; V. McGee, Trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press.
6. Bakhtin, M. (1990). Art and answerability: Early philosophical essays (M. Holquist & V. Liapunov, Eds.; V. Liapunov, Trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press.
7. Bazerman, C. (1988). Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
8. Berkenkotter, C., & Huckin, T. N. (1995). Genre knowledge in interdisciplinary communication: Cognition/culture/power. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9. Britton, J. (1983). Shaping at the point of utterance. In A. Freedman, I. Pringle, & J. Yalden (Eds.), Learning to write: First language/second language (pp. 13-19). London: Longman.
10. Britton, J., Burgess, T., Martin, N., McLeod, A., & Rosen, H. (1975). The development of writing abilities (11-18). London: Macmillan.
11. Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities of practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning and innovation. Organizational Science, 2, 40-57.
12. Bruner, J. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13. Chafe, W. (1987). Cognitive constraints on information flow. In R. Tomlin (Ed.), Coherence and grounding in discourse: Typological studies in language (Vol. 11, pp. 21-51). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.
14. Chvany, C. V. (1985). Foregrounding, "transitivity," salience in sequential and nonsequential prose. Essays in Poetics, 10(2), 1-26.
15. Clark, H. C. (1996). Using language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
16. Coe, R. M. (1994). "An arousing and fulfillment of desires": The rhetoric of genre in the process era-And beyond. In A. Freedman & P. Medway (Eds.), Genre and the new rhetoric (pp. 181-190). London: Taylor & Francis.
17. Cohen, M., Riel M.(1989). The effectofdistant audiencesonstudents' writing. American Educational Research Journal, 26, 143-159.
18. Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki, Finland: Orienta-Konsultit.
19. Evensen, L. S. (1989). Contrastive rhetoric and developing discourse strategies. Trondheim Papers in Applied Linguistics, 5, 20-45.
20. Evensen, L. S. (1991). Alternative worlds: Actual student writers. In J. Smidt & L. S. Evensen (Eds.), Roller i relieff: Skrivestrategier-tekster-lesestrategier [Roles in relief: Writer strategies-texts-reader strategies] (DEVEL Report No. 6). Trondheim, Norway: ALLFORSK.
21. Evensen, L. S. (1992a). Emerging peaks, turbulent surfaces: Advanced development in student argumentative writing. In A. M.L. Olsen & A.M. Simensen (Eds.), Essays in honour of Eva Sivertsen(pp. 111-130). Oslo, Norway: Scandinavian University Press.
22. Evensen, L. S. (1992b). Asense of relief: Backgrounding in student argumentative writing. In A-C. Lindeberg, N. E. Enkvist, &K. Wikberg (Eds.), Nordic research on text and discourse (pp. 211-222). Åbo, Finland: Åbo Akademy Press.
23. Evensen, L. S. (1999). Elevtekster i dobbel dialog: Om mottakere, sjanger og respons i pedagogiske skriveprosesser [Students' texts in double dialogue: On audience, genre and response in educational writing processes]. In P. Linell, L. Ahrenberg, & L. Jönsson (Eds.), Samtal och språkanvändning i professionerna [Dialogue and language use in the professions] (ASLA Publications, Vol. 11) (pp. 49-64). Uppsala, Sweden: ASLA.
24. Evensen, L. S. (2000). Communication as pedagogical revolution. In K. Sjöholm & A.Østern (Eds.), Perspectives on language and communication in multilingual education (pp. 73-90). Vaasa, Finland: Åbo Akademi University.
25. Evensen, L. S. (2001a). Grounding in interaction. In P. Coppock (Ed.), The semiotics of writing: Transdisciplinary perspectives on the technology of writing: Semiotic and cognitive studies (Vol. 10, pp. 137-155). Turnhout, Belgium: Brepols.
26. Evensen, L. S. (2001b). From dialogue to dialogism: The confessions of a writing researcher. Manuscript submitted for publication.
27. Evensen, L. S., Halse, M. E., Hoel, T. L., Lorentzen, R. T., Moslet, I., & Smidt, J. (1991). Utvikling av skriftspråklig kompetanse: Forsningsbakgrunn og kunnskapsutfordringer [Developing written language competence: Research backgrounds and challenges of knowledge] (DEVEL Report No. 1). Trondheim, Norway: ALLFORSK.
28. Fleischman, S. (1985). Discourse functions of tense-aspect oppositions in narrative: Toward a theory of grounding. Linguistics, 23, 851-882.
29. Freedman, A. (1994). "Do as I say": The relationship between teaching and learning new genres. In A. Freedman & P. Medway (Eds.), Genre and the new rhetoric (pp.191-210). London: Taylor & Francis.
30. Freedman, A., & Medway, P.(Eds.).Genre and the new rhetoric. London: Taylor&Francis.
31. Givon, T. (1979). On understanding grammar. New York: Academic Press.
32. Graumann, C. F. (1989). Perspective setting and taking in verbal interaction. In R. Dietrich & C. F. Graumann (Eds.), Language processing in social context (pp. 95-121). North Holland: Elsevier.
33. Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Edward Arnold.
34. Hillocks, G. (1986). Research on written composition: New directions for teaching. Urbana, IL: NCRE/ERIC.
35. Holquist, M. (1990). Introduction: The architectonics of answerability. In M. Holquist & V. Liapunov (Eds.), Art and answerability: Early philosophical essays by M. M. Bakhtin (pp. ix-xlix). Austin: University of Texas Press.
36. Hopper, P. (1979). Aspect and foregrounding in discourse. In T. Givon (Ed.), Discourse and syntax: Syntax and semantics (Vol. 12, pp. 213-241). New York: Academic Press.
37. Hopper, P. (Ed.). (1982). Tense-aspect: Between semantics and pragmatics. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.
38. Hymes, D. (1974). Foundations in sociolinguistics: An ethnographic approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
39. Isaksson-Wikberg, M. (1999). Negotiated and committed argumentation: A cross-cultural study of American and Finland-Swedish student writing. Åbo, Finland: Åbo Akademi University Press.
40. Linell, P. (1998). Approaching dialogue: Talk, interaction and contexts in dialogical perspectives. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.
41. Lotman, J. (1990). Universe of the mind: A semiotic theory of culture. New York: Tauris.
42. Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
43. Miller, C. R. (1984). Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70, 151-167.
44. Miller, C. R. (1994). Rhetorical community: The cultural basis of genre. In A. Freedman &P.Medway (Eds.), Genre and the new rhetoric(pp. 67-78). London: Taylor&Francis.
45. NORDWRITE Project Group. (1987). Nordwrite Reports II: Exploratory studies. Norway: University of Trondheim, The NORDWRITE Project Group.
46. NORDWRITE Project Group. (1988). Nordwrite Reports III: Interim report on material and methods. Norway: University of Trondheim, The NORDWRITE Project Group.
47. Nystrand, M. (1986). The structure of written communication: Studies in reciprocity between writers and readers. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
48. Nystrand, M. (1989). A social-interactive model of writing. Written Communication, 6, 66-85.
49. Nystrand, M. (1992). Social interactionism versus social constructionism: Bakhtin, Rommetveit, and the semiotics of written texts. In A. H. Wold (Ed.), The dialogical alternative: Towardsatheory of language and mind(pp. 157-173). Oslo, Norway: Scandinavian University Press.
50. Nystrand, M. (1993, November 20). On the dialogic nature of discourse and learning. Paper presented at the NCTE colloquium, "The Social Construction of Literacy: Perspectives and Issues for Integration," Pittsburgh, PA.
51. Nystrand, M., Greene, S., & Wiemelt, J. (1993). Where did composition studies come from? Towardan intellectual history ofwriting research.Written Communication,10, 267-333.
52. Ongstad, S. (2002). Positioning early research on writing in Norway. Written Communication, 19(3), 345-381.
53. Reinhart, T. (1984). Principles of gestalt perception in the temporal organization of narrative text. Linguistics, 22, 779-802.
54. Rommetveit, R. (1974). On message structure: A framework for the study of language and communication. London: John Wiley.
55. Rommetveit, R. (1992). Outlines of a dialogically based social-cognitive approach to human communication and cognition. In A. H. Wold (Ed.), The dialogical alternative: Towards a theory of language and mind (pp. 19-44). Oslo, Norway: Scandinavian University Press.
56. Schütz, A., & Luckmann, T. (1984). The structures of the life-world (Vol. 1). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press. (Original work published 1973)
57. Smidt, J. (1992). Elevers skriving og læreres kommentarer til elevtekster i et interaksjonistisk perspektiv [Student writing and teacher comments to student texts within an interactionist perspective] (DEVEL Report No. 9). Trondheim, Norway: ALLFORSK.
58. Smidt, J. (2002). Double histories in multivocal classrooms: Notes toward an ecological account of writing. Written Communication, 19(3), 414-443.
59. Stubbs, M. (1983). Discourse analysis: The sociolinguistic analysis of natural language. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
60. Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
61. Vološinov, V. N. (1973). Marxism and the philosophy of language. New York: Seminar.
62. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
63. Vygotsky, L. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
64. Weber, J. J. (1983). The foreground-background distinction. Language and Literature, 8, 1-15.
65. Wertsch J.V.(1991).Voices of the mind: Asociocultural approach to mediated action. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.