Positioning early research on writing in Norway

Written Communication

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 345-381

  Ongstad, Sigmund ^a  

^a OSLO METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33645682858     PISSN: 07410883     EISSN: 15528472     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/074108802237749     Document Type: Article

References (160)

1. Aase, L. (1988). Stilskriving og danning [Stil writing and bildung]. Oslo, Norway: Landslaget for norskundervisning/Cappelen.
2. Bakhtin, M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays. Austin: University of Texas Press. (Original work published 1979)
3. Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind. New York: Ballantine.
4. Bauman, Z. (1995). Postmodern etik [Postmodern ethics]. Gothenburg, Sweden: Daidalos. (Original work published 1993)
5. Ben-Amos, D. (1969). Analytical categories and ethnic genres. Genre, 2/3, 275-301.
6. Berge, K. L. (1985). Artiumsstilen som genre [The artiumstil as genre]. Unpublished hovedfag thesis, Oslo University, Oslo, Norway.
7. Berge, K. L. (1988). Skolestilen som genre: Med påtvungen penn [The school stil as genre: With imposed pen]. Oslo, Norway: Landslaget for norskundervisning/Cappelen.
8. Berge, K. L. (1996). Norsksensorers tekstnormer og doxa: En kultursemiotisk og sosiotekstologisk analyse[Text norms and doxaof examiners ofNorwegian:Acultural semiotic and socio-textological analysis]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
9. Berge, K. L. (1999). Semiotikk er uunnværlig [Semiotics is indispensable]. Retrieved from http://www.apollon.uio.no/apollon01-99/11.html
10. Berge, K. L. (in press). Hidden norms inassessment of students' exam essaysin Norwegian upper secondary schools. Written Communication.
11. Berge, K. L., Coppock, P., & Maagerø, E. (1998). A ° skape mening med språk: En samling artikler av M.A.K. Halliday, R. Hasan, og J. R. Martin [To create meaning by language: A collection of articles by M.A.K. Halliday, R. Hasan, and J. R. Martin]. Oslo, Norway: Landslaget for norskundervisning/Cappelen Akademisk.
12. Bergersen, H. (1957).Rettskrivingsfeil hos barn [Children's spelling mistakes]. Oslo, Norway: Gyldendal.
13. Bertheussen,B. (1968). Undervisningserfaring og karaktersetting [The experienceofteach-ing and marking]. Unpublished magister artium dissertation, University of Trondheim, Norway.
14. Bjarvin, T. (1946). Skriftspråkets setningsbygning i skolealderen [The structure of sentences in written languageinthe school years]. Unpublished magister artium dissertation, Oslo University, Norway.
15. Björnsson, C. H. (1960). Uppsatsbedömning och uppsatsskrivning [Assessing and writing school assignments]. Stockholm, Sweden: Almqvist & Wiksell.
16. Boø, O. (1973). Types of orthographic error: Relations between the types of errors and their connections with auditory discrimination and auditory memory. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 17, 95-115.
17. Bostad, F. (1998). Teknologiens uunnværlige kontekst: Et semiotisk perspektiv på meningsskaping i hypermedier [Technology's indispensable context: A semiotic perspective on meaning making in hypermedia]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
18. Britton, J., Burgess, T., Martin, N., McLeod, A., & Rosen, H. (1975). The development of writing abilities: 11-18. London: Macmillan.
19. Bue, T. (1955). Pedagogisk metodikk: Innføring i allmenn didaktikk [Pedagogical methods: Introduction to general pedagogy]. Oslo, Norway: Gyldendal Norsk Forlag.
20. Bühler, K. (1965). Sprachtheorie [Theory of language]. Stuttgart, Germany: Fischer. (Original work published 1934)
21. Bühler, K. (1990). Theory of language: The representational function of language (D. F. Goodwin, Trans.). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Benjamin. (Original work published 1934)
22. Chomsky, C. (1969). The acquisition of syntax in children from 5 to 10. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23. Christensen, F. (1968). The problem of defining a mature style. English Journal, 57, 572-578.
24. Clausen, S. (1938). Retstavning: Forholdet mellom skrifttegn og tale [Correct spelling: The relationship between orthography and speech]. Pedagogisk Tidskrift, 74, 9-10, 298-314.
25. Coe, R., Lingard, L., & Teslenko, T. (Eds.). (2002). The rhetoric and ideology of genre: Strategies for stability and change. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
26. Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (Eds.). (1993). The powers of literacy: Agenre approach to teaching writing. London: Falmer.
27. Culler, J. (1981). The pursuit of signs: Semiotics, literature, deconstruction. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
28. Davies, B., & Hunt, R. (1994). Classroom competencies and marginal positionings. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 15, 389-408.
29. Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. New York: Macmillan.
30. Dixon, J. (1967). Growth through English. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
31. Dysthe, O. (1993). Writing and talking to learn: A theory-based, interpretative study in three classrooms in the USA and Norway. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Tromsø, Norway.
32. Dysthe, O. (Ed.). (1999). The dialogical perspective and Bakhtin: Conference report. Program for Research on Learning and Instruction, University of Bergen, Norway.
33. Dysthe, O. (in press). Professors as mediators of academic text cultures: An interview study with advisors and master's degree students in three disciplines in a Norwegian university. Written Communication.
34. Dysthe, O., Hertzberg, F., & Hoel, T. L. (2000). Skrive for ålære: Skrivingihøyere utdanning [Writing to learn: Writing in higher education]. Oslo, Norway: Abstrakt forlag.
35. Enkvist, N. E. (1974). Några textlingvistiska grundfrågor [Some basic questions in text linguistics]. In U. Teleman & T. Hultman (Eds.), Språket i bruk [Language in use]. Lund, Sweden: Liber.
36. Erasmie, T. (1975). Language development and social influence. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Linköping, Sweden.
37. Evans, L., & Tsatsaroni, A. (1994). Language and "subjectivity" in the mathematics classroom. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Cultural perspectives on the mathematics classroom. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
38. Evensen, L. S. (1986). Den vet best hvor sko(l)en trykker [The one who knows best where the s(c)ho(ol)e pinches]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Trondheim, Norway.
39. Evensen, L. S. (Ed.). (1986-1989). NORDWRITE Reports (I-IV). Trondheim: Department of Applied Linguistics, University of Trondheim, Norway.
40. Evensen, L. S. (2002). Convention from below: Negotiating interaction and culture in argumentative writing. Written Communication, 19(3), 382-413.
41. Evensen, L. S., & Hoel, T. L. (Eds.). (1997). Skriveteorier og skolepraksis [Theories of writing and the practice of education]. Oslo, Norway: Landslaget for norskundervisning/ Cappelen.
42. Faigley, L. (1986). Competing theoriesofprocess:Acritique anda proposal.College English, 48, 527-542.
43. Fossestøl, B. (1980). Tekst og tekststruktur [Text and text structure]. Oslo, Norway: Universitetsforlaget.
44. Forsøksrådet for skoleverket (FR). (1976). Norsk i sammenholdte klasser [Norwegian in mixed ability classes]. Oslo, Norway: Author.
45. Genre. (2001). Conference. Retrieved from http://www.hio.no/LU/genre2001/
46. Gjessing, H.J.(1953). Lese- og skrivevansker [Reading and writing difficulties].Skole og samfunn, 8, 247-254.
47. Grundin, H. (1975). Läs- og skrivförmågans utveckling genom skolåren. The development of the ability to read and write through school years (Utbildningsforskning Report No. 20). Stockholm, Sweden: Liber.
48. Gundem, B. (1998). Understanding European didactics: An overview. Oslo, Norway: University of Oslo.
49. Gundem, B., & Hopmann, S. (Eds.). (1998). Didaktik and/or curriculum: An international dialogue. New York: Peter Lang.
50. Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action (Vol. 1). (T. McCarthy, Trans.). Boston: Beacon.
51. Habermas, J. (1986). Det modernas normative felt [The normative field of modernity]. In M. Lövgren & A. Molander (Eds.), Postmoderna tider [Postmodern times]. Stockholm, Sweden: Norstedts.
52. Habermas, J. (1998). Postmetaphysical thinking: Philosophical essays. London: Polity.
53. Halliday, M. A. K. (1977). Explorations in the functions of language. London: Arnold.
54. Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic. London: Arnold.
55. Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar (2nd ed.). London: Arnold.
56. Halse, M. (1991). Elevtekster i et tekstrom [Students' texts in a textual space] (SKRIVE-PUFF, Rep. No. 5). Trondheim, Norway: Allforsk, Trondheim University.
57. Halse, M. (1993). Loggen, novellene og jentene [Logs, short stories, and girls]. In I. Moslet &L.S. Evensen (Eds.), Skrivepedagogisk fornying [Innovationsin writing pedagogy]. Oslo, Norway: Ad Notam Gyldendal.
58. Harré, R. (1979). Social being. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
59. Harré, R. (1984). Personal being. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
60. Harré, R. (1991). Physical being. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
61. Harré, R., & van Langenhove, L. (1991). Varieties of positioning. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 21, 393-407.
62. Hennum, T. (1958). Morsmålsstilen ved studenteksamen i Danmark, NorgeogSverige [The mother tongue stil at artium in Denmark, Norway, and Sweden]. Nordisk tidsskrift for pedagogikk, 1, 1-27.
63. Hernadi, P. (1995). Cultural transactions: Nature, self, society. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
64. Hersvall, M., Lindell, E., & Pettersson, I.-L. (1974). Om kvalitet i gymnasisters skriftspråk [On quality inhigh school students' writing] (Pedagogisk psykologiska problem nr. 253). Malmö, Sweden: Lärarhögskolan i Malmö.
65. Hertzberg, F. (1999). Å didaktisere et fag-hva er det? [To "didacticize" a subject- What is that?]. In C. Nyström & M. Ohlsson (Eds.), Svenska i utveckling (FUMS Rapport nr. 196). Uppsala, Sweden: Uppsala University.
66. Hertzberg, J. (1952). Vårt morsmål [Our mother tongue]. Oslo, Norway: Gyldendal Norsk Forlag.
67. Hiim, H., & Hippe, E. (1998). Læring gjennom opplevelse, forståelse og handling [Learning through experience, understanding, and action]. Oslo, Norway: Universitetsforlaget.
68. Hillocks, G. (1984). What works in teaching composition: A meta-analysis of experimental treatment studies. American Journal of Education, 93, 133-170.
69. Hodge, B., & Kress, G. (1988). Social semiotics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
70. Hoel, T. L. (1990). Skrivepedagogikk på norsk [Writing pedagogy in Norway]. Oslo, Norway: Landslaget for norskundervisning/Cappelen.
71. Hoel, T. L. (1995). Elevsamtalar om skriving i vidaregåande skole: Responsgrupper i teori og praksis [Students talking about writing inupper secondary school: Response groups in theory and practice]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Trondheim, Norway.
72. Hoel, T. L. (1997). Innoverretta og utoverretta skriveforskning og skriveteoriar [Introvert and extrovert writing research and writing theories]. In L. S. Evensen & T. L. Hoel (Eds.), Skriveteorier og skolepraksis [Theories of writing and the practice of education]. Oslo, Norway: Landslaget for norskundervisning/Cappelen.
73. Hollway, W. (1984). Gender difference and the production of subjectivity. In J. Henriques, W. Holloway, C. Urwin, C. Venn, & V. Walkerdine (Eds.), Changing the subject: Psychology, social regulation, and subjectivity. London: Methuen.
74. Hultman, T., & Westman, M. (1977). Gymnasistsvenska [High school Swedish]. Lund, Sweden: Liber.
75. Hunt, K. W. (1965). Grammatical structures written at three grade levels (Research Report No. 3). Urbana, IL: National Council for the Teaching of English.
76. Husén, T. (1950). Rättstavingsförmågans psykologi [The psychology of spelling ability]. Stockholm, Sweden: Sveriges allmänna folkskollärarförenings litteratursälskap.
77. Igland, M.-A. (1994). Lærarkommentarar til elevtekstar-undervisningsmåte, språklege uttrykk og klasseromsdiskurs [Teacher comments on students' texts: Ways of teaching, linguistic expressions, and classroom discourse]. In G. Wiggen & C. Elbo (Eds.), Språkvitenskapelige beskrivelsesmodeller i studiet av lesing og skriving [Linguistic models of description in research on reading and writing]. Oslo, Norway: Senter for lærerutdanning og skoletjeneste, Oslo University.
78. Illeris, K. (1999). Læring: aktuell læringsteori i spenningsfeltet mellom Piaget, Freud og Marx [Learning: Current theories of learning in the span between Piaget, Freud, and Marx]. Roskilde, Denmark: Roskilde Universitetsforlag.
79. Jahr, E. H. (1981). Bibliografi over norsk barnespråkslitteratur [Bibliography of Norwegian literature on children's language]. In Norges allmennvitenskapelige forskningsråd: Barnespråksforskning. Konferanserapport. Oslo, Norway: Author.
80. Jank, W., & Meyer, H. (1997). Nyttan av kunnskaper i didaktisk teori [The uses of knowledge in didaktic theory]. In M. Uljens (Ed.), Didaktik-teori, reflektion och praktik [Didaktik-theory, reflection and practice]. Lund, Sweden: Studentlitteratur.
81. Johnsen, E. B. (1994). Oppgavetekst og dannelse: Artiumsstilens emner, formuleringer og forvaltning 1880-1991 [Task-text and 'Bildung': The artiumsstil's topics, formulations, and management, 1880-1991]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Oslo, Norway.
82. The KAL Project. (2002). Retrieved from http://prosjekt.hihm.no/r97-kal/
83. Källgren, G.(1979). Innehåll itext: Ord och stil[Text content: Word and style]. Stockholm, Sweden: Språkvårdsamfundets skrifter.
84. Kirke-og undervisningsdepartementet. (1940). Normalplan (mønsterplan) for landsfolkeskulen [General national curriculum (moensterplan) for primary education]. Oslo, Norway: Aschehoug.
85. Knain, E. (1999). Naturfagets tause stemme: Diskursanalyse av lærebøker for Natur- og miljøfag i et allmenndannelsesperspektiv [The tacit voice of science (in education): Discourse analysis of science and environment textbooks in the perspective of general "Bildung"]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Oslo, Norway.
86. Konzack, L. (1999). Softwaregenrer [Software genres]. Århus, Denmark: Aarhus Universitetsforlag.
87. Krohn-Hansen, A. (1983). Norskskriving eller stilskriving-RVO må velge! [Norwegian writing or stil writing-RVO must choose!]. In Prosjekt skolestil, Hva vil vi med skolestilen?[Whatdowewant for the stil?]. Løvenstad, Norway: Prosjekt skolestil.
88. Kvale, S. (1989).To validate isto question. In S.Kvale (Ed.),Issues of validity in qualitative research. Lund, Sweden: Studentlitteratur.
89. Larsson, K. (1982). Skrivförmåga: Studier i svenskt elevspråk [Writing ability: Studies in Swedish student language]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Uppsala, Sweden.
90. Lindell, E. (1964). Den svenska rättskrivningsmetodiken [Spelling methods in Sweden]. Lund, Sweden: Studia psychologica et paedagogica, Series altera.
91. Lindell, E., & Lundquist, B. (1978). Om fri skriving i skolan [On free writing in school] (Forskning om utbildning, Report No. 32. Stockholm, Sweden: Liber.
92. Marshall, S. (1978). Creative writing. London: Macmillan Education.
93. Martin, J. (1997). Analysing genre: Functional parameters. In F. Christie & J. Martin (Eds.), Genre and institutions. London: Cassell.
94. Martin, N., D'Arcy, P., Newton, B.,&Parker,R.(1979). Writing and learning across the curriculum. London: Ward Lock Educational.
95. Matre, S. (1997). Munnlege tekstar hos barn: Ein studie av barn 5-8 år i dialogisk samspel [Children's oral texts: Astudy of children ages 5-8 in conversational play]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
96. Maybury, B. (1976). Creative writing for juniors. London: B.T. Batsford.
97. Mehlum, A.(1982).Skapende ord: Kreativ skrivingigrunnskolen[Creative words: Creative writing in the elementary school]. Oslo, Norway: Landslaget for norskundervisning/Cappelen.
98. Miller, C. R. (1984). Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70, 151-167.
99. Miller, C. R. (1994). Genre as social action. In A. Freedman & P. Medway (Eds.), Genre and the new rhetoric. London: Taylor and Francis.
100. Moslet, I. (1983). Barn skriver [Children write]. InI. Breines, K. E. Eriksen,& S. Ongstad (Eds.), Fag og forskning [Disciplines and research]. Oslo, Norway: Universitetsforlaget.
101. Moslet, I., & Evensen, L. S. (1993). Skrivepedagogisk fornying [Innovation in writing pedagogy]. Oslo, Norway: Ad Notam/Gyldendal.
102. Næss, A. (1961). En del elementære logiske emner [Some basic logical topics]. Oslo, Norway: Universitetsforlaget. (Original work published 1940)
103. Ness, E. (Ed.). (1974). Pedagogisk oppslagsbok 1 og 2 [Pedagogical Encyclopedia 1 and 2]. Oslo, Norway: Gyldendal Norsk Forlag.
104. Nilsen,H. (2000).På leiting etter tekstens implisitte leser [Seeking the implicit reader ofthe text]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
105. Norwegian Research Council. (1981). Prosjektkatalog: Skoleforskning i humanistiske fag [Project Catalogue: School research within the humanities]. Oslo, Norway: Author.
106. Norwegian Research Council. (1982). Forskning for skolehverdagen: 726 lærere om skoleforskning: behov, formidling og deltakelse [Research for the everyday in schools: 726 teachers on school research: Needs, mediation and participation]. Oslo, Norway: Author.
107. Nöth, W. (1990). Handbook of semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
108. Nystrand, M., Greene, S., & Wiemelt, J. (1993). Where did composition studies come from? An intellectual history. Written Communication, 10, 267-333.
109. Ongstad,S. (1996a). Literacies and mother tongue education: The challenge of task ideologies in a semiotic-didactic perspective. In F. Christie & J. Foley (Eds.), Some contemporary themes in literacy research. New York: Waxmann.
110. Ongstad, S. (1996b). Sjangerdidaktisk kommentar til Prøysens "Stil om katten" [A didaktic comment on genre in Prøysen's "Stil om katten"]. In S. Ongstad (Ed.), Hva vil vi med sjangrene-og de med oss? [What do we want with genres-and they with us?] Oslo, Norway: Landslaget for norskundervisning/Cappelen Akademisk Forlag.
111. Ongstad, S. (1997). Sjanger, posisjonering og oppgaveideologier: Et teoretisk-empirisk bidrag til et tverrfaglig, semiotisk og didaktisk sjangerbegrep [Genre, positioning, and task ideologies: A theoretical-empirical contribution to an interdisciplinary, semiotic, and didaktic genre concept]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Trondheim, Norway.
112. Ongstad, S. (1999a). Sources of "didaktization": On defining disciplines and their "fag-didaktik" across borders illustrated with examples from mother tongue education (MTE). In B. Hudson, F. Buchberger, P. Kansanen, & H. Seel (Eds.), Didaktik/fachdidaktik as science(s) of the teaching profession? (Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 173-186). Umeå, Sweden: The Thematic Network on Teacher Education (TNTEE) Publications.
113. Ongstad, S. (1999b). Self-positioning(s) and students' task reflexivity-A semiotic macro concept exemplified. Journal of Structural Learning & Intelligent Systems, 14, 125-152.
114. Ongstad, S. (1999c). Vad är positioneringsanalys? "Självpositionering" i en (post)mod-ern skola som exempel [What is positoning analysis? "Self positioning" in a (post)modern school as example]. In C. A. Säfström & L. Östman (Eds.), Textanalys: En introduktion til syftesrelaterade analyser [Text analysis: An introduction to purpose related analyses]. Lund, Sweden: Studentlitteratur.
115. Ongstad, S. (2002). Genres-From static, closed, extrinsic, verbal dyads to dynamic, open, intrinsic, semiotic triads. In R. Coe, R. Lingard, & T. Teslenko (Eds.), The rhetoric and ideology of genre: Strategies for stability and change. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
116. Ongstad, S. (forthcoming). Bakhtin's triadic epistemology and ideologies of dialogism. Manuscript submitted for publication in 2002.
117. Persson, U.-B. (1974). Några aspekter på syntax och ordforråd i skolelevers skriftspråk [Some aspects of syntax and vocabulary in students' written language] (Läs-og skrivförmågan utveckling genom skolåren, LäSK. Report No. 1). Linköping, Sweden: Lärarhögskolan i Linköping.
118. Petterson, A. (1976). Skrivträning i gymnasieskolan: Genom språket til innholdet [Writing exercisesin high school: Through language to content] (Pedagogiske hjälpmedel nr. 21). Lund, Sweden: University of Lund.
119. Prosjekt skolestil (PROSKO). (1982). Forskning om skolestiler: En teoretisk gjennomgang av noen 70-årsprosjekter [Research on school stils: Atheoretical inquiry of projects from the 1970s]. Løvenstad, Norway: Author.
120. Prosjekt skolestil (PROSKO). (1983). Hva vil vi med skolestilen? [What do we want for the stil?] Løvenstad, Norway: Author.
121. Ribsskog, B. (1938). Karakterer og karaktergiving i folkeskolen [Marks and marking in primary school]. Oslo, Norway: Gyldendal.
122. The Royal Ministry of Education, Research and Church Affairs. (1999). The curriculum for the 10-year compulsory school in Norway. Oslo, Norway: National Centre for Educational Resources.
123. Ruge, H. (1933). Morsmålsundervisningen [Mother tongue education]. Oslo, Norway: Cappelens forlag.
124. De Saussure, F. (1959). Course in general linguistics. C.Bally & A. Sechehaye (Eds.)incol-laboration with A. Riedlinger. (W. Baskin, Trans.). London: Fontana. (Original work published 1916)
125. Schulstad, O. (1934). Eksperimentelle undersøkelser om rettskrivingsundervisning [Experimental studies of teaching and learning spelling]. Skola och samhälle, 15, 21-29.
126. Schwebs, T., & Otnes, H. (2001). Tekst. no. strukturer og sjangrer i digitale medier [Text. no. structures and genres in digital media]. Oslo, Norway: Landslaget for norskundervisning/Cappelen Akademisk Forlag.
127. Senter for lærerutdanning og skoletjeneste. (1988). Prosesskriving i klasserommet [Process writing in the classroom]. Oslo, Norway: Author.
128. Sjøberg, S. (1998). Naturfag som allmenndannelse [Natural science as general education]. Oslo, Norway: Ad Notam.
129. Skjong, S. (1988). Fortellingene slipper oss ikke [The stories will not let us go]. Hovedfag-thesis, Oslo University, Norway.
130. SKRIO/Senter for lærerutdanning og skoletjeneste. (1989a). Skoleskriving på alvor [School writing, seriously]. Oslo University: Author.
131. SKRIO/Senter for lærerutdanning og skoletjeneste. (1989b). Fagskriving [Disciplinary writing]. Oslo University: Author.
132. SKRIVE-PUFF. (1991). The DEVEL project (Developing written language). Norway: University of Trondheim.
133. Skrivingiskolen (1-4): Halvårsskrift for prosessorientert skrivepedagogikk [Writing inschool, 1-4: Half-yearly publication for process oriented writing pedagogy]. (1989-1991). Oslo, Norway: Landslaget for norskundervisning/Cappelen.
134. Smidt, J. (1989). Seks lesere på skolen-hva de søkte og hva de fant [Six readers at school: What they searched and what they found]. Oslo, Norway: Universitetsforlaget.
135. Smidt, J. (1993). Ny skriveforskning i Norge. En oversikt [New research on writing in Norway: An overview]. Oslo, Norway: Program for Utdanningsforskning, Norges Forskningsråd.
136. Smidt, J. (1997). Fornyelsens konflikter. Skriveopplæring i videregående skole [The conflicts of innovation: Writing pedagogy in upper secondary school]. Oslo, Norway: Landslaget for norskundervisning/Cappelen.
137. Smidt, J.(1999). "All the world is a stage"-Discourse roles and student positionings in the great dialogue. In O. Dysthe (Ed.), The dialogical perspective and Bakhtin. Conference report. Bergen, Norway: Program for Research on Learning and Instruction, University of Bergen.
138. Smidt, J. (2002). Double histories in multivocal classrooms: Notes toward an ecological account of writing. Written Communication, 19(3), 414-443.
139. Steiner, R. (1927). Truth, beauty, and goodness. London: Anthropological.
140. Steinfeld, T. (1986). På skriftens vilkår: Et bidrag til morsmålsfagets historie [In the terms of the script(ure): A contribution to the history of the mother tongue]. Oslo, Norway: Landslaget for norskundervisning/Cappelen.
141. Stenning, K. (1989). Methodical semanticism consideredas ahistory ofprogressincog-nitive science. In B. Hirst (Ed.), The making of cognitive science: Essays in honor of George A. Miller. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
142. Storstein, O. (1946). Fremtiden sitter på skolebenken [The future sits on the (school) desk]. Oslo, Norway: Tiden.
143. Sundet, O. (1943). Soga om morsmålsstilen ved studenteksamen [The story ("saga") of the mother tongue "stil" in graduation exams] Norsk pedagogisk tidsskrift, nos. 1-4, 4-18, 25-29, 55-58, 87-91.
144. Svortdal, K. (1964). Stilskriving og logikk [Stil writing and logic]. Oslo, Norway: Universitetsforlaget.
145. Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
146. Teleman, U. (1978). Om skrivträning i grundskola och på gymnasium [On writing instruction in elementary and high school]. Forskning om Utbildning, 2, 38-49.
147. Thori, J. (1952). Rettskriving: Lærestoff og resultater [Spelling: Syllabus and results]. Magister artium thesis, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
148. Togeby, O. (1979). "Men hva' med kongen." Sprogteori og sproganalyse ["But what about the king?" Language theory and language analysis]. Nydanske studier (NyS), 10/11, 26-103.
149. Trudgill, P. (1999). Norwegian as a normal language. In U. Røyneland (Ed.), Language contact and language conflict. Volda, Norway: Ivar Aasen Institute.
150. Tungland, H. (1984). Mange mener nok kanskje at det hadde vært en fordel om du hadde vært litt mindre påståelig: Om modalitet i skolestiler [Quite many, perhaps, might be of the opinion that it would have been an advantage if you had been a bit less obstinate: On modality in school stils]. Hovedfags thesis, Oslo University, Oslo, Norway.
151. Vagle, W. (1990). Radiospråket-talt eller skrevet? [Radio language-Spoken or written?]. Oslo, Norway: Novus.
152. van Langenhove, L., & Harré, R. (1993). Positioning and autobiography: Telling your life. In N. Coupland & J. Nussbaum (Eds.), Discourse and lifespan development. London: Sage.
153. Vejleskov, H. (1978). Om sprog og tænkning III [On language and thinking III]. Copenhagen, Denmark: Munksgaard.
154. Vološinov, V. N. (1973). Marxism and the philosophy of language. New York: Seminar.
155. Wallin. E. (1967). Spelling: Factorial and experimental studies. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden.
156. Westbury, I. (1998). Didaktik and curriculum studies. In B. Gundem & S. Hopmann (Eds.), Didaktik and/or curriculum: An international dialogue. New York: Peter Lang.
157. Wiggen, G. (1982). Rettskrivingsstudier I. Talemålskorrelative normavvik i grunnskoleelevers skriftlige arbeid: Norsk forskningsstatus 1981 [Studies in spelling I. Oral language-related norm deviationsin written worksofelementary school students: State ofthe art in Norwegian research, 1981]. Oslo, Norway: Novus.
158. Wilkinson, A., Barnsley, G., Hanna, P., & Swan, M. (1980). Assessing language development. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
159. Witte, S. (1992). Text, context, intertext: Towards a constructivist semiotics of writing. Written Communication, 9, 237-308.
160. Zwicky, A. (1984). Om textbinding i gode og dårlige skolestiler [On cohesion in good and bad school stils]. Hovedfag thesis, Oslo University, Oslo, Norway.