Predisposition to choose: The language of an information gap task in a multilingual primary classroom

Language Teaching Research

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 241-261

  Dufficy, Paul ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248708580     PISSN: 13621688     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1191/1362168804lr145oa     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Bloor, T. and Bloor, M. 1995: The functional analysis of English. London: Arnold.
2. Bygate, M. 1999: Task as context for the framing, reframing and unframing of language. System 27: 33-48.
3. Bygate, M., Skehan, P. and Swain, M. 2001: Researching pedagogic tasks. Harlow, UK: Longman.
4. Cummins, J. 1996: Negotiating identities: education for empowerment in a diversesociety. on tario, CA: California Association for Bilingual Education.
5. Derewianka, B. 1998: A grammar companion. Sydney: Primary English Teaching Association.
6. Ellis, R. 2003: Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7. Freebody, P., Ludwig, C. and Gunn, S. 1995: Everyday literacy practices in and out of schools in lowsocio-economic urban communities, Volume 2. Canberra: Department of Education, Employmentand Training in association with Griffith University and the Queensland Department of Education.
8. Gibbons, P. 2001: Learning a new register in a second language. In Candlin, C. and Mercer, N., editors, English language teaching in its social context, London: Routledge, 258-270.
9. Halliday, M. A. K. 1994: An introduction to functional grammar, secondedition. London: Edward Arnold.
10. Hardman, F., Smith, F. and Wall, K. 2003: ‘Interactive whole class teaching’ in the national Literacy Strategy. Cambridge Journal of Education 33: 197-215.
11. Hoetker, J. and Ahlbrand, Jr., W. P. 1969: The persistence of the recitation. American Educational Research Journal 6: 145-167.
12. Lock, G. 1996: Functional English grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. Mehan, H. 1979: Learning lessons: social organisation in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
14. Mercer, N. 1995: The guided construction of knowledge. Clevedon, OH: Multilingual Matters.
15. Mercer, N. 2000: Words and minds. London: Routledge.
16. Oliver, R. 2002: The patterns of negotiation for meaning in child interactions. The Modern Language Journal 86: 97-111.
17. Sinclair, J. McH. and Coulthard, R. M. 1975: Towards an analysis of discourse: the English used by teachersand pupils. London: Oxford University Press.
18. Storch, N. 2002: Patterns of interaction in ESL pair work. Language Learning 52: 119-158.
19. Swain, M. 1993: The output hypothesis: just speaking and writing aren’t enough. The Canadian Modern Language Review 50: 158-164.
20. Swain, M. 1995: Three functions of output in second languagelearning. In Cook, G. and Seidlhofer, B., editors, Principle and practice in applied linguistics, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 125-144.
21. Tharp, R. G. and Gallimore, R. 1991: The instructional conversation: teaching and learning insocial activity. Santa Cruz, CA: The National Center for Research on Cultural Diversity and Second Language Learning.
22. Toohey, K. 2000: Learning English at school: identity, social relations andclassroom practice. Clevedon, OH: Multilingual Matters.
23. van Lier, L. 1996: Interaction in the language curriculum: awareness, autonomyand authenticity. London: Longman.
24. van Lier, L. 2001: Constraints and resources in classroom talk: issues ofequality and symmetry. In Candlin, C. and Mercer, N., editors, English language teaching in its social context, London: Routledge, 90-107.
25. Watt, R. J. C. 2003: Concordance. Available at
26. Wells, G. 1999: Dialogic inquiry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27. Young, R. E. 1984: Teaching equals indoctrination: the dominant epistemic practices of our schools. British Journal of Educational Studies XXXII: 220-238.