Rhetorical enargeia and linguistic pragmatics: On speech-reporting strategies in east slavic medieval hagiography and homiletics

Journal of Historical Pragmatics

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 49-80

  Lunde, Ingunn ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BERGEN   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248706132     PISSN: 15665852     EISSN: 15699854     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1075/jhp.5.1.04lun     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Bakker, Egbert. 1998. Fiktionalität und Medienwechsel im Altgriechischen: Von Homer zu Thykidides. In: Christine Ehler and Ursula Schaefer (eds.). Verschriftung und Verschriftlichung. Aspekte des Medienwechsels in verschiedenen Kulturen und Epochen (ScriptOralia 94). Tübingen: Günter Narr, 57-77.
2. Bortnes, Jostein. 1988. Visions of Glory. Studies in Early Russian Hagiography (Slavica Norvegica 5). Oslo and New Jersey: Solum and Humanities Press International.
3. Carruthers, Mary J. 1998. The Craft of Thought. Meditation, Rhetoric, and the Making of Images, 400-1200 (Cambridge Studies in Medieval Literature). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Cerquiglini, Bernard. 1989. Éloge de la Variante. Histoire Critique de la Philologie. Paris: Seuil.
5. Clark, Herbert H., and Thomas B. Carlson. 1992. Hearers and speech acts. In: Herbert H. Clark. Arenas of Language Use. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
6. Collins, Daniel E. 1996. The pragmatics of indirect speech in Old Church Slavonic and other Early Slavic writings. Studies in Slavic and General Linguistics 23, 21-86.
7. Collins, Daniel E. 2001. Reanimated Voices. Speech Reporting in a Historical-Pragmatic Perspective (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 85). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
8. Eremin, I.P. 1989. Literaturnoe nasledie Kirilla Turovskogo. Arkheologicheskii obzor i izdanie tekstov (Monuments of Early Russian Literature). Berkeley, Calif.: Berkeley Slavic Specialties.
9. Felten, Joseph. (ed.). 1913. Nicolai Progymnasmata (Bibliotheca scriptorum Graecorum et Romanorum Teubneriana, Rhetores graeci 11). Leipzig: Teubner.
10. Fleischman, Suzanne. 1990. Tense and Narrativity From Medieval Performance to Modern Fiction (Croom Helm Romance Linguistics Series). Austin: University of Texas Press.
11. Fleischman, Suzanne. 1996. Medieval vernaculars and the myth of monoglossia: A conspiracy of linguistics and philology. In: Seth Lerer (ed.). Literary History and the Challenge of Philology. The Legacy of Erich Auerbach. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 92-104, notes 267-274.
12. Fleischman, Suzanne. 2000. Methodologies and ideologies in historical linguistics: On working with older languages. In: Susan C. Herring, Pieter van Reenen, and Lene Schosler (eds.). Textual Parameters in Older Languages (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 195). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 33-58.
13. Frank, Georgia. 2000. The pilgrim’s gaze in the age before icons. In: Robert S. Nelson (ed.). Visuality Before and Beyond the Renaissance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 98-115.
14. Franklin, Simon. 1991. Sermons and Rhetoric of Kievan Rus’. Translated and with an introduction by Simon Franklin (Harvard Library of Early Ukrainian Literature, English Translations 5). Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
15. Graf, Fritz. 1995. Ekphrasis: Die Entstehung der Gattung in der Antike. In: Gottfried Boehm and Helmut Pfotenhauer (eds.). Beschreibungskunst—Kunstbeschreibung. Ekphrasisvon der Antike bis zur Gegenwart. Munich: Fink.
16. Green, Dennis. 1994. Medieval Listening and Reading. The Primary Reception of German Literature 800-1300. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. Hollingsworth, Paul. 1992. The Hagiography of Kievan Rus’. Translated with an introduction by Paul Hollingsworth (Harvard Library of Early Ukrainian Literature, English Translations 2), Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
18. Jagic, Vatroslav. (ed.). 1883. Quattuor evangeliorum versionis palaeoslovenicae Codex Marianus glagoliticus, characteribus cyrillicis transcriptum. Berlin.
19. Kassel, Rudolf. (ed.). 1976. Aristotle. Ars rhetorica. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
20. Kennedy, George A. 1989. Hellenistic literary and philosophical scholarship. In: George A. Kennedy (ed.). The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism. Vol. 1: Classical Criticism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 200-219.
21. Kennedy, George A. 1991. Aristotle On Rhetoric. A Theory of Civic Discourse. Newly translated with Introduction, Notes, and Appendices by George A. Kennedy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22. Koschmal, Walter. 1992. Vom Dialog in der Epik zum epischen Dialog. Evolution der Redeformen in der russischen Literatur des 11. bis 18. Jahrhunderts (Wiener slawistischer Almanach, Sonderband 34). Vienna: Gesellschaft zur Förderung Slawistischer Studien.
23. Kot kov et al. (eds). 1971. Uspenskii sbornikXII—XIIIvv. Moscow: Nauka.
24. Leech, Geoffrey N. 1983. Principles of Pragmatics (Longman Linguistics Library 30). London: Longman.
25. Long, Anthony A. 1971. Aisthesis, prolepsis, and linguistic theory in Epicurus. Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 18, 114-133.
26. Longacre, Robert E. 1981. A spectrum and profile approach to discourse analysis. Text 1, 337-359.
27. Lunde, Ingunn. 2001. Verbal Celebrations. Kirill of Turov’s Homiletic Rhetoric and its Byzantine Sources (Slavistische Veröffentlichungen 86). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
28. Manieri, Alessandra. 1998. L’immaginepoetica nella teoria degli antichi. Phantasia ed enargeia (Filologia e critica 82). Pisa: Istituti editoriali e poligrafici internazionali.
29. Nelson, Robert S. 2000. To say and to see: Ekphrasis and vision in Byzantium. In: Robert S. Nelson (ed.). Visuality Before and Beyond the Renaissance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 143-168.
30. Rahn, Helmut (ed.). 1972. Marcus Fabius Quintilianus. Ausbildung des Redners. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 2 vols.
31. Patillon, Michel (ed.). 1997. Aelius Théon. Progymnasmata. Paris: Les belles lettres.
32. Rabe, Hugo (ed.). 1926. Aphthonii progymnasmata (Bibliotheca scriptorum Graecorum et Romanorum Teubneriana, Rhetores Graeci 10) Leipzig: Teubner.
33. Reid, James S. 1885. M. Tulli Ciceronis Academica. The text revised and explained by James S. Reid. London: Macmillan.
34. Russell, Donald A. (ed.). 1964. ‘Longinus’ On the Sublime. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
35. e Congrès des Romanistes Scandinaves (Helsinki 1984), Helsinki: Société Philologique, 342-352.
36. Sternberg, Meir. 1991. How indirect discourse means: Syntax, semantics, poetics, pragmatics. In: Roger D. Sell (ed.). Literary Pragmatics. London: Routledge, 62-93.
37. Sternberg, Meir. 1982. Proteus in quotation-land: Mimesis and the forms of reported discourse. Poetics Today 3 (2), 107-156.
38. Striker, Gisela. 1977. Epicurus on the truth of sense impressions. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 59, 125-142.
39. Tredennick, Hugh. 1947. Aristotle. The Metaphysics. With an English translation by Hugh Tredennick. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
40. Vinogradov, V.P. 1915. O kharaktere propovednicheskogo tvorchestva Kirilla, episkopa Turovskogo. V pamiat’ stoletiia (1814-1914) Imperatorskoi Moskovskoi dukhovnoi akademii: sbornik statei, vol. 2, Sergiev Posad: Tip. Sv.-Tr. Sergievoi Lavry, 313-395.
41. Voloshinov, V.N. [1929] 1973. Marxism and the Philosophy of Language. Translated by Ladislav Matejka and Irwin R. Titunik. New York: Seminar Press.
42. Webb, Ruth. 1997. Mémoire et imagination: Les limites de l’enargeia dans la théorie rhétorique grecque. In: Carlos Lévy, and Laurent Pernot (eds.). Dire l’évidence (Philosophie et rhétorique antiques). Paris: L’Harmattan, 229-248.
43. Webb, Ruth. 1999. Ekphrasis ancient and modern: The invention of a genre. Word & Image 15 (1), 7-18.
44. Webb, Ruth. 1999b. The aesthetics of sacred space: Narrative, metaphor, and motion in ekphraseis of church buildings. Dumbarton Oaks Papers 53, 59-74.
45. Zanker, Graham. 1981. Enargeia in the ancient criticism of poetry. Rheinisches Museum 124, 297-311.