Ekphrasis ancient and modern: The invention of a genre

Word and Image

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 7-18

  Webb, Ruth ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248754232     PISSN: 02666286     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02666286.1999.10443970     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Murray Krieger, Ekphrasis: The Illusion of the Natural Sign (Baltimore, 1991);
2. James A. W. Heffeman, Museum of Words: The Poetics of Ekphrasis from Homer to Ashbery (Chicago, 1993);
3. Grant F. Scott, The Sculpted Word: Keats, Ekphrasis, and the Visual Arts (Hanover, 1995);
4. Peter Wagner (ed.), Icons - Texts - Iconotexts: Essays on Ekphrasis and Intermediality (Berlin, 1996).
5. Jean Hagstrum, The Sister Arts: The Tradition of literary Pictorialism in English Poetry from Dyden to Gray (Chicago, 1958), p. 18, n. 34;
6. Philippe Hamon, La description littéraire: de Vantiquitê à Roland Barthes (Paris, 1991), p. 8
7. W. Steiner, The Colors of Rhetoric: Problems in the Relation Between Modem Literature and Painting (Chicago, 1982), p. 41
8. Stephen Bann, The True Vine: On Visual Representation and the Western Tradition (Cambridge, 1989), p. 28
9. Raymond A. Macdonald in a Review Essay of Kreiger, Ekphrasis, in Word & Image, (1993), pp. 81-6.
10. N. Land, The Viewer as Poet: The Renaissance Response to Art (University Park, 1994), p.xvi.
11. S. Rabau, ‘Narration et description: l’exigence de détails’, Lalies, vol xv (1995). PP- 273-89
12. George Kennedy, A New History of Classical Rhetoric (Princeton, 1994), p. 206
13. P. DuBois, History, Rhetorical Description and the Epic from Homer to Spenser (Cambridge, 1982), p. 4
14. Svetlana Alpers, ‘Ekphrasis and aesthetic attitudes in Vasari’s Lives’, Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes, vol xxm (1960), pp. 190-215
15. Patricia Rubin, Giorgio Vasari’ Art and History (New Haven and London, 1995), pp. 275-6.
16. Scott S, Sculpted Word
17. H. S. Boyd, Select Passages of the Writings of St Chrysostom, St Gregory Nazianzen, and St Basil (London, 1813)
18. P. Friedländer, Johannes von Gaza. und. Paulus Silentarius: Kunstbeschreibungen Justinianischer Jeit (Leipzig and Berlin, 1912).
19. Leo Spitzer, ‘The “Ode on a Grecian Urn,” or content vs. metagrammar’, in Essays on English and American Literature, ed. A. Hatcher (Princeton, 1962), pp. 67-97;
20. Hagstrum H, The Sister Arts
21. Glanville Downey, ‘Ekphrasis’, in Reallexikon fiir Antike und Christentum, vol. 4 (Stuttgart, 1959), pp. 921-44.
22. Spitzer S, ‘The “Ode on a Grecian Urn” p. 72.
23. W. T. J. Mitchell, Iconology: Image, Text, Ideology (Chicago, 1985), p. 99
24. Theon T, Progymnasmata, ed. M. Patillon (Paris, 1997), pp. 66-9
25. F. Graf, ‘Ekphrasis: Die Erstellung der Gattung in der Antike’ in Beschreibungskunst-Kunstbrescheibung, eds. G. Boehm and H. Pfotenhauer (Munich, 1995), PP- 143-55
26. R. Webb, ‘Imagination and the arousal of the emotions’, in The Passions in Roman Literature and Thought, eds. S. Braund and C. Gill (Cambridge, 1997), pp. 112-27;
27. M. Blanchard, ‘Problèmes du texte et du tableau: les limites de l’imitation à l’époque hellénistique et sous l’empire’, in Le Plaisir de parler: études de sophistique comparée, ed. B. Cassin (Paris, 1986), pp. 131-54.
28. Friedrich Matz, De Philostmtorum in describendis imaginibusfide (Bonn, 1867), p. 45.
29. E. Bertrand, Un Critique d’art dans l’antiquité: Philostrate et son école (Paris, 1881), PP-53-4
30. A. Bougot, Philostrate l’Ancien: une galène antique (Paris, 1881), p. 172.
31. H. Piot, Les procédés littéraires de la Second Sophistique chez Lucien: L’ecphrasis (Rennes, 1914), p. 22;
32. J. Bompaire, Lucien écrivain: imataüon et création (Paris, 1958), p. 707.
33. L. Spitzer, ‘Garcilaso, Third Eclogue, lines 265-271’, Hispanic Review xx (1952) p. 248
34. Peter Wagner, ‘Introduction: Ekphrasis, Iconotexts, and Intermediality - the State(s) of the Art(s)’, in Wagner (ed.), Icons - Texts - Iconotexts, pp. 1-40.
35. Philippe Hamon, Du descriptif (Paris, 1993)