Testing times: Research directions and issues for cambridge ESOL examinations

TESOL Quarterly

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 141-146

  Taylor, Lynda B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248705494     PISSN: 00398322     EISSN: 15457249     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/3588265     Document Type: Note

References (19)

1. Alderson, J. C., & Wall, D. (Eds.). (1996). Washback. Special issue, Language Testing, 13(3).
2. Association of Language Testers in Europe. (n.d.). Retrieved January 21, 2004, from http://www.ALTE.org
3. Brown, A. (2003). Legibility and the rating of second language writing: An investigation of the rating of hand-written and word-processed IELTS task two essays. IELTS Research Reports 2003, Vol. 4. Canberra, Australia: IELTS Australia Pty Ltd.
4. Canadian Language Benchmarks. (2000). Retrieved January 21, 2004, from http://www.language.ca
5. Cambridge ESOL On-line. (n.d.). Retrieved January 21, 2004, from http://www.CambridgeESOL.org
6. Cambridge University Press. (2004). Cambridge Learner Corpus. Retrieved January 21, 2004, from http://uk.cambridge.org/elt/corpus/clc.htm
7. Council of Europe. (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8. Council of Europe. (n.d.). Languages. Retrieved January 21, 2004, from http://www.coe.int/T/E/Cultural-Co-operation/education/Languages
9. Cheng, L., Watanabe, Y., & Curtis, A. (Eds.). (2004). Washback in language testing: Research contexts and methods. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10. Green, A. (1998). Verbal protocol analysis in language testing research: A handbook. Studies in Language Testing, Vol. 5. Cambridge: UCLES/Cambridge University Press.
11. Lazaraton, A. (2002). A qualitative approach to the validation of oral language tests. Studies in Language Testing, Vol. 14. Cambridge: UCLES/Cambridge University Press.
12. McNamara, T. (1996). Measuring second language performance. London: Longman.
13. Meiron, B., & Schick, L. (2000). Ratings, raters and test performance: An exploratory study. In A. J. Kunnan (Ed.), Fairness and validation in language assessment: Selected papers from the 19th Language Testing Research Colloquium, Orlando, Florida (pp. 153-176). Studies in Language Testing, Vol. 9. Cambridge: UCLES/Cambridge University Press.
14. Milanovic, M., & Saville, N. (Eds.). (1996). Performance testing, cognition and assessment: Selected papers from the 15th Language Testing Research Colloquium, Cambridge and Arnhem. Studies in Language Testing, Vol. 3. Cambridge: UCLES/Cambridge University Press.
15. Milanovic, M., Saville, N., & Shuhong, S. (1996). A study of the decision-making behaviour of composition markers. In M. Milanovic & N. Saville (Eds.), Performance testing, cognition and assessment: Selected papers from the 15th Language Testing Research Colloquium, Cambridge and Arnhem (pp. 92-114). Studies in Language Testing, Vol. 3. Cambridge: UCLES/Cambridge University Press.
16. Russell, M., & Hany, W. (1997). Testing with computers: An experiment comparing student performance on tests conducted via computer and via paper and pencil. Boston College: Education Policy Analysis Archives, Vol. 5, No. 3. Retrieved January 21, 2004, from http://www.epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v5n3.html
17. Saville, N., & Hawkey, R. (2004). The IELTS Impact Study: Investigating washback on teaching materials. In L. Cheng, Y. Watanabe, & A. Curtis (Eds.), Washback in language testing: Research contexts and methods (pp. 73-96). London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18. Scott, M. (1996). WordSmith Tools [Computer software]. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Retrieved January 21, 2004, from http://www.lexically.net/ wordsmith/index.html
19. Shohamy, E. (2001). The power of tests. London: Longman/Pearson.