Linguistic units in word typing: Effects of word presentation modes and typing delay

Written Language and Literacy

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 153-176

  Will, Udo ^a   Nottbusch, Guido ^b   Weingarten, Rüdiger ^b  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b BIELEFELD UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248696572     PISSN: 13876732     EISSN: 15706001     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1075/wll.9.1.10wil     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Askov, E., Otto, W., & Askov, W. 1970. A decade of research in handwriting: Progress and prospect. The Journal of Educational Research 69:86-98.
2. Baayen, R.H., Piepenbrock, R., & Gulikers, L. 1995. The CELEX lexical database [Computer Software]. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium.
3. Blanken, G. 1990. Formal paraphasias: A single case study. Brain and Language 38:534-554.
4. Bonin, P., Fayol, M., & Gombert, J.E. 1998. An experimental study oflexical access in the writing and naming of isolated words. International Journal of Psychology 33(4):269-286.
5. Bonin, P., Peereman, R., & Fayol, M. 2001. Do phonological codes constrain the selection of orthographic codes in written picture naming? Journal of Memory and Language 45:688-720.
6. Butterworth, B. 1989. Lexical access in speech production. In Lexical representation and processes, W. Marslen-Wilson (ed.), 108-135. Cambridge: MIT Press.
7. Butterworth, B. 1992. Disorders of phonological encoding. Cognition 42:261-286.
8. Caramazza, A., Costa, A., Miozzo, M., & Bi, Y. 2001. The specific-word frequency effect: Implications for the representation of homophones in speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 27:1430-1450.
9. Caramazza, A. & Miceli, G. 1990. The structure of graphemic representations. Cognition 37:243-297.
10. Caramazza, A., Miceli, G., Villa, G., & Romani, C. 1987. The role of the graphemic buffer in spelling: Evidence from a case of acquired dysgraphia. Cognition 26:59-85.
11. Carreiras, M., Alvarez, C., & de Vega, M. 1993. Syllable frequency and visual word recognition in Spanish. Journal of Memory and Language 32:766-780.
12. Dell, G.S. 1986. A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review 24:886-903.
13. Ellis, A.W. 1979. Slips of the pen. Visible Language 13:265-282.
14. Ellis, A.W. 1982. Spelling and writing (and reading and speaking). In Normality and pathology in cognitive functions, A.W. Ellis (ed.), 113-146. London: Academic Press.
15. Ellis, A.W. 1984. Spelling and writing. In Reading, writing and dyslexia: A cognitive analysis, A.W. Ellis (ed.), 60-85. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16. Ferrand, L., Segui, J., & Grainger, J. 1996. Masked priming of words and picture naming: The role of syllabic units. Journal of Memory and Language 35:708-723.
17. Fodor, J.A. 1983. Modularity of mind. Cambridge: MIT Press.
18. Garrett, M.F. 1975. The analysis of sentence production. In The psychology of learning and memory, G.H. Bower (ed.), Vol. 9:133-177. New York: Academic Press.
19. Gentner, D.R. 1983. Keystroke timing in transcription typing. In Cognitive aspects of skilled typewriting, W.E. Cooper (ed.), 95-120. New York: Springer.
20. Gentner, D.R., Larochelle, S., & Grudin, J. 1988. Lexical, sublexical, and peripheral effects in skilled typewriting. Cognitive Psychology 20:524-548.
21. Genzel, S., Kerkhoff, G., & Scheffter, S. 1995. PC-gestutzte Standardisierung des Bildmaterials von Snodgrass & Vanderwart (1980). Neurolinguistik 9(1):41-53.
22. Graham, S. & Weintraub, N. 1996. A review of handwriting research: Progress and prospects from 1980 to 1994. Educational Psychology Review 8(1):7-87.
23. Hulstijn, W. & van Galen, G.P. 1983. Programming in handwriting: Reaction time and movement time as a function of sequence length. Acta Psychologica 54:23-49.
24. Jacobs, A.M. & Grainger, J. 1994. Models of visual word recognition — Sampling the state of the art. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 20:1311-1334.
25. Jescheniak, J.D. & Levelt, W.J.M. 1994. Word frequency effects in speech production: Retrieval of syntactic information and of phonological form. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Language, Memory and Cognition 20:824-843.
26. Larochelle, S. 1983. A comparison of skilled and novice performance in discontinuous typing. In Cognitive aspects of skilled typewriting, W.E. Cooper (ed.), 67-94. New York: Springer.
27. Levelt, W.J.M. 1989. Speaking: from intention to articulation. Cambridge: MIT Press.
28. Levelt, W.J.M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. 1999. A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22:1-73.
29. MacKay, D.G. 1987. The organization of perception and action. New York: Springer.
30. Margolin, D.I. 1984. The neuropsychology of writing and spelling: Semantic, phonological, motor, and perceptual processes. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 36A:459-489.
31. Marini, V. & Blanken, G. 1996. Orthographie ohne Phonologie: Ein Fall von Tiefenagraphie bei neologistischer Jargon-Aphasie. Neurolinguistik 10(2):83-107.
32. McCloskey, M., Badecker, W., Goodman-Schulman, R.A., & Aliminosa, D. 1994. The structure of graphemic representation in spelling: Evidence from a case of acquired dys-graphia. Cognitive Neuropsychology 11:341-392.
33. Mehler, J., Dommergues, J.Y., Frauenfelder, U., & Segui, J. 1981. The syllable’s role in speech segmentation. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 22:298-305.
34. Miceli, G., Benvegnü, B., Capasso, R., & Caramazza, A. 1997. The independence of phonological and orthographic lexical forms: Evidence from aphasia. Cognitive Neuropsychology 14(1):35-69.
35. Monsell, S. 1984. Components of working memory underlying verbal skills: A “distributed capacities” view — A tutorial review. In Attention and Performance X: Control of language processes, H. Bouma & D.G. Bouwhuis (eds.), 327-350. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
36. Morton, J. 1980. The logogen model and orthographic structure. In Cognitive processes in spelling, U. Frith (ed.), 117-133. London: Academic Press.
37. Nottbusch, G., Grimm, A., Weingarten, R., & Will, U. 2005. Syllabic structures in typing: Evidence from deaf writers. Reading and Writing 18:497-526.
38. Nottbusch, G., Weingarten, R., & Sahel, S. 2006. From written word to written sentence production. In Writing and Cognition, D. Galbraith, L. van Waes, & M. Torrance (eds.). Amsterdam: Elsevier. (in press).
39. Nottbusch, G., Weingarten, R., & Will, U. 1998. Schreiben mit der Hand und Schreiben mit dem Computer. OBST (Osnabrücker Beiträge zur Sprachtheorie) 56:11-27.
40. Ostry, D.J. 1980. Execution-time movement control. In Tutorials in motor behaviour, G.E. Stelmach & J. Requin (eds.), 457-468. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
41. Ostry, D.J. 1983. Determinants of interkey times in typing. In Cognitive aspects of skilled typewriting, W.E. Cooper (ed.), 225-246. New York: Springer.
42. Peck, M., Askov, E.N., & Fairchild, S.H. 1980. Another decade of research in handwriting: Progress and prospect in the 1970s. The Journal of Educational Research 73:283-298.
43. Posner, M.I., & Carr, T.H. 1992. Lexical access and the brain: Anatomical constraints on cognitive models of word recognition. American Journal of Psychology 105:1-26.
44. Pynte, J., Courrieu, P., & Frenck, C. 1991. Evidence of repeated access to immediate verbal memory during handwriting. European Journal of Psychology of Education VI(2):121-125.
45. Rapp, B., Benzing, L., & Caramazza, A. 1997. The autonomy of lexical orthography. Cognitive Neuropsychology 14(1):71-104.
46. Santiago, J., MacKay, D.G., Palma, A., & Rho, C. 2000. Sequential activation processes in producing words and syllables: Evidence from picture naming. Language and Cognitive Processes 15(1):1-44.
47. Sevald, C.A., Dell, G.S., & Cole, J.S. 1995. Syllable structure in speech production: Are syllables chunks or schemas? Journal of Memory and Language 34:807-820.
48. Shaffer, L.H. 1978. Timing in the motor programming of typing. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 30:333-345.
49. Snodgrass, J.G. & Vanderwart, M. 1980. A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 6(2):174-215.
50. Sternberg, S., Monsell, S., Knoll, R.L., & Wright, C.E. 1978. Latency and duration of rapid movement sequences: Comparison of speech and typewriting. In Information processing in motor control and learning, G.E. Stelmach (ed.), 117-152. New York: Academic Press.
51. van Galen, G.P. 1991. Handwriting: Issues for a psychomotor theory. Human Movement Science 10:165-191.
52. van Galen, G.P., Smyth, M.M., Meulenbroek, R.G., & Hylkema, H. 1989. The role of shortterm memory and the motor buffer in handwriting under visual and non-visual guidance. In Computer recognition and human production of handwriting, R. Plamondon, C.Y. Suen, & M.L. Simner, (eds.), 253-271. Singapore: World Scientific Publ.
53. van Galen, G.P. & Teulings, H.L. 1983. The independent monitoring of form and scale factors in handwriting. Acta Psychologica 54:9-22.
54. Viviani, P. & Laissard, G. 1996. Motor Templates in Typing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 22(2):417-445.
55. Weingarten, R., Nottbusch, G., & Will, U. 2004. Morphemes, syllables and graphemes in written word production. In Language production, T. Pechmann & C. Habel (eds.), 529-572. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
56. Will, U., Weingarten, R., Nottbusch, G., & Albes, C. 2004. Linguistische Rahmen und segmentale Information bei der Einzelwortschreibung. In Sprachproduktion, C. Habel & T. Pechmann (eds.). Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.
57. Zorzi, M., Houghton, G., & Butterworth, B. 1998. Two routes in reading aloud? A connectionist dual-process model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 24(4):1131-1161.