The challenges of the Ontario Secondary School Literacy Test for second language students

Language Testing

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 185-208

  Cheng, Liying ^a   Klinger, Don A ^a   Zheng, Ying ^a  

^a QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248682156     PISSN: 02655322     EISSN: 14770946     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0265532207076363     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Abedi, J. 2004: The No Child Left Behind Act and English language learners: Assessment and accountability issues. Educational Researcher 33(1): 4-14.
2. Abedi, J., Leon, S. and Mirocha, J. 2003: Impact of students' language background on content-based assessment: Analyses of extant data (CSE. Tech. Rep. No. 603). Los Angeles: University of California, National Centre for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Students Testing.
3. Anderson, N.J., Bachman, L.F., Perkins, K. and Cohen, A. 1991: An exploratory study into the construct validity of a reading comprehension test: Triangulation of the data sources. Language Testing 8: 41-66.
4. Bachman, L.F. 1990: Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5. Bachman, L.F. and Palmer, A.S. 1982: The construct validation of some components of communicative proficiency. TESOL Quarterly 16: 449-65.
6. Bailey, A.L. and Butler, F.A. 2004: Ethical considerations in the assessment of the language and content knowledge of U.S. school-age English learners. Language Assessment Quarterly 1(2-3): 177-93.
7. Bennett, R.E., Rock, D. and Wang, M. 1991: Equivalence of free-response and multiple choice items. Journal of Educational Measurement 28: 77-92.
8. Blackett, K. 2002: Ontario schools losing English as a second language programs - despite increase in immigration. Retrieved on 28 July 2004 from http://www.peopleforeducation.com/releases/2003/ oct24_02.html.
9. Carrell, P.L. 1983: Three components of background knowledge in reading comprehension. Language Learning 33: 183-203.
10. Carrell, P.L. and Wallace, B. 1983: Background knowledge: Context and familiarity in reading comprehension. Paper presented at the annual convention of teachers of English to speakers of other languages, Honolulu, HI. (ERIC document reproduction service No. ED228901).
11. Catterall, J.S. 1989: Standards and school dropouts: A national study of tests required for high school graduation. American Journal of Education 98(1): 1-35.
12. Chan, C.C., Tsui, M.S., Chan, M.Y. and Hong, J.H. 2002: Applying the structure of the observed learning outcomes (SOLO) taxonomy on student's learning outcomes: an empirical study. Assessment and Education in Higher Education 27: 511-27.
13. Cheng, L. and Gao, L. 2002: Passage dependence in standardized reading comprehension: Exploring the College English Test. Asian Journal of English Language Teaching 12: 161-78.
14. Christian, D., Saunders, B., Genesee, F., Lindholm-Leary, K. and Goldenberg, C. 2005: Educating English language learners: A synthesis of research evidence. Symposium presented at the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
15. Connor-Linton, J. 1995a: Looking behind the curtain: What do L2 composition ratings really mean? TESOL Quarterly 29: 762-65.
16. Connor-Linton, J. 1995b: Crosscultural comparison of writing standards: American ESL and Japanese EFL. World Englishes 14(1): 99-115.
17. Cumming, A., Hart, D., Corson, D., Labrie, N. and Cummins, J. 1993: Provisions and demands for ESL, ESD, and ALF education in Ontario schools. Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education. Report submitted to the Ontario Ministry of Education and Training.
18. Cummins, J. 1982: Tests, achievement, and bilingual students. Arlington, VA: National Clearinghouse for Bilingual Education.
19. Cummins, J. 1996: Negotiating identities: Education for empowerment in a diverse society. Los Angeles, CA: California Association for Bilingual Education.
20. Education Quality and Accountability Office 2002: Ontario Secondary School Literacy Test, February 2002: Report of Provincial Results. Retrieved 6 February 2003 from http://www.eqao.com/pdf_e/ 02/02P026e.pdf
21. Education Quality and Accountability Office 2004: Ontario Secondary School Literacy Test, October 2003: Report of Provincial Results. Retrieved 20 January 2005 from http://www.eqao.com/pdf_e/ 04/04P002e.pdf
22. Emmitt, M., Pollock, J. and Komesaroff, L. 2003: Language and learning, third edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23. Freedle, R. and Kostin, I. 1993: The prediction of TOEFL reading item difficulty: Implications for construct validity. Language Testing 10: 133-70.
24. Gee, J.P. 2003: Opportunity to learn: A language-based perspective on assessment. Assessment in Education 10: 27-46.
25. Hamp-Lyons, L. 1996: The challenges of second language writing assessment. In White, E., Lutz, W., and Kamusikiri, S., editors, Assessment of writing: Policies, politics, practice. New York: Modern Language Association, 226-40.
26. Hancock, G.R. 1994: Cognitive complexity and the comparability of multiple-choice and constructed-response test formats. Journal of Experimental Education 62: 143-57.
27. Huberty, C.J. 1994: Applied discriminant analysis. New York: Wiley.
28. Hulstijn, J.H. and Laufer, B. 2001: Some empirical evidence for the involvement load hypothesis in vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning 51: 539-58.
29. Jennings, M., Fox, J., Graves, B. and Shohamy, E. 1999: The test-takers' choice: An investigation of the effect of topic on language test performance. Language Testing 16(4): 426-56.
30. Katz, S., Lautenschlager, G., Blackburn, A. and Harris, F. 1990: Answering reading comprehension items without passages on the SAT. Psychological Science 1: 122-27.
31. Kobayashi, H. and Rinnert, C. 1996: Factors affecting composition evaluation in an EFL context: Cultural rhetorical pattern and readers' background. Language Learning 46: 397-437.
32. Kobayashi, M. 2002: Method effects on reading comprehension test performance: Text organization and response format. Language Testing 19: 193-220.
33. Kossan, P. 2004: Ariz easing fed's rules for school standards. Arizona Republic, 4 April, p. B1.
34. Lee, G. 2002: The influence of several factors on reliability for complex reading comprehension tests. Journal of Educational Measurement 39: 149-64.
35. Madaus, G. and Clarke, M. 2001: The impact of high-stakes testing on minority students. In Kornhaber, M. and Orfield G., editors, Raising standards or raising barriers: Inequality and high stakes testing in public education, New York: Century Foundation, 85-106.
36. Mazzeo, C. 2001: Frameworks of state: Assessment policy in historical perspective. Teachers College Record 103: 367-97.
37. Mehan, H. 1997: Contextual factors surrounding Hispanic dropouts. Retrieved on 16 January 2004 from http://www.ncela.gwu.edu/ pubs/hdp/1/
38. Meyer, B.J.F. 1985: Prose analysis: Purpose, procedures, and problems: Parts I and II. In Britton, B. and Black, J.B., editors, Understanding expository text. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 269-304.
39. Mueller, T.G., Singer, G.H.S. and Grace E.J. 2004: The individuals with disabilities education act and California's Proposition 227: Implications for English language learners with special needs. Bilingual Research Journal 28(2): 231-51.
40. No Child Left Behind Act 2002: Pub. L. No. 107-10.
41. Norrid-Lacey, B. and Spencer, D.A. 1999: Dreams I wanted to be reality: Experience of Hispanic immigrant students at an urban high school. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.
42. Ontario Ministry of Education and Training. 1999: The Ontario Curriculum Grade 9 to 12 English as a Second Language and English Literacy Development. Toronto: Queen's Printer for Ontario.
43. Peretz, A.S. and Shoham, M. 1990: Testing reading comprehension in LSP: Does topic familiarity affect assessed difficulty and actual performance? Reading in a Foreign Language 7: 447-55.
44. Perkins, K. 1992: The effect of passage and topical structure types on ESL reading comprehension difficulty. Language Testing 9: 163-72.
45. Proposition 203, English for the Children, Arizona voter initiative. 2000.
46. Proposition 227, English for the Children, California voter initiative. 1998.
47. Pulido, D. 2004: The relationship between text comprehension and second language incidental vocabulary acquisition: a matter of topic familiarity? Language Learning 54(3): 469-523.
48. Qian, D.D. and Schedl, M. 2004: Evaluation of an in-depth vocabulary knowledge measure for assessing reading comprehension. Language Testing 21(1): 28-53.
49. Question 2, English Language Education in Public Schools, Massachusetts voter initiative 2002.
50. Read, J. 2000: Assessing vocabulary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
51. Read, J. 2004: Research in teaching vocabulary. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 24: 146-61.
52. Reardon, S.F. and Galindo, C. 2002: Do high-stakes tests affect student's decisions to drop out of school? Evidence from NELS. Retrieved on 28 December 2003 from http://www.pop.psu.edu/general/pubs/ working_papers/psu-pri/wp0301.pdf
53. Riley, S. and Lee, J.F. 1996: A comparison of recall and summary protocols as measures of second language reading comprehension. Language Testing 13(2): 173-90.
54. Roessingh, H. 1999: Adjunct support for high school ESL learners in mainstream English classes: Ensuring success. TESL Canada Journal 17(1): 72-85.
55. Royer, J. 1990: The sentence verification technique: A new direction in the assessment of reading comprehension. In Legg, S. and Algina, J., editors, Cognitive assessment of language and math outcomes. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 145-91.
56. Shepard, L. 1991: When does assessment and diagnosis turn into sorting and segregation? In Hiebert, E., editor, Literacy for a diverse society: Perspectives, practices, and policies. New York: Teacher College Press, 279-98.
57. Shohamy, E. 1983: The stability of oral proficiency assessment on the oral interview testing procedure. Language Learning 33: 527-40.
58. Shohamy, E. 1984: Does the testing method make a difference? The case of reading comprehension. Language Testing 1: 147-70.
59. Shohamy, E. 1997: Testing methods, testing consequences: Are they ethical? Are they fair? Language Testing 14(3): 340-49.
60. Silva, T. 1997: On the ethical treatment of ESL writers. TESOL Quarterly 21(2): 359-63.
61. Tabachnick, B.G. and Fidell, L.S. 1989: Using multivariate statistics. New York: Harper Collins.
62. Taylor, A.R. and Tubianasa, T. 2001: Student Assessment in Canada: Improving the learning environment through effective evaluation. Society for the Advancement of Excellence in Education: Kelowna, BC.
63. Watt, D. and Roessingh, H. 1994: ESL drop-out: The myth of educational equity. The Alberta Journal of Educational Research 40(3): 283-96.
64. Watt, D. and Roessingh, H. 2001: The dynamics of ESL drop-out: Plus ça change. The Canadian Modern Language Review 58: 203-22.
65. Wright, W.E. 2005: English language learners left behind in Arizona: The nullification of accommodations in the intersection of federal and state policies. Bilingual Research Journal 29(1): 1-29.