The prevalence of abdominal obesity in Slovakia. The IDEA Slovakia study;Prevalencia abdominálnej obezity na Slovensku. Štúdia IDEA Slovakia

Vnitrni Lekarstvi

Volumn 53, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 326-330

  Dukát, Andrej ^a   Lietava, J ^a   Krahulec, B ^a   Caprnda M ^a   Vacula, I ^a   Sirotiakova J ^b   Kosmalova V ^a   Minarik P ^b  

^a Lekárskej Fakulty UK a FNsP Bratislava ^*  (Slovakia)

^b The Philosopher University in Nitra Geoinformatics and Regional Development   (Slovakia)

Author keywords

Cardiovascular risk; Epidemiology; Metabolic syndrome; Obesity

Indexed keywords

LOW DENSITY LIPOPROTEIN CHOLESTEROL;

ABDOMINAL OBESITY; ADULT; ARTICLE; BODY WEIGHT; CARDIOVASCULAR RISK; CHOLESTEROL BLOOD LEVEL; COMORBIDITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIABETES MELLITUS; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYPERLIPOPROTEINEMIA; HYPERTENSION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; METABOLIC SYNDROME X; PREVALENCE; SLOVAKIA; WAIST CIRCUMFERENCE; ABDOMINAL FAT; AGED; CLINICAL TRIAL; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; OBESITY;

ABDOMINAL FAT; ADULT; AGED; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBESITY; PREVALENCE; SLOVAKIA;

EID: 34248664429     PISSN: 0042773X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Svačina Š, Owen K. Obezita, diabetes 2. typu a jejich kvantitativní vztahy. Vnitř Lék 2002; 48: 500-506.
2. Kahn HR, Buse J, Ferrani E. The metabolic syndrome: time for a critical appraisal: Joint statement from the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes. Diabetes Care 2005; 28: 289-304.
3. The International Diabetes Federation: The IDF consensus worldwide definition of the metabolic syndrome. 2005, 1-7.Info@idf.org.
4. Hu G, Qiao Q, Tuomilehto J et al. Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome and its relation to all cause and cardiovascular mortality in nondiabetic European men and women. Arch Intern Med 2004; 164: 1066-1076.
5. Lakka HM, Laaksonen DE, Lakka TA et al. The metabolic syndrome and total and cardiovascular disease mortality in middle aged men. JAMA 2002; 288: 2709-2716.
6. National Institutes of Health. The Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). Executive summary, Bethesda, National Institutes of Health, National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute 2001. NIH Publ No 01-3670.
7. Albert MA, Glynn RJ, Buring J et al. Impact of Traditional and Novel Risk Factors on the Relationship Between Socioeconomic Status and Incident Cardiovascular Events. Circulation 2006; 114: 2619-2826.
8. Pickering TG. Cardiovascular pathways: socioeconomic status and stress effects on hypertension and cardiovascular function. Ann NY Acad Sci 1999; 896: 267-277.
9. Lynch JW, Kaplan GA, Cohen RD et al. Do cardiovascular risk factors explain the relation between socioeconomic status, risk for all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality and acute myocardial infarction? AmJ Epidemiol 1966; 144: 934-942.
10. Dukát A, Lietava J, Krahulec B et al. IDEA - prvé výsledky o prevalencii abdominálnej obezity na Slovensku. Via Pract 2006; 3: 554-557.
11. Čaprnda M, Lietava J, Fodor JG. Metabolic syndrome and its association with cardiovascular diseases in Slovakia. Cor Vasa 2004; 46: 12-13.
12. Ben Yahia R, Lichnovská R, Janušová L et al. Zdravé osoby versus pacienti s diagnózou diabetes mellitus 2.typu - vybrané parametry v séru a v subkutánní abdominální tukové tkáni. Vnitř Lék 2007; 53: 9-17.
13. Haluzík M. Metabolický syndrom a tuková tkáň: opravdu za všechno mohou adipocyty? Editorial. Vnitř Lék 2007; 53: 5-6.
14. Ford ES, Giles WH, Detry WH. Prevalence of the Metabolic syndrome among US Adults. JAMA 2002; 287: 356-359.
15. Greenland P. Critical questions about the metabolic syndrome. Circulation 2005; 112: 3675-3676.
16. Fodor JG, Frohlich JJ, Genest JJ jr et al. Report of the Working Group on Hypercholesterolemia and Other Dyslipidemias. Can Med Assn J 2000; 162: 1441-1447
17. Joint British Societies Guidelines on Prevention of Cardiovascular Diseases in Clinical Practice. Heart 2005; 91(Suppl 5): 1-52.