Regional seismic song differences in sky island populations of the jumping spider Habronattus pugillis Griswold (araneae, salticidae)

Journal of Arachnology

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 545-556

  Elias, Damian O ^a,b   Hebets, Eileen A ^c   Hoy, Ronald R ^d   Maddison, Wayne P ^b   Mason, Andrew C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA   (United States)

^d Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

Author keywords

Salticidae; Seismic communication; Signal evolution; Species diversification

Indexed keywords

ARANEAE; HABRONATTUS PUGILLUS; SALTICIDAE;

EID: 34248649355     PISSN: 01618202     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1636/S05-77.1     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. Andersson, M. 1994. Sexual Selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey. 599 pp.
2. Blest, A.D., R.C. Hardie, P. McIntyre & D.S. Williams. 1981. The spectral sensitivities of identified receptors and the function of retinal tiering in the principal eyes of a jumping spider. Journal of Comparative Physiology 145:227-239.
3. Bradbury, J.W. & S.L. Vehrencamp. 1998. Principles of Animal Communication. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts. 882 pp.
4. Brown, D.E. & C.H. Lowe. 1982. Biotic Communities of the Southwest. U.S. Forest Service General Technical Report RM-78. Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experimental Station, Fort Collins, Colorado.
5. Candolin, U. 2003. The use of multiple cues in mate choice. Biological Reviews 78:575-595.
6. Clark, D.L. & C.L. Morjan. 2001. Attracting female attention: the evolution of dimorphic courtship displays in the jumping spider Maevia inclemens (Araneae: Salticidae). Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 268:2461-2465.
7. Clark, D.L. & G.W. Uetz. 1990. Video image recognition by the jumping spider, Maevia inclemens (Araneae: Salticidae). Animal Behaviour 40:884-890.
8. Clark, D. L. & G. W. Uetz. 1992. Morph-independent mate selection in a dimorphic jumping spider: demonstration of movement bias in female choice using video-controlled courtship behavior. Animal Behaviour 43:247-254.
9. Clark, D.L. & G.W. Uetz. 1993. Signal efficacy and the evolution of male dimorphism in the jumping spider, Maevia inclemens. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 90:11954-11957.
10. Cokl, A., J. Presern, M. Virant-Doberlet, G.J. Bagwell & J.G. Millar. 2004. Vibratory signals of the harlequin bug and their transmission through plants. Physiological Entomology 29:372-380.
11. Cokl, A., M. Zorovic, A. Zunic & M. Virant-Doberlet. 2005. Tuning of host plants with vibratory songs of Nezara viridula L (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae). Journal of Experimental Biology 208: 1481-1488.
12. Crane, J. 1949. Comparative biology of salticid spiders at Rancho Grande, Venezuela. Part IV: an analysis of display. Zoologica 34:159-214.
13. Cutler, B. 1988. Courtship Behavior in Habronattus captiosus (Araneae, Salticidae). Great Lakes Entomologist 21:129-131.
14. DeVoe, R.D. 1975. Ultraviolet and green recepetors in principle eyes of jumping spiders. Journal of General Physiology 66:193-207.
15. Eakin, R.M. & J.L. Brandenburger. 1971. Fine structure of the eyes of jumping spiders. Journal of Ultrastructure Research 37:618-663.
16. Edwards, G.B. 1981. Sound production by courting males of Phidippus mystaceus (Araneae: Salticidae). Psyche 88:199-214.
17. Edwards, G.B. & R.R. Jackson. 1994. The role of experience in the development of predatory behaviour in Phidippus regius, a jumping spider (Araneae, Salticidae) from Florida. New Zealand Journal of Zoology 21:269-277.
18. Elias, D.O., E.A. Hebets & R.R. Hoy. 2006a. Female preference for complex/novel signals in a spider. Behavioral Ecology 17:765-771.
19. Elias, D.O., E.A. Hebets, R.R. Hoy & A.C. Mason. 2005. Seismic signals are crucial for male mating success in a visual specialist jumping spider (Araneae: Salticidae). Animal Behaviour 69:931-938.
20. Elias, D.O., B.R. Land, A.C. Mason & R.R. Hoy. 2006b. Measuring and quantifying dynamic visual signals in jumping spiders. Journal of Comparative Physiology A: Neuroethology, Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology 192:785-797.
21. Elias, D.O., N. Lee, E.A. Hebets & A.C. Mason. 2006c. Seismic signal production in a wolf spider: parallel versus serial multi-component signals. Journal of Experimental Biology 209: 1074-1084.
22. Elias, D.O., A.C. Mason & R.R. Hoy. 2004. The effect of substrate on the efficacy of seismic courtship signal transmission in the jumping spider Habronattus dossenus (Araneae: Salticidae). Journal of Experimental Biology 207:4105-4110.
23. Elias, D.O., A.C. Mason, W.P. Maddison & R.R. Hoy. 2003. Seismic signals in a courting male jumping spider (Araneae: Salticidae). Journal of Experimental Biology 206:4029-4039.
24. Forster, L. 1982a. Vision and prey-catching strategies in jumping spiders. American Scientist 70: 165-175.
25. Forster, L. 1982b. Visual communication in jumping spiders (Salticidae). Pp. 161-212. In Spider Communication: Mechanisms and Ecological Significance (P.N. Witt & J.S. Rovner, eds.). Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
26. Gerhardt, H.C. & F. Huber, 2002. Acoustic Communication in Insects and Anurans: Common Problems and Diverse Solutions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois. 531 pp.
27. Griswold, C.E. 1987. A revision of the jumping spider genus Habronattus F.O. P.-Cambridge (Araneae: Salticidae) with phenetic and cladistic analyses. University of California Publications in Entomology 107:1-344.
28. Gwynne, D.T. & I.R. Dadour. 1985. A new mechanism of sound production by courting male jumping spiders (Araneae: Salticidae, Saitis michaelseni Simon). Zoological Society of London 207:35-42.
29. Harland, D.P. & R.R. Jackson. 2000. Cues by which Portia fimbriata, an araneophagic jumping spider, distinguishes jumping-spider prey from other prey. Journal of Experimental Biology 203: 3485-3494.
30. Harland, D.P. & R.R. Jackson. 2001. Prey classification by Portia fimbriata, a salticid spider that specializes at preying on other salticids: species that elicit cryptic stalking. Journal of Zoology 255:445-460.
31. Harland, D.P. & R.R. Jackson. 2002. Influence of cues from the anterior medial eyes of virtual prey on Portia fimbriata, an araneophagic jumping spider. Journal of Experimental Biology 205: 1861-1868.
32. Harland, D.P., R.R. Jackson & A.M. Macnab. 1999. Distances at which jumping spiders (Araneae: Salticidae) distinguish between prey and conspecific rivals. Journal of Zoology 247:357-364.
33. Hebets, E.A. & W.P. Maddison. 2005. Xenophilic mating preferences among populations of the jumping spider Habronattus pugillis Griswold. Behavioral Ecology 16:981-988.
34. Hebets, E.A. & D.R. Papaj. 2005. Complex signal function: developing a framework of testable hypotheses. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 57:197-214.
35. Hill, D.E. 1979. Orientation by jumping spiders of the genus Phiddipus (Araneae: Salticidae) during the pursuit of prey. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 5:301-322.
36. Hoefler, C.D. & E.M. Jakob. 2006. Jumping spiders in space: movement patterns, nest site fidelity and the use of beacons. Animal Behaviour 71: 109-116.
37. Holland, B. & W.R. Rice. 1998. Perspective: Chase-away sexual selection: antagonistic seduction versus resistance. Evolution 52:1-7.
38. Honey, R.C. & G. Hall. 1989. Attenuation of latent inhibition after compound pre-exposure: associative and perceptual explanations. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 41B:335-368.
39. Jackson, R.R. 1977. Courtship versatility in the jumping spider, Phidippus johnsoni (Araneae: Salticidae). Animal Behaviour 25:953-957.
40. Jackson, R.R. 1982. The behavior of communicating in jumping spiders (Salticidae). Pp. 213-247. In Spider Communication: Mechanisms and Ecological Significance (P.N. Witt & J.S. Rovner, eds.). Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
41. Jackson, R.R., X.J. Nelson & G.O. Sune. 2005. A spider that feeds indirectly on vertebrate blood by choosing female mosquitoes as prey. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 102:15155-15160.
42. Jackson, R.R. & S.D. Pollard. 1996. Predatory behavior of jumping spiders. Annual Review of Entomology 41:287-308.
43. Kotiaho, J.S., R.V. Alatalo, J. Mappes, M.G. Nielsen, S. Parri & A. Rivero. 1998. Energetic costs of size and sexual signalling in a wolf spider. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 265:2203-2209.
44. Krebs, J.R. & D.E. Kroodsma. 1980. Repertoires and geographical variation in bird song. Advances in the Study of Behavior 11:143-177.
45. Land, M.F. 1969a. Movements of retinae of jumping spiders (Salticidae: Dendryphantinae) in response to visual stimuli. Journal of Experimental Biology 51:471-493.
46. Land, M.E 1969b. Structure of retinae of principal eyes of jumping spiders (Salticidae: Dendryphantinae) in relation to visual optics. Journal of Experimental Biology 51:443-470.
47. Land, M.F. 1985. The morphology and optics of spider eyes. Pp. 53-78. In Neurobiology of Arachnids (F.G. Barth, ed.). Springer-Verlag, New York.
48. Land, M.F. & D.-E. Nilsson. 2002. Animal Eyes. Oxford University Press, New York. 221 pp.
49. Li, D. & M.L.M. Lim. 2005. Ultraviolet cues affect the foraging behaviour of jumping spiders. Animal Behaviour 70:771-776.
50. Maddison, W. & M. Hedin. 2003. Phylogeny of Habranattus jumping spiders (Araneae: Salticidae), with consideration of genital and courtship evolution. Systematic Entomology 28:1-21.
51. Maddison, W. & M. McMahon. 2000. Divergence and reticulation among montane populations of a jumping spider (Habronattus pugillis Griswold). Systematic Biology 49:400-421.
52. Maddison, W.P. & G.E. Stratton. 1988a. A common method of sound production by courting male jumping spiders (Araneae, Salticidae). Journal of Arachnology 16:267-269.
53. Maddison, W.P. & G.E. Stratton. 1988b. Sound production and associated morphology in male jumping spiders of the Habronattus agilis species group (Araneae, Salticidae). Journal of Arachnology 16:199-211.
54. Magal, C., M. Scholler, J. Tautz & J. Casas. 2000. The role of leaf structure in vibration propagation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 108:2412-2418.
55. Masta, S.E. 2000. Phylogeography of the jumping spider Habronattus pugillis (Araneae: Salticidae): recent vicariance of sky island populations? Evolution 54:1699-1711.
56. Masta, S.E. & W.P. Maddison. 2002. Sexual selection driving diversification in jumping spiders. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 99:4442-4447.
57. Michelsen, A. 1978. Sound reception in different environments. Pp. 345-373. In Sensory Ecology: Review and Perspectives. (M.A. Ali, ed.). Plenum Press, New York.
58. Michelsen, A., F. Fink, M. Gogala & D. Traue. 1982. Plants as transmission channels for insect vibrational songs. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 11:269-281.
59. Michelsen, A. & O.N. Larsen. 1983. Strategies for acoustic communication in complex environments. Pp. 321-331. In Neuroethology and Behavioral Physiology (F. Huber & H. Markl, eds.). Springer-Verlag, New York.
60. Nakamura, T. & S. Yamashita. 2000. Learning and discrimination of colored papers in jumping spiders (Araneae, Salticidae). Journal of Comparative Physiology A: Neuroethology, Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology 186:897-901.
61. Nelson, X.J. & R.R. Jackson. 2006. Compound mimicry and trading predators by the males of sexually dimorphic Batesian mimics. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 273:367-372.
62. Nelson, X.J., R.R. Jackson & G. Sune. 2005. Use of Anopheles specific prey capture behavior by the small juveniles of Evarcha culicivora, a mosquito-eating jumping spider. Journal of Arachnology 33:541-548.
63. Noordam, A.P. 2002. Abdominal percussion and ventral scutum in male Euophrys frontalis (Araneae: Salticidae). Entomologische Berichten, Amsterdam 62:17-19.
64. Parri, S., R.V. Alatalo, J.S. Kotiaho, J. Mappes & A. Rivero. 2002. Sexual selection in the wolf spider Hygrolycosa rubrofasciata: female preference for drum duration and pulse rate. Behavioral Ecology 13:615-621.
65. Partan, S.R. & P. Marler. 1999. Communication goes multimodal. Science 283:1272-1273.
66. Partan, S.R. & P. Marler. 2005. Issues in the classification of multimodal communicalion signals. American Naturalist 166:231-245.
67. Peckham, G.W. & E.G. Peckham. 1889. Observations on sexual selection in spiders of the family Attidae. Occasional Papers of the Wisconsin Natural History Society 1:3-60.
68. Peckham, G.W. & E.G. Peckham. 1890. Additional observations on sexual selection in spiders of the family Attidae, with some remarks on Mr. Wallace's theory of sexual ornamentation. Occasional Papers of the Wisconsin Natural History Society 1:117-151.
69. Richman, D.B. 1982. Epigamic display in jumping spiders (Araneae, Salticidae) and its use in systematics. Journal of Arachnology 10:47-67.
70. Römer, H. 1998. The sensory ecology of acoustic communication in insects. Pp. 63-97. In Comparative Hearing: Insects (R. R. Hoy, A. N. Popper R. R. Fay, eds.). Springer-Verlag, New York.
71. Rowe, C. 1999. Receiver psychology and the evolution of multicomponent signals. Animal Behaviour 58:921-931.
72. Su, K.F.Y. & D. Li. 2006. Female-biased predation risk and its differential effect on the male and female courtship behaviour of jumping spiders. Animal Behaviour 71:531-537.
73. Tarsitano, M.S. & R.R. Jackson. 1992. Influence of prey movement on the performance of simple detours by jumping spiders. Behaviour 123:106-120.
74. Tarsitano, M.S. & R.R. Jackson. 1994. Jumping spiders make predatory detours requiring movement away from prey. Behaviour 131:65-73.
75. Tarsitano, M.S. & R.R. Jackson. 1997. Araneophagic jumping spiders discriminate between detour routes that do and do not lead to prey. Animal Behaviour 53:257-266.
76. Taylor, P.W., O. Hasson & D.L. Clark. 2000. Body postures and patterns as amplifiers of physical condition. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 267:917-922.
77. Taylor, P.W., O. Hasson & D.L. Clark. 2001. Initiation and resolution of jumping spider contests: roles for size, proximity, and early detection of rivals. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 50: 403-413.
78. Uetz, G.W. & J.A. Roberts. 2002. Multisensory cues and multimodal communication in spiders: Insights form video/audio playback studies. Brain Behavior and Evolution 59:222-230.
79. Warshall, P. 1995. The Madrean sky island archipelago: a planetary overview. Pp. 6-18. In Biodiversity and Management of the Madrean Archipelago: the Sky Islands of the Southwestern United States and Northwestern Mexico (L.F. DeBano, P.F. Ffolliott, A. Ortega-Rubio, G.J. Gottfried, R.H. Hamre & C.B. Edminster, eds.). Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Fort Collins, Colorado.
80. Williams, D.S. & P. McIntyre. 1980. The principal eyes of a jumping spider have a telephoto component. Nature 288:578-580.