Xenophilic mating preferences among populations of the jumping spider Habronattus pugillis Griswold

Behavioral Ecology

Volumn 16, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 981-988

  Hebets, Eileen A ^a,b   Maddison, Wayne P ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Antagonistic coevolution; Attention; Diversification; Jumping spiders; Sexual selection; Speciation

Indexed keywords

COURTSHIP; MATE CHOICE; ORNAMENTATION; SEXUAL SELECTION; SPIDER;

ARANEAE; HABRONATTUS PUGILLUS; SALTICIDAE;

EID: 26444613408     PISSN: 10452249     EISSN: 14657279     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/ari079     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Andres JA, Arnqvist G, 2001. Genetic divergence of the seminal signal-receptor system in houseflies: the footprints of sexually antagonistic coevolution? Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 268:399-405.
2. Barraclough TG, Harvey PH, Nee S, 1995. Sexual selection and taxonomic diversity in passerine birds. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 259:211-215.
3. Basolo AL, 1990. Female preference predates the evolution of the sword in swordtail fish. Science 250:808-810.
4. Basolo AL, 1996. The phylogenetic distribution of a female preference. Syst Biol 45:290-307.
5. Basolo AL, 1998. Evolutionary change in a receiver bias: a comparison of female preference functions. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 265:2223-2228.
6. Bordenstein SR, Drapeau MD, Werren JH, 2000. Intraspecific variation in sexual isolation in the jewel wasp Nasonia. Evolution 54:567-573.
7. Cocroft RB, Ryan MJ, 1995. Patterns of advertisement call evolution in toads and chorus frogs. Anim Behav 49:283-303.
8. Cutler BE, 1988. Courtship behaviour in Habronattus captiosus (Araneae: Salticidae). Gt Lakes Entomol 21:129-131.
9. Dobzhansky T, Steisinger G, 1944. Experiments on sexual isolation in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 30:340-355.
10. Dombrovsky Y, Perrin N, 1994. On adaptive search and optimal stopping in sequential mate choice. Am Nat 144:355-361.
11. Elias DO, Mason AC, Maddison WP, Hoy RR, 2003. Seismic signals in a courting male jumping spider (Araneae: Salticidae). J Exp Biol 206:4029-4039.
12. Endler JA, Houde AE, 1995. Geographic-variation in female preferences for male traits in Poecilia reticulata. Evolution 49:456-468.
13. Gray DA, Cade WH, 2000. Sexual selection and speciation in field crickets. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:14449-14454.
14. Griswold C, 1977. Biosystematics of Habronattus in California. Berkeley, California: University of California.
15. Griswold C, 1987. A revision of the jumping spider genus Habronattus F.O.P. Cambridge (Araneae: Salticidae) with phenetic and cladistic analyses. Univ Calif Publ Entomol 107:1-344.
16. Hamilton WJ, Poulin R, 1999. Female preference and male nuptial colouration in the freshwater fish Gobiomorphus breviceps: geographic variation among populations. Can J Zool 77:463-469.
17. Hebets EA, 2005. Attention-altering interaction in the multimodal courtship display of the wolf spider Schizocosa uetzi. Behav Ecol 16:75-82.
18. Hebets EA, Uetz GW, 1999. Female responses to isolated signals from multimodal male courtship displays in the wolf spider genus Schizocosa (Araneae: Lycosidae). Anim Behav 57:865-872.
19. Hebets EA, Uetz GW, 2000. Leg ornamentation and the efficacy of courtship display in four species of wolf spider (Araneae: Lycosidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 47:280-286.
20. Hill GE, 1994. Geographic-variation in male ornamentation and female mate preference in the house finch - a comparative test of models of sexual selection. Behav Ecol 5:64-73.
21. Houde AE, Endler JA, 1990. Correlated evolution of female mating preferences and male color patterns in the Guppy Poecilia reticulata. Science 248:1405-1408.
22. Iliadi K, Iliadi N, Rashkovetsky E, Minkov I, Nevo E, Korol A, 2001. Sexual and reproductive behaviour of Drosophila melanogaster from a microclimatically interslope differentiated population of 'Evolution Canyon' (Mount Carmel, Israel). Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 268:2365-2374.
23. Janetos AC, 1980. Strategies of female mate choice - a theoretical analysis. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 7:107-112.
24. Jennions MD, Petrie M, 1997. Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: a review of causes and consequences. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 72:283-327.
25. Jones IL, Hunter FM, 1998. Heterospecific mating preferences for a feather ornament in least auklets. Behav Ecol 9:187-192.
26. Kirkpatrick M, Ravigne V, 2002. Speciation by natural and sexual selection: models and experiments. Am Nat 159:S22-S35.
27. Kobayashi A, Hiroki M, Kato Y, 2001. Sexual isolation between two sympatric types of the butterfly Eurema hecabe (L.). J Insect Behav 14:353-362.
28. Korol A, Rashkovetsky E, Iliadi K, Michalak P, Ronin Y, Nevo E, 2000. Nonrandom mating in Drosophila melanogaster laboratory populations derived from closely adjacent ecologically contrasting slopes at "Evolution Canyon." Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:12637-12642.
29. Kwiatkowski MA, Sullivan BK, 2002. Geographic variation in sexual selection among populations of an iguanid lizard, Sauromalus obesus (=ater). Evolution 56:2039-2051.
30. Maddison W, Hedin M, 2003. Phylogeny of Habronattus jumping spiders (Araneae: Salticidae), with consideration of genital and courtship evolution. Syst Entomol 28:1-21.
31. Maddison W, McMahon M, 2000. Divergence and reticulation among montane populations of a jumping spider (Habronattus pugillis Griswold). Syst Biol 49:400-421.
32. Maddison WP, Stratton GE, 1988. Sound production and associated morphology in male jumping spiders of the Habronattus agilis species group (Araneae, Salticidae). J Arachnol 16:199-211.
33. Masta SE, 2000. Phylogeography of the jumping spider Habronattus pugillis (Araneae: Salticidae): recent vicariance of sky island populations? Evolution 54:1699-1711.
34. Masta SE, Maddison WP, 2002. Sexual selection driving diversification in jumping spiders. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:4442-4447.
35. McClintock WJ, Uetz GW, 1996. Female choice and pre-existing bias: visual cues during courtship in two Schizocosa wolf spiders (Araneae: Lycosidae). Anim Behav 52:167-181.
36. McPhail JD, 1969. Predation and evolution of a stickleback (Gasterosteus). J Fish Res Board Can 26:3183-3208.
37. Mendelson TC, Shaw KL, 2005. Sexual behaviour: rapid speciation in an arthropod. Nature 433:375-376.
38. Mitra S, Landel H, PruettJones S, 1996. Species richness covaries with mating system in birds. Auk 113:544-551.
39. Morrow EH, Pitcher TE, Arnqvist G, 2003. No evidence that sexual selection is an 'engine of speciation' in birds. Ecol Lett 6:228-234.
40. Parker GA, Partridge L, 1998. Sexual conflict and speciation. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 353:261-274.
41. Peckham G, Peckham E, 1889. Observations on sexual selection in spiders of the family Attidae. Occas Pap Wis Nat Hist Soc 1:3-60.
42. Peckham G, Peckham E, 1890. Additional observations on sexual selection in spiders of the family Attidae, with some remarks on Mr. Wallace's theory of sexual ornamentation. Occas Pap Wis Nat Hist Soc 1:117-151.
43. Pizzari T, Snook RR, 2003. Perspective: sexual conflict and sexual selection: chasing away paradigm shifts. Evolution 57:1223-1236.
44. Pomiankowski A, Iwasa Y, 1998. Runaway ornament diversity caused by Fisherian sexual selection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:5106-5111.
45. Proctor HC, 1992. Sensory exploitation and the evolution of male mating-behavior - a cladistic test using water mites (Acari, Parasitengona). Anim Behav 44:745-752.
46. Prum RO, 1997. Phylogenetic tests of alternative intersexual selection mechanisms: trait macroevolution in a polygynous clade (Aves: Pipridae). Am Nat 149:668-692.
47. Ptacek MB, 1998. Interspecific mate choice in sailfin and shortfin species of mollies. Anim Behav 56:1145-1154.
48. Richman DB, 1977. Comparative studies on the mating behaviour and morphology of some species of Pellenes (Araneae-Salticidae). Tucson, Arizona: University of Arizona.
49. Richman DB, 1982. Epigamic display in jumping spiders (Araneae, Salticidae) and its use in systematics. J Arachnol 10:47-67.
50. Rowe L, Cameron E, Day T, 2003. Detecting sexually antagonistic coevolution with population crosses. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 270:2009-2016.
51. Ryan MJ, 1991. Sexual selection and communication in frogs. Trends Ecol Evol 6:351-355.
52. Ryan MJ, Fox JH, Wilczynski W, Rand AS, 1990. Sexual selection for sensory exploitation in the frog Physalaemus pustulosus. Nature 343:66-67.
53. Ryan MJ, Rand AS, 1993. Sexual selection and signal evolution - the ghost of biases past. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 340:187-195.
54. Ryan MJ, Wagner WE, 1987. Asymmetries in mating preferences between species - female swordtails prefer heterospecific males. Science 236:595-597.
55. Seehausen O, 2002. Patterns in fish radiation are compatible with Pleistocene desiccation of Lake Victoria and 14 600 year history for its cichlid species flock. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 269:491-497.
56. Shapiro LH, 2001. Asymmetric assortative mating between two hybridizing Orchelimum katydids (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae). Am Midl Nat 145:423-427.
57. Simmons LW, Zuk M, Rotenberry JT, 2001. Geographic variation in female preference functions and male songs of the field cricket Teleogryllus oceanicus. Evolution 55:1386-1394.
58. Wade MJ, Chang NW, McNaughton M, 1995. Incipient speciation in the flour beetle, Tribolium confusum - premating isolation between natural-populations. Heredity 75:453-459.
59. Wu CI, Hollocher H, Begun DJ, Aquadro CF, Xu YJ, Wu ML, 1995. Sexual isolation in Drosophila melanogaster - a possible case of incipient speciation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:2519-2523.