The Re-positioning of oracy: A millennium project?

Cambridge Journal of Education

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 11-23

  Haworth, Avril ^a  

^a MANCHESTER METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248633650     PISSN: 0305764X     EISSN: 14693577     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03057640125280     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. BARNES, D., 1988. “ The politics of oracy ”. In Oracy Matters, Edited by: MACLURE, M., PHILLIPS, T., and WILKINSON, A., Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
2. BARNES, D., BRITTEN, J., and ROSEN, H., 1969. Language, the Learner and the School, Harmondsworth: Penguin.
3. BEARNE, E., ed. 1999. Use of Language Across the Secondary Curriculum, London: Routledge.
4. CAZDEN, C., 1988. Classroom Discourse: the language of teaching and learning, Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
5. COX, B., 1995. Cox on the Battle for the English Curriculum, London: Hodder & Stoughton.
6. DADDS, M., 1999. Teachers' values and the Literacy Hour. Cambridge Journal of Education, 29: 7–19.
7. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AND SCIENCE. 1975. A Language for Life, The Bullock Report, London: HMSO.
8. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AND SCIENCE. 1989. English for Ages 5 to 16, London: HMSO.
9. DEPARTMENT FOR EDUCATION. 1993. English for Ages 5 to 16, London: HMSO.
10. DEPARTMENT FOR EDUCATION. 1995. English in the National Curriculum, London: HMSO.
11. DEPARTMENT FOR EDUCATION AND EMPLOYMENT. 1997a. Teaching: high status, high standards. Requirements for courses in initial teacher training, London: HMSO. Circular 10/97
12. DEPARTMENT FOR EDUCATION AND EMPLOYMENT. 1997b. The Implementation of the National Literacy Strategy, Report of the Literacy Task Force, London: HMSO.
13. DEPARTMENT FOR EDUCATION AND EMPLOYMENT. 1998. The National Literacy Strategy: framework for teaching, London: HMSO.
14. EDWARDS, D., and MERCER, N., 1987. Common Knowledge: the development of understanding in the classroom, London: Methuen.
15. FISHER, E., 1996. Identifying effective educational talk. Language and Education, 10: 237–253.
16. GARRATT, D., and ROBINSON, J., 1994. Opportunities missed or deliberately avoided: the invisibility of the cross-curricular themes in Bearing. The British Journal of Curriculum and Assessment, 4(3): 13–17.
17. GOLBY, M., 1994. After Bearing: a critical review of the Bearing Report (Review Article). The Curriculum Journal, 5(1): 95–105.
18. HAWORTH, A., 1999. Bakhtin in the classroom: what constitutes a dialogic text? Some lessons from small group interaction. Language and Education, 13(2): 99–117.
19. HOLQUIST, M., EMERSON, C., and HOLQUIST, M., eds. 1981. The Dialogic Imagination: four essays by M.M. Bakhtin, Austin: University of Texas Press.
20. HUGHES, M., and WESTGATE, D., 1998. Possible enabling strategies in teacher-led talk with young pupils. Language and Education, 12(3): 174–191.
21. JONES, P., 1988. Lipservice: the story of talk in our schools, Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
22. LAWTON, D., 1996. Beyond the National Curriculum: teacher professionalism and empowerment, London: Hodder & Stoughton.
23. LEWIS, M., and WRAY, D., 1999. Literacy in the Secondary School, London: David Fulton.
24. MACLURE, M., 1994. “ The rise of oracy in the UK ”. In Language, Literacy and Learning in Educational Practice, Edited by: STIERER, B., and MAYBIN, J., Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
25. MACLURE, M., PHILLIPS, T., and WILKINSON, A., eds. 1988. Oracy Matters, Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
26. NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE TEACHING OF ENGLISH. 1998. The National Literacy Strategy. NATE Magazine, Spring
27. NATIONAL CURRICULUM COUNCIL. 1992. National Curriculum English: the case for revising the order, York: NCC.
28. NICHOLSON, H., 1999. “ Talking in class: spoken language and effective learning ”. In Use of Language in the Secondary Curriculum, Edited by: BEARNE, E., London: Routledge.
29. NORMAN, K., ed. 1992. Thinking Voices: the work of the National Oracy Project, London: Hodder & Stoughton.
30. TAYLOR, T., 1995. Movers and shakers: high politics and the origins of the National Curriculum. The Curriculum Journal, 6(2): 161–184.
31. WEGERIF, R., and MERCER, N., 1996. Computers and reasoning through talk in the classroom. Language and Education, 10(1): 47–64.
32. WELLS, G., 1987. The Meaning Makers: children learning language and using language to learn, London: Hodder & Stoughton.
33. WELLS, G., 1992. “ The centrality of talk in education ”. In Thinking Voices: the work of the National Oracy Project, Edited by: NORMAN, K., London: Hodder & Stoughton.
34. WERTSCH, J.V., 1991. Voices in the Mind: a sociocultural approach to mediated action, Hemel Hempstead: Harvester-Wheatsheaf.
35. WESTGATE, D., and HUGHES, M., 1997. Identifying 'quality' in classroom talk: an enduring research task. Language and Education, 11(2): 125–139.