Field Instruction and the Mature Student

Journal of Teaching in Social Work

Volumn 24, Issue 3-4, 2004, Pages 113-129

  Fox, Raymond ^a  

^a FORDHAM UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Contracting; Field instruction; Learning styles; Mature students; Parallel process

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248605669     PISSN: 08841233     EISSN: 15407349     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J067v24n03_08     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Bogo, M., & Vayda, E. (1998). The practice of field instruction in social work: Theory and process. 2nd Ed. NY: Columbia University Press.
2. Doehrman, M. (1976). Parallel process in field instruction. Topeka, KS: The Menninger Clinic.
3. Fortune, A. E. (1980). Multiple roles, stress, and well-being among MSW students. Journal of Social Work Education, Fall 1987 (3), pp. 81-90.
4. Fox, R. (1983). Contracting in field instruction: A goal oriented process, The Clinical Supervisor, 1 (1), Spring, 37-49.
5. Fox, R. (1998). –An Essay on Mutuality & Parallel Process in Field Instruction, — The Clinical Supervisor, 17 (2), 59-73.
6. Fox, R. (1989), and Pauline Zischka, –The Field Instruction Contract: A Paradigm for Effective Learning, — Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 3 (1), 103-116.
7. Fox, R. (1987). –Learning Styles: Their Relevance to Clinical Supervision, — The Clinical Supervisor, 5 (3), 65-77.
8. Fox, R. & Gutheil, I. (2000). –Process Recording: A Means for Conceptualizing & Evaluating Practice, — Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 20 (1/2), 39-55.
9. Fox, R. (1989). –Relationship: The Cornerstone of Clinical Supervision, — Social Casework, 70 (3), March, 146-152.
10. Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. NY. Seabury.
11. Gregorc, A. F. (1979). Learning/teaching styles: Potent forces behind them. Educational Leadership, 36, 234-236.
12. Kadushin, A. (1992). Supervision in socialwork, 3rd ed. NY: Columbia University Press.
13. Knowles, M. (1988). The modern practice of adult education: From pedagogy to andragogy. New and Revised Edition. Englewood Cliffs: Cambridge.
14. Knowles, M. (1984). Andragogy in action: Applying modern principles of adult learning. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
15. Marshack, E. F. (1991). The older student: Social work's new majority. In Field Education in social work: Contemporary issues and trends. Ed. D. Schneck, B. Brossman, & U. Glassman. Dubuque: Kendall/Hunt.
16. Memmott, J., & Brennan, E. M. (1998). Learner-learning evnironment fit: An adult learning model for social work education. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 16 (1/2), 75-98.
17. Newman, B. K. (1999). Career change for those over 40: Critical issues and insights. Career Development Quarterly, 44 (1), 64-68.
18. Rose, S. (1999). Educating adult learners for child welfare practice: Wisconsin experience with title IV-E. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 18 (1/2), 169-183.
19. Schon, D. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
20. Schon, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. London: Temple Smith. Statistics on social work education in the United States: 2000. Alexandria, VA: Council on Social Work Education.
21. Towle, C. (1964). The learner in education for the professions as seen in education for social work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22. Valentine, T., & Darkenwald, G. G. (1990). Deterrents to participation in adult education: Profiles of potential learners. Adult Education Quarterly, 41 (1), 29-42.
23. Witkin, H. A. (1977). Cognitive styles in the educational setting. New York University Education Quarterly, 8 (3), 14-20.