Bat flight generates complex aerodynamic tracks

Science

Volumn 316, Issue 5826, 2007, Pages 894-897

  Hedenstrom A ^a   Johansson, L C ^a   Wolf, M ^a   Von Busse, R ^b   Winter, Y ^b,c,e   Spedding, G R ^d  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^c MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR ORNITHOLOGY   (Germany)

^d University of Southern California ^*  (United States)

^e BIELEFELD UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AERODYNAMICS; BAT; FLIGHT ACTIVITY; FUNCTIONAL ROLE; MODELING; MOMENTUM TRANSFER; WING;

ARTICLE; BAT; FLIGHT; FORELIMB; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VELOCITY;

AIR; ANIMALS; BIOMECHANICS; CHIROPTERA; FLIGHT, ANIMAL; MOVEMENT; RHEOLOGY; WING;

ANIMALIA; AVES;

EID: 34248587767     PISSN: 00368075     EISSN: 10959203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1126/science.1142281     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. 3.
2. S. M. Swartz, M. S. Groves, H. D. Kim, W. R. Walsh, J. Zool. 239, 357 (1996).
3. N. V. Kokshaysky, Nature 279, 146 (1979).
4. G. R. Spedding, J. M. V. Rayner, C. J. Pennycuick, J. Exp. Biol. 111, 81 (1984).
5. G. R. Spedding, J. Exp. Biol. 125, 287 (1986).
6. J. M. V. Rayner, G. Jones, A. Thomas, Nature 321, 162 (1986).
7. G. R. Spedding, J. Exp. Biol. 127, 59 (1987).
8. G. R. Spedding, M. Rosen, A. Hedenstrom, J. Exp. Biol. 206, 2313 (2003).
9. D. R. Warrick, B. W. Tobalske, D. R. Powers, Nature 435, 1094 (2005).
10. A. Hedenstrōm, M. Rosen, G. R. Spedding, J. R. Soc. Interface 3, 263 (2006).
11. L. Prandtl, O. G. Tietjens, Fundamentals of Hydro- and Aeromechanics (Dover, New York, 1957).
12. L. Prandtl, O. G. Tietjens, Applied Hydro- and Aeromechanics (Dover, New York, 1957).
13. M. Rosen, G. R. Spedding, A. Hedenstrom, J. R. Soc. Interface, 10.1098/rsif.2007.0215 (2007).
14. U. M. Norberg, J. Exp. Biol. 65, 179 (1976).
15. U. M. Norberg, J. Exp. Biol. 65, 459 (1976).
16. H. D. J. N. Aldridge, J. Exp. Biol. 126, 479 (1986).
17. H. D. J. N. Aldridge, J. Exp. Biol. 130, 275 (1987).
18. O. Von Helversen, in Bot Flight, Biona Report 5, W. Nachtigall, Ed. (Gustav Fischer, Stuttgart, Germany, 1986), pp. 107-128.
19. U. M. Lindhe Norberg, Y. Winter, J. Exp. Biol. 209, 3887 (2006).
20. See supporting material on Science Online.
21. 2/S (where b is wing span and S is wing area) is a measure of the wing shape. A high AR indicates a relatively long and slender wing, whereas a small AR signals a short and broad wing.
22. St = fA/U, where f is wingbeat frequency, A is tip-to-tip amplitude of the wingbeat, and U is flight speed relative to the air. St measures the relative magnitudes of wingtip and forward flight speed and can be interpreted as an indicator of the relative unsteadiness and efficiency of the vortex generation. In this study, St = 0.27 at U = 6.5 m/s, 0.37 at 4 m/s, and 0.81 at 1.5 m/s.
23. Y. Winter, J. Exp. Biol. 202, 1917 (1999).
24. E. V. Laitone, Exp. Fluids 23, 405 (1997).
25. L = 2.1, which is still considerably larger than 1.6. Furthermore, a truly local force coefficient would be based on the small local wing strip area and would be much higher.
26. G. K. Taylor, R. L. Nudds, A. L. R. Thomas, Nature 425, 707 (2003).
27. S. M. Swartz, K. Bishop, M.-F. Aguirre, in Functional and Evolutionary Ecology of Bats, A. Zubaid, G. F. McCracken, T. H. Kunz, Eds. (Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 2006), pp. 110-130.
28. Y. Lian, W. Shyy, J. Aircraft 42, 865 (200S).
29. We thank T. Alerstam for his support and comments on the manuscript. This work was supported by grants from the Swedish Research Council, the Swedish Foundation for International Cooperation in Research and Higher Education, the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation, the Crafoord Foundation, the Magnus Bergvall Foundation, the Royal Physiographical Society in Lund, and the Volkswagen Stiftung.