An assessment of water reserve changes in Salt Lake, Turkey, through multi-temporal landsat imagery and real-time ground surveys

Hydrological Processes

Volumn 21, Issue 11, 2007, Pages 1424-1435

  Ormeci, Cankut ^a   Ekercin, Semih ^b  

^a ISTANBUL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b AKSARAY UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Field spectroradiometer; Landsat; Radiometric correction; Remote sensing; Salt Lake, Turkey

Indexed keywords

CORRELATION METHODS; DROUGHT; LAKES; RADIOMETERS; REMOTE SENSING; SATELLITE IMAGERY; WATER SUPPLY;

FIELD SPECTRORADIOMETER; LANDSAT IMAGERY; UNCONTROLLED WATER USAGE; WATER RESERVE;

WATER MANAGEMENT;

CORRELATION METHODS; DROUGHT; LAKES; RADIOMETERS; REMOTE SENSING; SATELLITE IMAGERY; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER SUPPLY;

CORRELATION; LAKE WATER; LANDSAT THEMATIC MAPPER; RADIOMETER; REAL TIME; REMOTE SENSING; SATELLITE DATA;

EURASIA; TURKEY;

EID: 34248571641     PISSN: 08856087     EISSN: 10991085     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.6355     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Almeida-Filho R, Shimabukuro YE. 2002. Digital processing of a Landsat-TM time series for mapping and monitoring degraded areas caused by independent gold miners, Roraima State, Brazilian Amazon. Remote Sensing of Environment 79: 42-50.
2. Arnott SE, Yan ND. 2002. The influence of drought and re-acidification on zooplankton emergence from resting stages. Ecological Applications 12: 138-153.
3. Bilge F, Yazici B, Dogeroglu T, Ayday C. 2003. Statistical evaluation of remotely sensed data for water quality monitoring. International Journal of Remote Sensing 24: 5317-5326.
4. Chander G, Markham B. 2003. Revised Landsat-5 TM radiometric calibration procedures and postcalibration dynamic ranges. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 41: 2674-2677.
5. Chavez PS. 1996. Image-based atmospheric corrections - revisited and improved. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 62: 1025-1036.
6. Danaher T. 2002. An empirical BRDF correction for Landsat TM and ETM+ imagery. In Proceedings of 11th Australasian Remote Sensing and Photogrammetry Conference, 2-6 September, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
7. Frouin R, Schwindling M, Deschamps PY. 1996. Spectral reflectance of sea foam in the visible and near-infrared. In situ measurements and remote sensing implications. Journal of Geophysical Research 101: 14361-14371.
8. Green G, Schweik CM, Hanson M. 2000. Radiometric calibration of Landsat multispectral scanner and thematic mapper images: guidelines for the global changes community. Working Paper, Center for the Study of Institutions, Population, and Environmental Change, Indiana University, Bloomington.
9. Jackson RB, Carpenter SR, Dahm CN, McKnight DM, Naiman RJ, Postel SL, Running SW. 2000. Water in a changing world. Ecological Applications 11: 1027-1045.
10. Lillesand TM, Kiefer RW, Chipman JW. 2004. Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation. Wiley: New York.
11. Lu D, Mausel P, Brondizio E, Moran E. 2002. Assessment of atmospheric correction methods for Landsat TM data applicable to Amazon basin LBA research. International Journal of Remote Sensing 23: 1671-2651.
12. Melesse AM, Jordan JD. 2002. A comparison of fuzzy vs. augmented-ISODATA classification algorithms for cloud-shadow discrimination from Landsat images. Photogrammetry Engineering and Remote Sensing 68: 905-911.
13. Metternicht GI, Zinck JA. 1998. Evaluating the information content of JERS- 1 SAR and Landsat TM data for discrimination of soil erosion features. International Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 53: 143-153.
14. OCKKB. 2001. Integrated feasibility study sanitation Tuz Lake, Technical Report, Ankara, Turkey.
15. OCKKB. 2005. The Authority for the Protection of Special Areas, Republic of Turkey, Ministry of Environment and Forestry. www.ockkb.gov.tr [accessed 9 November 2006].
16. Ormeci C, Ekercin S. 2005a. Water quality monitoring using satellite image data: a case study at the Salt Lake, Turkey. In 11th SPIE International Symposium on Remote Sensing, 19-20 September, Bruges, Belgium; 59770K1-59770K11.
17. Ormeci C, Ekercin S. 2005b. Water pollution assessment at the Salt Lake by using remote sensing technique. In 10th Map Meeting, 28 March-1 April, Ankara, Turkey; 138-148.
18. Pax-Lenney M, Woodcock CE, Macomber SA, Gopal S, Song C. 2001. Forest mapping with a generalized classifier and Landsat TM data. Remote Sensing of Environment 77: 241-250.
19. Saniner CAD, Taylor JC, Do Plessis W. 2002. Real-time monitoring of vegetation biomass with NOAA-AVHRR in Etosha National Park, Namibia, for fire risk assessment. International Journal of Remote Sensing 23: 71-89.
20. Stappen GV, Fayazi G, Sorgeloos P. 2001. International study on Artemia LXIII. Field study of the Artemia urmiana (Günther, 1890) population in Lake Urmiah, Iran. Hydrobiologia 466: 133-143.
21. Teillet PM, Dudelzak AE, Pultz TJ, McNairn H. 2001. A framework for in-situ sensor measurement assimilation in remote sensing applications. In Proceedings of 23th Canada Remote Sensing Symposium, 21-24 August, Sainte-Foy, Quebec, Canada.
22. Thenkabail PS. 2003. Biophysical and yield information for precision farming from near-real-time and historical Landsat TM images. International Journal of Remote Sensing 24: 2879-2904.
23. Tucker CJ, Choudhury BJ. 1987. Satellite remote sensing of drought conditions. Remote Sensing of Environment 23: 243-251.
24. White K, El-Asmar HM. 1999. Monitoring changing position of coastlines using thematic mapper imagery, an example from the Nile Delta. Geomorphology 29: 93-105.
25. Wilson PA. 1997. Rule-based classification of water in Landsat MSS images using the variance filter. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 63: 485-491.
26. Yang X, Lo CP. 2000. Relative radiometric normalization performance for change detection from multi-date satellite images. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 66: 967-980.