Convection electric field in the near-Earth tail during the super magnetic storm of November 20-21, 2003

Geophysical Research Letters

Volumn 33, Issue 21, 2006, Pages

  Hori, Tomoaki ^a   Lui, A T Y ^b   Ohtani, S ^b   Brandt, P C ^b   Mauk, B H ^b   McEntire, R W ^b   Maezawa, K ^c   Mukai, T ^c   Kasaba, Y ^c   Hayakawa, H ^c  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY   (Japan)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY APPLIED PHYSICS LABORATORY   (United States)

^c JAPAN AEROSPACE EXPLORATION AGENCY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EARTH ATMOSPHERE; ELECTRIC FIELD EFFECTS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; SOLAR WIND; SPACECRAFT;

CONVECTION ELECTRIC FIELD; MAGNETOTAIL; SUPER MAGNETIC STORMS;

MAGNETIC PROSPECTING;

EARTH; ELECTRIC FIELD; GEOMAGNETIC STORM; MAGNETOTAIL; PLANETARY ATMOSPHERE; SOLAR WIND; SPACECRAFT;

EID: 34248515432     PISSN: 00948276     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1029/2006GL027024     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Ebihara, Y., and M. Ejiri (2003), Numerical simulation of the ring current: Review, Space Sci. Rev., 105(1-2), 377-452.
2. Ebihara, Y, et al. (2005), Ring current and the magnetosphere-ionosphere coupling during the super storm of 20 November 2003, J. Geophys. Res., 110, A09S22, doi: 10.1029/2004JA010924.
3. Hori, T., et al. (2005), Storm-time convection electric field in the near-Earth plasma sheet, J. Geophys. Res., 110, A04213, doi:10.1029/ 2004JA010449.
4. Jordanova, V. K., et al. (2003), Effects of plasma sheet variability on the fast initial ring current decay, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30(6), 1311, doi: 10.1029/2002GL016576.
5. Kasaba, Y., et al. (2006), Evaluation of DC electric field measurement by the double probe system aboard the GEOTAIL spacecraft, Adv. Space Res., 37(3), 604-609.
6. Kokubun, S., et al. (1994), The GEOTAIL magnetic field experiment, J. Geomagn. Geoelectr., 46, 7-21.
7. Miyashita, Y, et al. (2005), Geotail observations of signatures in the near-Earth magnetotail for the extremely intense substorms of the 30 October 2003 storm, J. Geophys. Res., 110, A09S25, doi:10.1029/2005JA011070.
8. Mukai, T., et al. (1994), The low energy particle (LEP) experiment onboard the GEOTAIL satellite, J. Geomagn. Geoelectr., 46, 669-692.
9. Rowland, D. E., and J. R. Wygant (1998), Dependence of the large-scale, inner magnetospheric electric field on geomagnetic activity, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 14,959-14,964.
10. Sharma, A. S., et al. (2003), The storm-substorm relationship: Current understanding and outlook, in Disturbances in Geospace: The Slorm-Substorm Relationship, Geophys. Monogr., vol. 142, edited by A. S. Sharma, Y. Kamide, and G. S. Lakhina, pp. 1-14, AGU, Washington, D. C.
11. Shinbori, A., et al. (2005), Electrodynamics in the duskside inner magnetosphere and plasmasphere during a super magnetic storm on March 13-15, 1989, Earth Planets Space, 57, 643-659.
12. Shue, J., et al. (1998), Magnetopause location under extreme solar wind conditions, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 17,691-17,700.
13. Tsuruda, K., et al. (1994), Electric field measurements on the Geotail satellite, J. Geomagn. Geoelectr., 46, 693-712.
14. Weimer, D. R. (2001), An improved model of ionospheric electric potentials including substorm perturbations and application to the Geospace Environment Modeling November 24, 1996, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 407-416.
15. Wolf, R. A., et al. (1997), Modeling convection effects in magnetic storms, in Magnetic Storms, Geophys. Monogr. Ser., vol. 98, edited by B. T. Tsurutani et al., pp. 161-172, AGU, Washington, D. C.
16. Wygant, J., et al. (1998), Experimental evidence on the role of the large spatial scale electric field in creating the ring current, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 29,527-29,544.