Non-invasive coronary angiography: Current status and perspectives;Nichtinvasive koronarangiographie: Aktueller stand und perspektiven

Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift

Volumn 132, Issue 14, 2007, Pages 750-756

  Achenbach, S ^a   Rost, C ^a   Ropers, D ^a   Pflederer, T ^a   Von Erffa, J ^a   Daniel, W G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ERLANGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Computed tomography; Coronary angiography; Coronary arteries; Coronary artery disease; Imaging; Magnetic resonance imaging

Indexed keywords

ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; GOLD STANDARD; HUMAN; NON INVASIVE PROCEDURE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY STENOSIS; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 34248386475     PISSN: 00120472     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-973615     Document Type: Review

References (51)

1. ACCF/ACR/SCCT/SCMR/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SIR 2006. Appropriateness Criteria for Cardiac Computed Tomography and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 48: 1475-1492
2. Achenbach S. Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 48: 1919-1928
3. Achenbach S, Ropers D, Kuettner A et al. Contrast-enhanced coronary artery visualization by dual-source computed tomography - initial experience. Eur J Radiol 2006; 57: 331-335
4. Achenbach S, Ropers D, Pohle FK et al. Detection of coronary artery stenoses using multi-detector CT with 16(0.75 mm collimation and 375 ms rotation. Eur Heart J 2005; 26: 1978-1986
5. Cademartiri F, Runza G, Mollet NR et al. Impact of intravascular enhancement, heart rate, and calcium score on diagnostic accuracy in multislice computed tomography coronary angiography. Radiol Med (Torino) 2005; 110: 42-51
6. Dewey M, Hoffmann H, Hamm B. Multislice CT coronary angiography: effect of sublingual nitroglycerine on the diameter of the coronary arteries. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2006; 178: 600-604
7. Dewey M, Teige F, Schnappauf D et al. Noninvasive Detection of Coronary Artery Stenoses with Multislice Computed Tomography or Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Ann Intern Med 2006; 145: 407-415
8. Dix WR, Kupper W, Dill T et al. Comparison of intravenous coronary angiography using synchrotron radiation with selective coronary angiography. J Synchrotron Radiat 2003; 10: 219-227
9. Fine JJ, Hopkins CB, Ruff N, Newton FC. Comparison of accuracy of 64-slice cardiovascular computed tomography with coronary angiography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 2006; 97: 173-174
10. Garcia MJ, Lessick J, Hoffmann MH CATSCAN Study Investigators. Accuracy of 16-row multidetector computed tomography for the assessment of coronary artery stenosis. JAMA 2006; 296: 403-411
11. Ghostine S, Caussin C, Daoud B et al. Non-invasive detection of coronary artery disease in patients with left bundle branch block using 64-slice computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 48: 1929-1934
12. Giesler T, Baum U, Ropers D et al. Noninvasive Visualization of Coronary Arteries Using Contrast-Enhanced Multidetector CT: Influence of Heart Rate on Image Quality and Stenosis Detection. Am J Roentgenol 2002; 179: 911-916
13. Gilard M, Cornily JC, Pennec PY et al. Accuracy of multislice computed tomography in the preoperative assessment of coronary disease in patients with aortic valve stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 47: 2020-2024
14. Gilard M, Cornily JC, Rioufol G, Finet G, Pennec PY, Mansourati J, Blanc JJ, Boschat J. Noninvasive assessment of left main coronary stent patency with 16-slice computed tomography. Am J Cardiol 2005; 95: 110-112
15. Hauser TH, Manning WJ. Coronary MRI: More pretty pictures or present-day value? J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 48: 1951-1952
16. Herzog C, Abolmaali N, Balzer JO et al. Heart-rate-adapted image reconstruction in multidetector-row cardiac CT: influence of physiological and technical prerequisite on image quality. Eur Radiol 2002; 12: 2670-2678
17. Herzog C, Arning-Erb M, Zangos S, Eichler K, Hammerstingl R, Dogan S, Ackermann H, Vogl TJ. Multi-detector row CT coronary angiography: Influence of reconstruction technique and heart rate on image quality. Radiology 2006; 238: 75-86
18. Hoffmann MH, Shi H, Manzke R et al. Noninvasive coronary angiography with 16-detector row CT: effect of heart tate. Radiology 2005; 234: 86-97
19. Hoffmann MH, Shi H, Schmitz BL et al. Noninvasive coronary angiography with multislice computed tomography. JAMA 2005; 293: 2471-3478
20. Hoffmann U, Nagurney JT, Moselewski F et al. Coronary multidetector computed tomography in the assessment of patients with acute chest pain. Circulation 2006; 114: 2251-2260
21. Johnson TR, Nikolaou K, Wintersperger BJ et al. Dual-source CT cardiac imaging: initial experience. Eur Radiol 2006; 16: 1409-1415
22. Kuettner A, Beck T, Drosch T et al. Image quality and diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive coronary imaging with 16-detector slice spiral computed tomography with 188 ms temporal resolution. Heart 2005; 91: 938-941
23. Lambertz H, Lethen H, Fries HP, Kersting S. Non-invasive assessment of coronary flow reserve - valuable functional information in cardiac workflow. Ultraschall Med 2004; 25: 25-33
24. Lambertz H, Tries HP, Stein T, Lethen H. Noninvasive assessment of coronary flow reserve with transthoracic signal-enhanced Doppler echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1999; 12: 186-195
25. Leber AW, Knez A, von Ziegler F et al. Quantification of obstructive and nonobstructive coronary lesions by 64-slice computed tomography. A comparative study with quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 46: 147-154
26. Leschka S, Alkadhi H, Plass A et al. Accuracy of MSCT coronary angiography with 64-slice technology: first experience. Eur Heart J 2005; 26: 1482-1487
27. Lethen H, Tries HP, Brechtken J, Kersting S, Lambertz H. Comparison of transthoracic Doppler echocardiography to intracoronary Doppler guidewire measurements for assessment of coronary flow reserve in the left anterior descending artery for detection of restenosis after coronary angioplasty. Am J Cardiol 2003; 91: 412-417
28. Manghat NE, Morgan-Hughes GJ, Broadley AJ et al. 16-detector row computed tomographic coronary angiography in patients undergoing evaluation for aortic valve replacement: comparison with catheter angiography. Clin Radiol 2006; 61: 749-757
29. McCann RL, Schwartz LB, Pieper KS. Vascular complications of cardiac catheterization. J Vasc Surg 1991; 14: 375-381
30. Meijboom WB, Mollet NR, von Mieghem CAG et al. Pre-operative computed tomography coronary angiography to detect significant coronary artery disease in patients referred for cardiac valve surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 48: 1658-1665
31. Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, Krestin GP et al. Improved diagnostic accuracy with 16-row multi-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 45: 128-132
32. Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, van Mieghem CA et al. High-resolution spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients referred for diagnostic conventional coronary angiography. Circulation 2005; 112: 2318-2323
33. Morgan-Hughes GJ, Roobottom CA, Owens PE, Marshall AJ. Highly accurate coronary angiography with submillimetre, 16 slice computed tomography. Heart 2005; 91: 308-313
34. Nassenstein K, Waltering KU, Eggebrecht H, Schlosser T, Hunold P, Barkhausen J. MR-Koronarangiographie mit MS-325, einem Blood-Pool- Kontrastmittel: Vergleich einer Inversion Recovery Steady-State Free Precession und einer Inversion recovery Fast Low Angle Shot Sequenz in Probanden. RöFo 2006; 178: 508-514
35. Nikolaou K, Knez A, Rist C et al. Accuracy of 64-MDCT in the diagnosis of ischemic heart disease. Am J Radiol 2006; 187: 111-117
36. Paetsch I, Huber ME, Bornstedt A et al. Improved three. Dimensional free-breathing coronary magnetic resonance angiography using gadocoletic acid (B-22956) for intravascular contrast enhancement. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004; 20: 288-293
37. Raff GJ, Gallagher MJ, O'Neill WW, Goldstein JA. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 46: 552-557
38. Reant P, Brunot S, Lafitte S et al. Predictive value of noninvasive coronary angiography with multidetector computed tomography to detect significant coronary stenosis before valve surgery. Am J Cardiol 2006; 97: 1506-1510
39. Redberg RF, Sobol Y, Chou TM, Malloy M, Kumar S, Botvinick E, Kane J. Adenosine-induced coronary vasodilation during transesophageal Doppler echocardiography. Rapid and safe measurement of coronary flow reserve ratio can predict significant left anterior descending coronary stenosis. Circulation 1995; 92: 190-196
40. Rixe J, Achenbach S, Ropers D et al. Assessment of coronary artery stent restenosis by 64-slice multi-detector computed tomography. Eur Heart J 2006; 27: 2567-2572
41. Ropers D, Pohle FK, Kuettner A et al. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography in patients after bypass surgery using 64-slice spiral computed tomography with 330-ms gantry rotation. Circulation 2006; 114: 2334-2341
42. Ropers D, Rixe J, Anders K et al. Usefulness of multidetector row computed tomography with 64 x 0.6 mm collimation and 330-ms rotation for the noninvasive detection of significant coronary artery stenoses. Am J Cardiol 2006; 97: 343-348
43. Salm LP, Bax JJ, Jukema JW et al. Comprehensive assessment of patients after coronary artery bypass grafting by 16-detector-row computed tomography. Am Heart J 2005; 150: 775-781
44. Scheffel H, Alkadhi H, Plass A et al. Accuracy of dual-source CT coronary angiography: first experience in a high pre-test probability population without heart rate control. Eur Radiol 2006; 16: 2739-2747
45. Schroeder S, Kopp AF, Kuettner A et al. Influence of heart rate on vessel visibility in noninvasive coronary angiography using new multislice computed tomography: experience in 94 patients. Clin Imaging 2002; 26: 106-111
46. Schuijf JD, Bax JJ, Shaw LJ et al. Meta-analysis of comparative diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging and multislice computed tomography for noninvasive coronary angiography. Am Heart J 2006; 151: 404-411
47. Suzuki A, Fakemura A, Inaba R, Sinibe F, Fsuchiya K, Korenaga T. Magnetic resonance coronary angiography to evaluate coronary arterial lesions in patients with Kawasaki disease. Cardiol Young 2006; 16: 563-571
48. Takeda T, Itai Y, Wu J et al. Two-dimensional intravenous coronary arteriography using above-K-edge monochromatic synchrotron X-ray. Acad Radiol 1995; 2: 602-608
49. Van Buuren F, Horstkotte D. 21. Bericht über die Leistungszahlen der Herzkatheterlabore in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Clin Res Cardiol 2006; 95: 383-387
50. Van Mieghem CA, Cademartiri F, Mollet NR et al. Multislice spiral computed tomography for the evaluation of stent patency after left main coronary artery stenting: a comparison with conventional coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. Circulation 2006; 114: 645-653
51. Varghese A, Keegan J, Pennell DJ. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance of anomalous coronary arteries. Coron Artery Dis 2005; 16: 355-364