Economic analysis of processing tomato growing: The case study of Torbali, west Turkey

Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 7-15

  Engindeniz, S ^a  

^a EGE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Agricultural enterprise; Agricultural production model; Contract based agriculture; Cost analysis; Economic feasibility

Indexed keywords

LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM;

EID: 34248386425     PISSN: 1695971X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5424/sjar/2007051-218     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. AERI, 2001. Input use and production costs for important crops in some regions of Turkey. Agricultural Economics Research Institute, Ankara-Turkey, Research report, Publication No. 64, 248 pp. [In Turkish].
2. AERTS M.J., NESHEIM O.N., 2000. Florida crop/pest management profiles: tomatoes. Cooperative Extension Service, University of Florida, USA, Available at: http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/Topic_Series_Florida_Crop_Pest_ Management_Profiles. [23 July, 2005].
3. BASSEVINC N., ESENGUN K., 1995. The economic analysis of tomato production in the Kazova region of Tokat. Gaziosmanpasa University Journal of Agricultural Faculty 12, 78-93. [In Turkish].
4. BIERENS H.J., 2004. The logit model: estimation, testing and interpretation. Department of Economics, The Pennsylvania State University, Available at: http:// econ.la.psu.edu /~hbierens/ ML_LOGIT.PDF [24 June, 2005].
5. BLAKE D., YOLTAS T., ERKAN S., 2003. The recent situation of the processing tomato industry in Turkey. Acta Horticulturae 613, 437-441.
6. BLOEM S., MIZELL R.F., 2000. Integrated pest management and Florida tomatoes: A success story in progress. Cooperative Extension Service, University of Florida, USA. Available in: http://ipm.ifas.ufl.edu/success-stories/ tomato/tomato.htm [14 July, 2005].
7. CICEK A., AKCAY Y., SAYILI M., 1999. A research on profitability, production costs, and inputs of some important vegetables in Erbaa-Tokat. Publication of Faculty of Agriculture, Gaziosmanpasa University, No.34, Tokat-Turkey, 71 pp. [In Turkish].
8. DARTT B., BLACK R., MARKS P., MORRONE V., 2002. Cost of processing tomato production in Monroe County, Michigan. Staff Paper 2002-41, Department of Agricultural Economics, Michigan State University. 7 pp.
9. DEEPAK M.S., SPREEN T.H., VANSICKLE J.J., 1996. An analysis of the impact of a ban of methyl bromide on the U.S. winter fresh vegetable market. J Agr Appl Econ 28, 433-443.
10. ENGINDENIZ S., 2003. An economic analysis of growing conventional greenhouse tomatoes in Turkey. Practical Hydroponics and Greenhouses 69, 63-66.
11. ENGINDENIZ S., TUZEL Y., 2002. The economic analysis of organic greenhouse tomato production: A case study for Turkey. Agro Food Industry Hi-Tech 13, 26-30.
12. EPC, 2002. Supply survey on food and beverages. Export Promotion Center. South- Trade Promotion Programme, Economic Cooperation Organization, Ankara. 113 pp.
13. ESTES E.A., PEET M., 1999. The bottom line in greenhouse tomato production. North Carolina State University, Department of Agricultural and Research Economics, Report No: 18, North Carolina. 20 pp.
14. FOSTER R., LATIN R., WELLER S., 1993. Pesticide use on processing tomatoes grown in Indiana. Purdue University Cooperative Extension Service, USA. 15 pp.
15. nd ed. Macmillan Publishing Company, USA. 775 pp.
16. rd ed. McGraw Hill Inc., New York, USA. 570 pp.
17. HARTZ T.K., MIYAO G., 1997. Processing tomato production in California. Vegetable Research and Information Center, Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources Publication 7228, University of California. 3 pp.
18. KASENGE V., AKEMO M.C., TAYLOR D.B., KYAMANYWA S.K., ADIPALA E., MUGONOLA B., 2001. Economics of fresh market tomato production by peri-urban farmers in Wakiso district. The Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness, Makerere University, Uganda. 6 pp.
19. KIRAL T., KASNAKOGLU H., TATLIDIL F., FIDAN H., GUNDOGMUS E., 1999. Database guide and income and cost calculation methodologie for agricultural products. Publications of Agricultural Economics Research Institute, No.37. Ankara-Turkey, 133 pp. [In Turkish].
20. KOC A., TANRIVERMIS H., BUDAK F., GUNDOGMUS E., INAN I.H., KUBAS A., OZKAN B., 2001. Pesticide use in Turkish agriculture: Ineffectiveness, problems, and impacts of alternative organizations. Publications of Agricultural Economics Research Institute, No.64, Ankara-Turkey. 316 pp. [In Turkish].
21. nd ed. Publications of Yetkin, Ankara. 367 pp. [In Turkish].
22. O'DELL C., 1995. Update on production costs/expected returns budget for greenhouse. Virginia State University, Department of Horticulture, Blacksburg, Virginia. 4 pp.
23. rd ed. The Dryden Pres, Harcourt Brace College Publishers, USA. 718 pp.
24. REHBER E., 2004. Vertical integration in the food industry and contract farming: The case of Turkey. Outlook on Agriculture 33, 85-91.
25. TANRIVERMIS H., 2000. Economic analysis of pesticide use on tomato growing in Middle Sakarya River Basin. Publications of Agricultural Economics Research Institute, No.42, Ankara-Turkey. 118 pp. [In Turkish].
26. TAYLOR R.A.J., SHALHEVET S., SPHARIM I., BERLINGER M.J., MORDECHI S.L., 2001. Economic evaluation of insect-proof screens for preventing tomato yellow leaf curl virus of tomatoes in Israel. Crop Prot 20, 561-569.
27. TEZEL Z., 2003. The seed of the tomato. Turkishtime 14, 102-105.
28. VANSICKLE J.J., BELIBALIS E., CANTLIFFE D., THOMPSON G., OEBKER N., 1994. Competition in the winter fresh vegetable industry. Agricultural Economics Report No.691, USDA Economic Research Service, Washington DC.